GeForce GTS 450 review roundup

Graphics cards 1048 Page 19 of 27 Published by

teaser

VGA performance: Battlefield Bad Company 2 (DX11)

 

Battlefield Bad Company 2 DX11

The Battlefield series has been running for quite a while. The last big entry in the series, Bad Company, was a console exclusive, much to the disappointment of PC gamers everywhere. DICE broke the exclusivity with the sequel, thankfully, and now PC owners are treated to the best Battlefield since Battlefield 2.

The plot follows the four soldiers of Bad Company as they track down a "new" super weapon in development by Russian forces. You might not immediately get that this game is about Bad Company, as the intro mission starts off with a World War II raid, but it all links together in the end.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 - Next to being a great game for gameplay, it's also an awesome title to test both graphics cards and processors. The game has native support for DirectX 11 and on the processor testing side of things, parallelized processing supporting two to eight parallel threads, which is great if you have a quad core processor. 

We opt to test DX11 solely for this title as we want to look at the most modern performance and image quality. DX11 wise, we get as extras softened dynamic shadows and shader based performance improvements. A great game to play, a great game image quality wise. We raise the bar, image quality settings wise:

  • Level Upriver
  • DirectX 11 enabled
  • 8x Multi-sample Anti-aliasing
  • 16 Anisotropic filtering
  • All image quality settings enabled at maximum

As you can see, 8x AA really is not an option. We need to forfeit to 2x AA or likely disable AA all together if we want to play with high quality settings at 1600x1200.

The cards compared amongst each other show really significant differences. The cards are sensitive to different clock frequencies.

A somewhat new title and as such, less results for the performance chart than the rest. Above however is the game with a variety of DX11 cards at 8x AA and 16x AF, and again 8x AA is not realistic and neither is 1920x1200. But this is a performance chart, nothing more nothing less.

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print