Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960


New Forum Topics
Antec Announces Cannon full-tower chassis at a whopping 500 USD Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. Project Zero from MSI hides all connectors on motherboard Micron announces upcoming Crucial P3 Plus and Crucial P3 NVMe SSDs [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) NVIDIA GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download & Discussion A 500Hz refresh rate NVIDIA G-Sync compatible gaming LCD is in the works Are we ever going to get a new NVIDIA CONTROL PANEL ??? AMD Goves Saints Row or Sniper Elite 5 for Radeon RX 6000 Raise the Game bundle NVIDIA DLSS Extends Support for 12 More Games including Hitman 3 and F1 22




Guru3D.com » Review » PCI Express Scaling Game Performance Analysis review » Page 13

PCI Express Scaling Game Performance Analysis review - Performance - 2-way SLI GPU - Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/19/2015 10:17 AM [ 5] 54 comment(s)

Tweet

GeForce GTX 980 2-way SLI DX11: Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor is an action role-playing video game set in The Lord of the Rings universe, developed by Monolith Productions and released by Warner Bros. The game takes place during the gap between the events of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings saga. We set image quality to in-game 'Very High'. Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor has a built in benchmark. It is not exactly the most precise tool in the shed, therefore you should always keep a variance of roughly 5% in mind. You can run this benchmark 3 times and all times the results can differ slightly. Also switching in-between quality modes and restarting the game often results in the game forcing old image quality settings again. We'll see how this benchmark is going to develop in the future though.

 

Above the results at the best image quality settings. Again let me state that we are testing at 2560x1440 (WHQD) with image quality settings set to Very High. With an exception here and there, this is the image that is repetitive, Gen 1.1 becomes a bit of a bottleneck. Coming from 1.1. and going to Gen 2.0 shows a 7% perf improvement. The difference in-between an x16 Gen 2.0 and 3.0 slot is 4%

Frametime Recording

 

 

  • Grey line - GTX 980 @ x16 Gen 1.1
  • Dark green line - GTX 980 @ x16 Gen 2.0
  • Light green line - GTX 980 @ x16 Gen 3.0

We again spread our 42 seconds lasting benchmark recording and then overlay latency results from the difference generation PCIE slots (lower latency - better). We can see a hint better as to what you are seeing on screen. The latency differences in-between the PCIE Slot configurations are both measurable and noticeable in-between the slowest and fastest configuration. Again, PCIe gen 1.1 x16 (grey) is slower in latency opposed to the differential inbetween Gen 2.0 and 3.0.




17 pages « < 12 13 14 15 next »



Related Articles
PCI Express Scaling Game Performance Analysis review
Join us in a review where we look into the PCIe slot in Gen 1.1, 2.0 and 3.0 configurations as we measure performance versus single and Multi-GPU solution. Will that outdated slot configuration really...

Plextor M6e PCI Express SSD Review
Plextor released an M.2 Express based PCI Express SSD, and we review it. Designed and based on PCI Express 2.0 x4 slot, the newcomers are 128 GB, 256 GB and 512 GB SSDs powered by a Marvell controller...

GeForce 6800 GT PCI Express
Today's article as you can guess will be all about NVIDIA's GeForce 6800 GT on that new PCI-Express 16x bus. It has twice the bandwidth and sounds very promising, let's get acquainted with that we are talking about today and that would be the sporty named GeForce 6800 GT; which I believe is the best product in terms of bang for your bucks in the high-end graphics arena.

© 2022