Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4255
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221


New Forum Topics
Diablo IV Beta Reportedly Causing Issues with GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, Potentially Leading to Card Failure Vulkan Beta Driver 531.46 3080 Ti owners advised to avoid Diablo 4 if their card has AOZ5312UQI buck controller. NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Review: ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Nvidia modifies its H100 Hopper GPU and markets it as the H800 to Chinese market Genesis Thor 303 TKL Silent Switch: A Quiet and Durable Mechanical Keyboard for Gamers Framework Laptop Unveils Two New Models 13th Core and AMD Ryzen 7040 Series Windows power plan settings explorer utility Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2




Guru3D.com » Review » EVGA GeForce GTX 275 1792MB review » Page 2

EVGA GeForce GTX 275 1792MB review - The GeForce GTX 275 GPU

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/15/2009 02:00 PM [ ] 0 comment(s)

Tweet


The GeForce GTX 275 GPU

So I'd like to start off with a little 101 on the GTX 200 series GPU. The GTX 275 is all about the 55nm fabrication based product series GTX 200 (GT200 series ASIC name). The same graphics processor as the GTX 285 is being used on this product.

The GTX series 200 GPU sums up to 1400 million transistors. It's the biggest beast of a graphics processor that NVIDIA has ever built with 1400 million transistors, well .. to date that is. It makes you wonder about GT300 eh ?

It's funny, as at the very time I'm writing this article, I'm also working on a history of Guru3D.com article, and in the beginning we had 1 million transistors per GPU back then, and we are roughly a 10 year timespan here, um yeah ... 3dfx folks.

I mentioned this in a couple of reviews already, but 1400 million transistors ... think of a transistor as an on/off switch on = 1 and off = 0. Now imagine 1400 million transistors times the clock frequency of the GPU (this determines how many times per second the transistors can change state, or, rather, switch between 1 and 0).

Then take a MHz, 1 MHz denotes one million hertz or one million cycles per second. I don't know what will drive you more nuts; thinking about the number of operations going on in a GPU, or squeezing your left nut. If you think about that for a minute you might go nuts.

GeForce GTX 275 primary features:

  • 1.4 billion transistors
  • 993 GigaFLOP processing power
  • 240 processing (shader) cores (GTX 275)
  • 55nm node fabrication
  • DirectX 10
  • New power management enhancements
  • CUDA parallel processing
  • GeForce PhysX

So, how different is the GTX 275 to the GTX 285? A very valid question, the answer is: for you as an end user, not much. In fact, the very same GPU has been utilized bringing 240 stream processors to the GTX 275.

What is different though is that the GTX 275 obviously had to be a tad slower than big daddy GTX 285. Therefore NVIDIA gave it the GTX 260 memory configuration, 896 MB of gDDR3 memory over a 448-bit bus (opposed to 512bit). It gives the product a 127 GB/s bandwidth.

The new GeForce GTX 275 reference based product will run at a core clock frequency of 632 MHz. There are more clocked domains inside that GPU though, the shader processors run at 1404 MHz and the memory is at 1134 MHz (effectively 2268 MHz). And though that is a higher clock opposed to the previous GTX 280, it is slightly slower than a GTX 285. But really, it accounts for only a little performance differential.

Standard reference specifications:

  GeForce GTX
260
GeForce GTX
275
GeForce GTX
280
GeForce GTX
285
GeForce GTX
295
Stream (Shader) Processors 192 240 240 240 240 x2
Core Clock (MHz) 576 632 602 648 576
Shader Clock (MHz) 1242 1404 1296 1476 1242
Memory Clock (MHz) x2 999 1134 1053 1242 999
Memory amount 896 MB 896 MB 1024 MB 1024 MB 1792 MB
Memory Interface 448-bit 448-bit 512-bit 512-bit 448-bit x2
HDCP Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Two Dual link DVI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

For the folks that like to go a little deeper: this high-end part has 896MB/1792MB of GDDR3 memory which has a 448-bit memory bus that binds to seven 64-bit memory controllers inside the GPU.

When we follow that good old pixel pipeline we run into a ROP (Raster Operation) domain. The GTX 275 has 28 of them and 80 texture filtering units. Performance accounts up to roughly 1 TFLOP (depending how you measure it actually).

What's nice about the GTX 275 release is that it is based off the new 55nm fabrication process, this has several advantages. The new 55nm GTX series 200 GPUs require a little less voltage, as a result it consumes less power. You'll spot two 6-pin connectors on the boards, whereas the GTX 280 for example still had one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector for it's feed.

Here's the NVIDIA reference sample:

GeForce GTX 275 reference review

The TDP (peak wattage) is now roughly 219 Watts. The product got faster, yet consumes less power. Cast your mind back to the GeForce 8800 Ultra which used 235W (peak) where we now see cards perform at least twice as much with less power needed. Performance per Watt again has increased on many fronts, which is good as it's the green thing to do.

As stated the GTX 275 is fed by two six-pin connectors. Power consumption for this 10.5-inch board is ~219W. 

GeForce GTX 275 reference review



21 pages 1 2 3 4 next »



Related Articles
EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Review
In this review, we test the EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming, a premium card with extras and factory tweak. The performance certainly holds ground as it is a proper player in the graphics a...

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
All your base belong to EVGA, join us as we review their compact GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming, also with 12GB, 3584 shading processors activated but with a proper factory boost clock of 1882 MHz, a grap...

EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
We review and benchmark a custom design GeForce RTX 3070, this round the EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 in specific in an Ultra edition. We'll plant this card in our test system to see how well it perfo...

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 review
We check out the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FTW2 iCX  8G, and heck yeah this is not your regular one. Meet the all custom, cooled and tweaked EVGA For The Win2 Edition. This SKU is a more premium version...

© 2023