Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review

New Downloads
Prime95 download version 30.8 build 16
Memtest86 9.5 download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.4
FurMark Download v1.31
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.3222
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.7.1 driver download
GeForce 516.93 WHQL Studio driver download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.26.110


New Forum Topics
Intel has released performance figures for the Arc A750 Vulkan and DirectX 12 APIs Microsoft pushing driver 512.15 GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 same consumption as RTX 3080 and RTX 3070 but more performance With the new MemTestX86, it will be easier to find spot DDR5 memory modules. DDR5-6000 Memory is the Sweet Spot For AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 CPUs ASUS ROG Strix G15 G513RM gaming notebook with new color electropunk FSR Thread DesktopOverlayHost Overlay display freeze issue 516.94 - Clean Version Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2




Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1060 FCAT Frametime Analysis Review » Page 1

Radeon RX 480 vs GeForce GTX 1060 FCAT Frametime Analysis Review - Introduction

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/27/2016 10:58 AM [ 5] 19 comment(s)

Tweet

Radeon RX 480 Frame Time & Pacing Studied With FCAT

The mid-range segmented Radeon RX 480 and GeForce GTX 1060 have recently been released, in this review we will be analyzing frame time/pacing in combination with FCAT. With FCAT (Frame Capture Analysis Tool) we can easily detect and visualize if there are any problems related to rendering content in terms of stuttering or oddities. For this article we'll test both DirectX 11 and DirectX 12. Recent updates allow us to add the latest DX12 titles into this article as well. To check all this, we revert to our FCAT measuring setup, which we'll explain again in the next few pages. This technique allows us to record each frame rendered precisely up to the millisecond. The beauty of this technique is that it measures at the monitor output side, that means everything you can observe with your eyes (or not) is measured.

The focus for this article today is the Radeon RX 480, as the GTX 1060 already has had an FCAT review. For the FCAT we rely on DVI output and the reference Radeon RX 480 doesn't have one. We just received a AIB RX 480 that has one, hence we dived straight into the results:
  

 

Before you read on-wards, a stutter here and there in any game is common, nothing out of the ordinary. It can be something in your system going on, a little mistake in the rendering engine, a shader doing a complex workload, on and on stutters are common, big anomalies however are not. Now, considering the things we need to do and invest in, to hunt down anomalies takes a bit of a scientific approach. As such, this article is not for everybody as it is a bit more complex and academic opposed to what you are used to.

Since our reference articles are 30 pages long these days, we decided to mostly separate FCAT frametime and pacing results from the reference reviews. Also this is not everybody's cup of tea alright, hence separated content makes a bit more sense. But I wanted to show what we are doing and how we are doing it as transparently as can be. Now then, our FCAT solution requires multiple thousands EUR worth of hardware and is not something you can easily recreate at home. I also left a lot out in terms of complex issues and will take a very simple to understand approach, which hopefully, the majority of you guys and girls can understand. First let's discuss a little about frametime recording, the method we use (FCAT) and challenges ahead. 
  



Meet the FCAPS setup - two dedicated PCs and two monitors merely for a handful of plotted graphs.




17 pages 1 2 3 4 next »



Related Articles
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
ASUS also offers a nice Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB, we review the beefed-up STRIX Gamign OC edition with proper cooling, low temps, and low acoustics. Well, that and a nice factory tweak as well of course...

Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
We review the Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+. This card is aimed at Full HD gaming and remains totally silent whilst running pretty cool. Looking at the quality build, you'd almost forget that thi...

Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire is also present with a totally new lineup, meet the incredibly impressive Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure. The factory tweaked product side does deliver when it comes to cool...

Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire also offers a nice Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB, we review the beefed-up Nitro+ edition with proper cooling, low temps, and low acoustics. Well, that and a nice factory tweak as well of course. ...

© 2022