Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Gaming OC review

Graphics cards 1049 Page 29 of 29 Published by

teaser

Final words and conclusion

Performance

The Gigabyte RTX 3090 Ti Gaming OC has it all for a pretty precious gaming experience – NVIDIA's Ampere GPU with 2nd gen RTX architecture, enhanced RT cores, Tensor cores, does deliver, as well as a whopping 24GB worth of GDDR6X memory. This is a performance level aimed at PC master race enthusiasts and content creators. The graphics card will have no problem running games at more than 60 frames per second at 4K resolution, especially with DLSS in mind. However, it's a product maybe 7-8% faster than a reference 3090 whilst consuming roughly 100 Watts more energy at a starting price of 2000 USD. You must feed the card what it requires, preferably a GPU-intensive game in Ultra HD. NVIDIA says that this card is capable of running games at 8K resolution; however, we cannot verify this objectively. At Full HD, you'll frequently encounter bottlenecks and CPU constraints. However, the performance boost in some games with good programming and the appropriate API (DX12/ASYNC computation) is amazing. The venerable rasterizer engine smashes straight over the extreme performance barrier. All of this is possible because of the 10+ K Shading processors. We can confidently declare that this is a real Ultra HD capable graphics card, as it should be at this price point. However, whether you use regular rendering or games that support ray tracing and DLSS management all come together in that UHD resolution. An updated generation (more powerful) of Ray tracing and Tensor cores have been added to the RTX 30 series. Therefore, do not be misled by the real RT and Tensor core counts. They're positioned close to the rendering engine, which means they've become more efficient, which shows. When using an RTX 2080 with Port Royale, we can get over 30 frames per second. Almost 70 frames per second, the RTX 3090 Ti greatly doubles that. Tensor cores are more difficult to quantify, but given what we have observed thus far, everything appears to be in balance. Overall, the GeForce RTX 3080 makes sense starting at a Quad HD resolution (2560x1440), whereas the RTX 3090 and Ti make sense starting at an Ultra HD resolution (3840x2160). As is typically the case when comparing apples to oranges, performance statistics differ slightly between architectures due to each architecture's inherent benefits and weaknesses in certain game render workloads.


78917_img_9990

Cooling & noise levels

The Gaming OC series supports two distinct BIOSes. By default, OC mode is selected. And at 42~43 DBa, the card offers balanced but bearable yet hearable acoustics. Remember this product has a 465 Watt TGP, and that requires serious real-estate cooling wise. The trade-off is that temperatures in this mode are closer to 65 degrees C. In quiet mode you're hovering just above the 70 degrees C threshold, here however DBa levels drop to a very comfortable 36-37 DBa. Alternately, you can use the Performance BIOS setting. The OC mode is a notch faster though, we're talking 1% here. 

Energy

NVIDIA is listing a TGP at 350 Watt for the 3090 FE. This 3090 Ti factory tweaked one has a 450 Watt TGP. Our measured total board power passes  465 Watts when looking at peaks. Add to that any tweaks you might apply, and you're closing in at 500 Watts. Regardless of how I look at it, I am not comfortable with this kind of power usage in this day and age with rising KWh prices throughout Europe.

Coil whine

Where the FE produces some, we had a hard time detecting coil whine on this card. Graphics cards all make this in some form, especially in high framerates this can be perceived. In a closed chassis, that noise fades away in the background.

Pricing

NVIDIA is pricing the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti at $1999 USD. It's excessive money for something to play PC games on. This product is so exclusive that it creates its own niche. This AIB card will likely get listed at  €2350 with a similar number in USD. But if availability is low, we can easily see the prices hike to the sub-2500 EUR/USD marker.

Tweaking

We've been mildly conservative with tweaking this card, and so should you. Remember you're already at a power budget close to 500 Watts. Our card has a restricted power limiter, e.g. you cannot increase power usage. Also, voltage regulation was not in place just yet. In the end, a +120 Mhz on the core offset brought the card towards 2200 MHz depending on the game. However, you'll be more restricted due to the power limiter maxing out at 7%. The memory easily could take another +750 MHz. And at double data-rate that made it work perfectly fine at 22500 MHz (effective data-rate). Overall we've been able to bump roughly 4-5% additional performance out of the card.


Conclusion

Other than gaming, the RTX 3090's powerful GPU and massive 24GB of memory will benefit content creation that requires as much memory as possible, such as 8K Redcode RAW projects, rendering large scenes in OctaneRender, simultaneous cached playback and Arnold Render in Autodesk Maya, and so on, allowing content creators to create high-quality content more efficiently than ever before. That however is the only way to put that large 24GB memory to good use, since I don't see any existing AAA titles that will take up that much memory if you only game at 4K. As a gamer, the additional 24GB of VRAM will almost certainly go unused. Unless you're going all-in on your setup, the RTX 3080 Ti or RTX 3070 Ti is still the choice to make — at the least, you'll have a far better chance of actually utilizing that 12GB or 10GB of VRAM.


Untitled-33


The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Gaming OC increased performance by close to 7~8% compared to the 3090 founder edition. And it's clocked faster than the new Ti founder edition. It's a gorgeous product—both in terms of gaming performance and rendering quality. My primary considerations are not performance, cooling. This card uses close to 500 Watts of power, which is just too too much in the year 2022, that and the price level obviously. Likely many of you will disagree with me or will be unconcerned about energy use though. For this card to make any sense, you must be gaming in an Ultra HD resolution or above. Regardless of my frowning on price and energy consumption; I do adore a nice chunk of gear inside a PC, though. Please ensure that you have enough ventilation, as the RTX 3090 Ti generates a great deal of heat. Although it is large, it still looks fantastic. Remember this though, the card is extremely powerful if you provide it with the proper circumstances, these are the highest resolutions, image quality settings, and GPU bound games. Performance-wise inbetween brands really, you trade perhaps 1% or 2% here and there. So that is not the decisive factor to beat. Tweaking-wise, this card series will offer another ~5% performance (depending on your luck). In the end, this GeForce RTX 3090 Ti with 10,752 CUDA cores is quicker in 4K than the GeForce RTX 3090 with 10,496 compute units. Whether or not that is worth the extra 100 Watts and 2000  USD price tag is a hard call to make really. Especially with Hopper architecture now on the horizon. Asus does a good job of designing cooling systems capable of taming the 450W-500W GPUs without generating excessive noise and maintaining stable temperatures. For RTX GPUs, the primary issue is mostly out of Gigabytes' hands, availability, and street prices. With that stated and having in mind that this card will cost twice as much as the RTX 3080 Ti with similar cooling, we'd recommend the latter to 99 percent of enthusiasts. For the remaining single digit % who still want the best for their gaming system or content makers looking for that one graphics card that packs a ton of RAM for their creative endeavors, the RTX 3090 Ti is undoubtedly the card to consider. Gigabyte did it right though, this is a very solid performer when compared to the competition whilst offering proper acoustics and temperature levels. 

Sign up to receive a notification when we publish a new article.
Or go back to Guru3D's front page

- Hilbert, LOAD"*",8,1.

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print