Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
MSI MEG X570 Unify review
Scythe Ninja 5 air cooler review

New Downloads
3DMark Download v2.16.7117 + Time Spy
Prime95 download version 30.4 build 6
Crystal DiskMark 8.0.1 Download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v3.37.140
ReShade download v4.9.1
GeForce 461.09 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9126
HWiNFO Download v6.41–4345 Beta
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Beta 4 Download
BaseMark GPU Benchmark v1.2.3 download


New Forum Topics
Grab for free: Star Wars Battlefront II: Celebration Edition Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2 The AMD Ryzen All In One Tread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 Review: EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra NVIDIA and AMD Graphics card shortages to last thoughout H1 2021 Premium Z590 motherboards to become brutally expensive, one mobo even passes 1500 EUR CD Projekt apologizes for the release of Cyberpunk 2077 and shows 2021 roadmap RX Vega Owners Thread, Tests, Mods, BIOS & Tweaks ! (cont.) Share your radeon driver settings with a noob Samsung Initiates Consumer Branding for its OLED Displays in 27 Countries




Guru3D.com » Review » OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review » Page 17

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review - Final words and conclusion

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 04/03/2012 01:00 PM [ ] 0 comment(s)

Tweet

  

Final words and conclusion

The all new Vertex 4 series seems to be a strong basis and leaves me with thirst for some more. Realistically for those on Vertex 3 or for that matter any modern slash proper SATA3 based SSD -- you'll hardly miss out on anything. If anything the Vertex 4 uses the same performance bracket as Vertex 3, and can even be a little slower or faster depending on circumstances and application.

Some of the benchmark results seem to be a little off somehow, as some tests show just odd numbers. Nonetheless, looking at the overall picture the performance is there alright and the tests that do respond to the SSD properly, respond with excessive numbers.

Compared to Vertex 3 with SandForce we can only conclude that the SandForce 2200 series is out of trend (a little undeserved really), lots of people we think would surely opt the Vertex 4 series as the Indilinx controllers have proven to be extremely reliable when it comes to safely controlling your precious data. But I foresee that the Vertex 4 series will definitely see a few new firmware updates. The good thing is that you can update a downloadable application toolbox and reflash your firmware without loosing data. We tested that on both drives actually.

A heartening factor is active with the Vertex 4 series SSD, once we popped it in to our test setup it just felt good in every way and sense. SandForce 2000 controllers haul ass in uncompressed files, Indilinx Everest 2 hauls ass when it comes to both compressed and uncompressed files versus read/writes. Honestly overall if I'd have to pick an either an SandForce 2281 based SSD or a Indilinx Everest 2 based Vertex 4, it would probably be the latter. OCZ has proprietary technology in their hands that they control and regulate.

Overall performance to previously tested SSD units for the Vertex 4 SATA3 SSDs simply is good, admittedly here and there lacks and have shown some offsets in performance compared to that oh so tough competition. So hopefully the overall performance will go upwards with future firmware releases. 

With the Vertex 4 series you do need to understand though that the smaller the SSD is on volume size, the slower it gets in write performance (less active channels). That makes a 128GB model write at only 200 MB/sec whereas the 256GB version writes at 380 MB/sec and the 512MB version at 475 MB/sec. Then again that behavior is the same for pretty much any other brand non Sandforce controller based SSD.

When looking at the benchmarks try and focus a bit at the IOPS performance throughout the SSD series, it is very fast and shows what the SSD is capable of. If an SSD in high stress can perform well with small 4K files, it's a real good indicator of the muscle behind that SSD. Obviously if you put a drive like this into your SATA3 compatible laptop or SATA3 compatible PC, you'll have no idea what is about to hit you. We very much enjoy the grand sustained performance of this SSD series, so you you copy a fast amount of compressed data, then the Vertex 4 will slaughter in performance.

Some overall recommendations then. Should you be in the market for a SATA3 SSD then we have a couple of hints though, we absolutely prefer the performance of the Intel Series 6 (H67/P67/Z68/X79/Z77) integrated SATA 6G controller over anything else available in the market. If you run an AMD chipset with the added Marvell 6G controller for example, you will see lower performance, make no mistake about that. The Asmedia controllers we spotted lately on motherboards is offering good performance, albeit still 25% slower then Intel. Also make sure you run your drive in AHCI mode, it does make a significant difference.

Prices HDD versus SSD -- well my advice is simple and I'll keep repeating this in each and every SSD conclusion; you probably should stop looking at the Solid State Disk technology as if it were a traditional HDD. We all will be old and grey before the two reach the same prices or top the multiple TB volume storage the HDD offers for less money. Comparing an SSD with an HDD is making a comparison in-between an integrated IGP or a dedicated graphics card, that last one will cost you a heck of a lot more yet you gain incredible overall performance. It is the very same with an SSD, use it as boot drive on Windows and applications and you instantly have removed a huge bottleneck, load and access times. It is a difference in-between night and day (in a proper system). For massive storage like movies, MP3 files and bulky data you do not access on a regular basis, sure that's where the HDD remains the winner.

 OCZ Octane

The science behind this is is simply finding a good combination in-between the two and balance things out. That's where the magic happens. I kid you not, all my test systems and work systems run on SSDs, not once have I considered going back to HDDs. The benefits of a good SSD are simply grand. But that doesn't mean I do not understand the budget and cost dilemma that many of you are facing though. There are still many variables and unknowns regarding life-span.

We stated it with the Octane series reviews already, but the acquisition of Indlinx OCZ was an investment risk for OCZ, honestly we had our concerns. The Octane series already had proven our skepticism wrong, and with the new Vertex 4 series OCZ again confirms it was the right thing to do.

The good thing about the Vertex 4 series is that it remains fairly steady pricing wise, in fact at 1.35 USD per GB it's even slightly cheaper then some other high-end model SSDs. Hopefully you can find it for a price that is acceptable for you. We end this article with the words we always say, an SSD is the best upgrade a modern PC can use, your operating system flies, there are no waits which you normally have with an HDD, there's no noise and hardly any power consumption.

If you have a proper PC with a SATA3 controller, the Vertex 4 series are definitely going to impress you in terms of performance, and we expect reliability as well. To proof that OCZ is backing their technology they will even give the product a very nice 5 year warranty, which we feel is the right move to make.

For those still weary of SandForce 2200 series SSDs, all we can say... the Vertex 4 might be the alternative you've been looking for and as such comes recommended.

  • Leave/read comments on this product
  • Sign up to receive a notice when we publish a new article
  • Or go back to Guru3D's front page



17 pages « < 14 15 16 17



Related Articles
OCZ Vertex 460 SSD review
We review and test the OCZ Vertex 460 SSD series released in 120 - 240 and 480 GB versions. Based on the Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller we test the 120GB NAND flash memory based model. The end result is an ...

OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
In this article we test, benchmark and review the all new OCZ Vertex 450 SSD. Armed with the new Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller this is the fifth incarnation of the popular OCZ Vertex series. Will it be as fast and competitive as it's predecessors ? Well let's see and find out shall we ?

OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
In this article we test, benchmark and review the OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD. What a great and fast piece of technology this is. An 20nm NAND flash SSD that is speedy and actually amongst the the rest of the devices tested, but also mroe affordable. Head on over into the review.

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review with 1.5 firmware
We retest the OCZ Vertex 4 SSD yet now with 1.5 firmware update. , again bringing more performance towards the Vertex 4 series of SSDs. And albeit the difference is not as big as the 1.4 release was, it certainly makes a difference as this article will show you.

© 2021