Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
GALAX GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX White review
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v7.42
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4257
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta4 Download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.88
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1


New Forum Topics
The Last of Us Part I PC Port Receives 77% negative ratings on Steam, due to poor optimization Entertainment Software Association (ESA) Cancels E3 2023 Event due to Lack of Industry Support NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Valve to Discontinue Support for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 on Steam Starting 2024 Introducing the ASRock AMD A620 Motherboard Series: Budget-Friendly Performance G.SKILL Launches Up to DDR5-8200 DDR5 Memory Kits with 24GBx2 and 48GBx2 Capacities Nvidia Cracks Down on Counterfeit Graphics Cards in Collaboration with Chinese E-commerce Platforms Vulkan Beta Driver 531.54 (Windows) Reporting a bug "nvlddmkm" errors event id 0 \Device\Video3 Mainstream GeForce RTX 4050 Graphics Card Launching in June 2023




Guru3D.com » Review » Intel series 520 240GB SSD review » Page 16

Intel series 520 240GB SSD review - Final words and conclusion

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 02/05/2012 03:00 PM [ ] 0 comment(s)

Tweet

 

Final words and conclusion

Intel has a very enjoyable SSD in their hands with the 520 series. We honestly where surprised though that after everything that has happened with the SandForce 2200 series controllers and their firmware issues that Intel actually pursued this product as a basis for their most high performing product.

Let me explain, the past year Sandforce 2281 based product have been plagued with firmware issues, the SSD would spontaneously drop themselves from the storage array, or sleep mode related bugs made the SSDs system crash. It was weird to see and witness. Though we always have had a hard time replicating the issues ourselves, a lot of our readers did run into them. As such it is only fair to mention this.

The latest firmwares have solved 99% of the problems, but for many the trust in SandForce based products vaporized. Please know that Intel develops their own Firmware, but obviously uses the source code from LSI. I'd honestly have no problem using a 2281 based product myself, I'll even step it up a notch, most of our tests systems are equipped with one -- but the reputation damage is done and all costumers flee to Indilinx and Marvel controller based product, just to be save -- and we can't blame them.

Being SandForce 2281 based the peak read and write performance on this product will be a notch higher when you compare it to Marvel and Indilinx based product. When you focus purely at IOPS performance, well that's where an SSD like this is a winner, hands down.

The big question remains, and its totally up to you, if you still, trust SandForce 2200 series based products. Again, know that the initial bugs have been found, squashed and eliminated. The SandForce controllers are stable and it shouldn't be a reason to "not" get one. But storage is all about reliability, and if that reputation is dented... well it might be until the next generation until people will regain that trust. Data integrity means the world to us, you can't forfeit on that -- period.

Intel 520 Series SSD

An SSD is enjoyable, very much so. If you put a drive like this into your SATA 3 compatible laptop or SATA 3 compatible PC, you'll have no idea what is about to hit you. We very much enjoy the grand sustained performance of this SSD series, so you you copy a fast amount of compressed data, then the Series 520 will slay and slaughter in performance.

SATA Controllers
Some overall recommendations then. Should you be in the market for a SATA 3 SSD then we have a couple of hints though, we absolutely prefer the performance of the Intel Series 6 (H67/P67/Z68/X79) integrated SATA 6G controller over anything else available in the market. If you run an AMD chipset with the added Marvell 6G controller for example, you will see lower performance.

The new Asmedia controllers we spotted lately on motherboards are also offering good performance, albeit still 20%~25% slower then Intel's controllers. Also make sure you run your drive in AHCI mode, it does make such a difference in performance -- really guys, a big difference.

Prices HDD versus SSD
My advice is simple and I'll keep repeating this in each and every SSD conclusion; you probably should stop looking at the Solid State Disk technology as if it were a traditional HDD. We all will be old and grey before the two reach the same prices or top the multiple TB volume storage the HDD offers for less money. Comparing an SSD with an HDD is making a comparison in-between an integrated IGP or a dedicated graphics card, that last one will cost you a heck of a lot more yet you gain incredible overall performance. It is the very same with an SSD, use it as boot drive on Windows and applications and you instantly have removed a huge bottleneck, namely load and access times. It is a difference in-between night and day (in a proper system). For massive storage like movies, MP3 files and bulky data you do not access on a regular basis, sure that's where the HDD remains the winner as a cheaper storage solution.

The magic simply is finding a good combination in-between the two and balance things out. That's where the magic happens. I kid you not, all my test systems and work systems run on SSDs, not once have I considered going back to HDDs. The benefits of a good SSD are simply grand. But that doesn't mean I do not understand the budget and cost dilemma that many of you are facing though. There are still many variables and unknowns regarding life-span.

The future
2012 is going to be an interesting year alright, there are new competitive players in the SSD arena when it comes to brands but also the soiree of SATA 3 SSD controllers. So we expect the dynamic to shift in 2012 alright, especially with the one fact in mind that SandForce has been purchased by LSI recently.

All these options in the SSD arena will only make things more competitive and that as always drives performance up and prices down. Which is a good thing of course.

Concluding
Choice is good though. The Intel Series 520 SSD 240GB model as tested today is an incredible sexy and high performing product, it's late to a crowded SandForce 2281 market though. Intel certainly holds ground amongst the competition, though I dare to state that parties like OCZ and Corsair have a more refined firmware allowing a notch more performance. Hey, they had a year advantage in the development process. The performance differences however are too small to ever notice in real-world usage.

At a price of sub 200 EUR for a 120GB model we'll have to see how popular the 520 series really will become. SandForce is jinxed and though I have complete and utter confidence in the 2281 based products based on the latest firmware, reputation damage is a hard thing to fight off. To keep the good spirit, Intel will cover this product with a five year warranty, opposed to the two or three years you see from other manufacturers. Regardless of how you might feel, we certainly can recommend the 520 series, it is a powerhouse in terms of storage performance and as such comes recommended.

  • Leave/read comments on this product
  • Sign up to receive a notice when we publish a new article
  • Or go back to Guru3D's front page



16 pages « < 13 14 15 16



Related Articles
Intel series 520 240GB SSD review
We review the Intel series 520 240GB SSD. They now have multiple SSDs on the market initially with their proprietary controller, then a Marvel controller, and today Intel releases the Series 520 SSDs based on SandForce, well LSI these days.

Intel series 320 SSD review
We review the Intel series 320 SSD. Armed with cheaper NAND flash memory this drive competes at the middle segment tagged with a decent price. But will it be enough to compete with the competition ?

© 2023