Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review

New Downloads
CPU-Z download v2.04
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4090
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36
MSI Afterburner 4.6.5 (Beta 4) Download


New Forum Topics
Export and Share curve OC profiles for MSI AB (suggestion) NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion 7900XT Increased post time Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL Nvidia 528.34 driver Vulkan Intel Shares Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2022 Financial Results Resizable Bar working on intel's 3rd Gen Ivy Bridge from 2012 AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.1.2 for AMD Radeon™ RX 7900 Series Seagate will release 22TB and 24TB hard disk drives, and in Q3, HAMR HDD with 30TB or more Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc.




Guru3D.com » Review » Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited) » Page 6

Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited) - Game performance 1920x1080 (Full HD)

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/24/2020 12:16 PM [ 5] 53 comment(s)

Tweet

Game  performance 1920x1080 (Full HD)

The game offers several quality settings and modes. At 1920x1080 even entry-level to mainstream graphics cards achieve very good frame-rates at the best possible settings. Visually there is little difference in-between the normal to the most complex mode settings. Let's start with Full HD test the graphics cards based on the quality settings we've shown you. 

Please Note: Framerates vary in different scenes. This is also the reason what on one website the results are lower/higher. Benchmarks are an indication of the scene we play in. Here's what we did, basically you shift that quality preset to level to the max. As you can see in Full HD, all cards are capable enough running that 60+ FPS domain.

  

Update:

We had some users wondering about the performance difference between the initial results and the new data-set. Now before you take a look at that, the results are not to be considered objective, but indicative only. We moved from in-game testing towards the internal benchmark. At the time that yielded little performance differences but still, that is a crucial difference, ergo initially I opted to not include that as a differential chart. Next to that in the original review, we tested DirectX 12 as leading API, whereas now VULKAN is the API of choice. Here again, the difference where and are extremely small. The performance differences reveal itself mostly at a resolution of 1920x1080, ergo the extra result set is now added based on reader request. You can examine how much perf gain after all the new driver updates and patches.

So again, the chart below is an indicative one, not an objective one. The cards with a 0 result that you see are cards that in the old data-set were not tested (as they had not been released back then). But yes, this is a rough estimation of how much performance changed over the past months. Ok, that's enough of a disclaimer right?




9 pages « < 5 6 7 8 next »



Related Articles
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
We take a renewed look at Red Dead Redemption II.  We have retested almost 30 graphics cards on the Windows PC platform gaming-wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVID...

© 2023