Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review

New Downloads
FurMark Download v1.33.0.0
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4091
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download


New Forum Topics
Recommend some good and old drivers for GTX1660S Netflix threatens to ban customers who share an account unauthorized AMD Confirms Strategy of Restraining Chip Supply to Maintain High CPU and GPU Prices DirectStorage testing reveals that PCIe 3 SSDs are as fast as PCIe 5 SSDs, PCIe 4 SSDs almost similar Amernime Zone AMD Software: Adrenalin / Pro Driver - Release Discovery 22.12.2 WHQL The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics performance benchmark analysis Microsoft halts selling Windows 10 on January 31 NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion Whoops?: Cablemod 12VHPWR cable also melts What reason to go to Windows 11?




Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon X1900 XT Crossfire » Page 5

Radeon X1900 XT Crossfire - Page 5

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/27/2006 08:00 AM [ ] 0 comment(s)

Tweet Well it says CrossFIRE but is it hot ?


Well I guess it already had "Fire" in Crossfire.

As always we test temperatures of the graphics cards when they are in idle and 100% at work. While temperature remains within the safety margins the cards are getting really hot ! Heat is one thing you'll have to live with as these cards will get warm, very warm. You'll notice it at boot up already as the cards coolers will immediately spin at 100% and move around air like a blow-dryer (and actually sound like one). It's an indication that the cards need a lot of cooling. We'll discuss sound in the next section.

At idle the cards will be at roughly 50-55 Degrees C .. yes, that's at idle after the Windows boot up.

When we fire off some benchmarks at the cards they will function at 100% graphics core utilization. Just like the entire high-end range of ATI Radeon graphics cards we measured a maximum of around 80 Degrees C peak temperature. I find this to be very high.

The big two slot exhaust coolers also require a lot of space and yes .. tell us something about the temperature a product will create. With Crossfire 1900 XT you now have two of such cards in the PC.

Please, make sure your PC is well ventilated so the cards will get fresh air.

Copyright 2005 - Guru3D.com
The three game-demo's from 3DMark05 clearly show the temperature peak

Noise Levels - dB aah what ??

When graphics cards produce a lot of heat usually that heat needs to be transported away from the hot core as fast as possible. Often you'll see massive active fan solutions that can indeed get rid of the heat, yet all the fans these days make the PC a noisy son of a gun. I'm doing a little try out today with noise monitoring, so basically the test we do is extremely subjective. We bough a certified dBA meter and will start measuring how many dBA originate from the PC. Why is this subjective you ask ? Well, there is always noise in the background, from the streets, from the HD, PSU fan etc etc, so this is by a mile or two not a precise measurement. You could only achieve objective measurement in a sound test chamber.

The human hearing system has different sensitivities at different frequencies. This means that the perception of noise is not at all equal at every frequency. Noise with significant measured levels (in dB) at high or low frequencies will not be as annoying as it would be when its energy is concentrated in the middle frequencies. In other words, the measured noise levels in dB will not reflect the actual human perception of the loudness of the noise. That's why we measure the dBa level. A specific circuit is added to the sound level meter to correct its reading in regard to this concept. This reading is the noise level in dBA. The letter A is added to indicate the correction that was made in the measurement.

TYPICAL SOUND LEVELS

Jet takeoff (200 feet)

120 dBA

 

Construction Site

110 dBA

Intolerable

Shout (5 feet)

100 dBA

 

Heavy truck (50 feet)

90 dBA

Very noisy

Urban street

80 dBA

 

Automobile interior

70 dBA

Noisy

Normal conversation (3 feet)

60 dBA

Crossfire 100% utilized

Office, classroom

50 dBA

Moderate

Living room

40 dBA

 

Bedroom at night

30 dBA

Quiet

Broadcast studio

20 dBA

 

Rustling leaves

10 dBA

Barely audible

We startup a benchmark, we take the dBA meter, move away 75 CM and then aim the device at the active fan on the graphics card. We measure almost 58 dBa which is to be considered a moderate to noisy noise level coming from the PC. Again, this is a very subjective test, but hey .. that's a lot.

Copyright 2006 - Guru3D.com
The Crossfire rig, once it became alive, is loud at 58 dBA




15 pages « < 4 5 6 7 next »



Related Articles
HiS Radeon X1950 Pro ICEQ3 Turbo review
Today's tested product is the shaggy Radeon X1950 Pro which comes with the newer IceQ3 cooling solution; a review on ATI's latest 12-pipe mid-range product which obviously was based off the R580 silicon, and is quite frankly a very credible graphics card as you'll learn in this article. The card features 36 Pixel Shaders units. And for roughly $219-239 you can pickup the 256MB version already.

Radeon X1650 XT & X1950 Pro & Crossfire
Primarily this is a Radeon X1650 XT Crossfire article, yet with included X1950 Pro Crossfire results as well. Ever since NVIDIA released the GeForce 7600 GS/GT cards earlier this year ATI has had a very rough time delivering a product that offers the same performance. They constantly were close but not close enough. ATI worked hard to finish up its new 80 nanometer products and despite a delay of all the 80 nanometer chips, it is finally ready in good quantities. The Radeon X1950 Pro for example is such a product.

HiS Radeon X1650 PRO review
The Radeon X1650 Pro utilizes the ATI RV535 graphics core, a new revision of the RV530 which was the basis of the X1600 series. What's new then you are asking ? Uhm, well nothing except a newer 80nm fabrication process. That 80nm process ensures cheaper production of the silicon and more importantly less heat and likely lower graphics core voltages. That means you can clock the core faster, which was done quite insignificantly for this model but the increase is there.

Radeon X1950 Pro 512MB Review
So today we'll be looking at the rather lovely Radeon X1950 Pro from this company, a review on ATI's latest 12-pipe mid-range product which obviously was based off the R580 silicon, and quite frankly is a very credible graphics card as you'll learn in this article. The card features 36 Pixel Shaders units. For $199 you can pickup the 256MB version already, it sounds like a great deal as it should offer at least twice the performance of a X1600 Pro.

© 2023