Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Silicon Power XPOWER XS70 1TB NVMe SSD Review
Hyte Y60 chassis review
ASUS ROG Thor 1000W Platinum II (1000W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WIFI6E router review
Backforce One Plus Gaming Chair review

New Downloads
CrystalDiskInfo 8.17 Download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 Windows 7 driver download
ReShade download v5.2.2
HWiNFO Download v7.26
7-Zip v22.00 Download
GeForce 516.40 WHQL driver download
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1736
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 WHQL driver download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.24.193
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1994


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA GeForce 516.40 WHQL driver download & Discussion Up to 96 cores and 12 DDR5 memory channels with AMD Zen4-based server processors. 3060ti vs 6700xt a year later GeForce GTX 1630 will launch on June 28 PlayStation 3 emulator increases its CPU performance by 30% with AVX-512 nvidia HD audio driver issues Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) We need to talk about UE4 Shader compilation issues Intel Arc A380 Performs Pretty Bad with AMD CPUs




Guru3D.com » Review » Core i7 4960X processor review » Page 20

Core i7 4960X processor review - Conclusion

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/03/2013 08:53 AM [ 4] 61 comment(s)

Tweet

Final Words & Conclusion

You know, when the Sandy Bridge-E platform was released I called it a power-house bound to set some new records. That statement was so right as the two extra logical processor cores make all the difference.

The Experience

Unfortunately for Intel, with Ivy Bridge-E the processor might have received a die shrink, but the performance remains roughly the same. I'll advance that statement even further, ever since the Gulftown (Core i7 980X) back in 2010 release, performance wise nothing much has changed in terms of raw per core performance. Intel has not been able to make big steps any more as again the performance difference inbetween the 3960X and this 4960X is maybe 10% at best.

Now I am talking raw CPU performance here, but as an example let me take Handbrake transcoding (higher = better) as virtual example:

  • The Gulftown Core i7 980X pushed out 28 FPS in 2010.
  • The Sandy Bridge-E based Core i7 3960X pushed 30 20 2011.
  • Now the Ivy Bridge-E Core i7 4960X manages 33 transcoded frames per second in 2013.

You need to wonder, what happened to the raw processor performance increase? This is not exactly Moore's Law anymore. That's gonna be hard to justify the 1000 USD price tag if you ask me. Now my comment here only applies to the 4960X really. That said, the 4930K (555 USD) and four core 4820K (310 USD) will be the products that are the more interesting onces as far as I can predict.

Now I understand the above is a bit of a weird statement to make for a start in the conclusion, but yeah it is the reality. That doesn't mean though that we also have to acknowledge that Intel's six-core processors are as fast as a lightning bolt, really, it's just seriously fast stuff and offers great fun for the enthusiast PC user. But ever since a couple of years people do not feel they need to upgrade anymore, as the performance stays roughly the same. This is a huge part of the problem why the industry is seeing much less desktop PC sales, nothing is really advancing to a new level of performance. 

Overall Performance

The overall per core performance remains seriously nice, Turbo 2.0 kicks in nicely up-to 4.0 GHz. For the professional user who uses heavily threaded software like content creation, that's where Ivy Bridge-E will make a difference. Add to that quad-channel memory with near silly bandwidth and plenty of PCIe lanes and you'll have a platform that will be hard to beat. The Intel X79 chipset is by all means sufficient, but it is dated. I would have loved to see more chipset based SATA3 ports and native USB 3.0 ports amongst others. The manufacturers will adapt and react to that, the MSI X79A-GD65 motherboard used in today's review offers everything you wish and much more. However, the minute the manufacturers have to add ICs and compensate for the chipset, the more components are used driving prices upwards -- and that will make a Ivy Bridge-E PC very expensive.

So while I had hopes for a bigger more extensive step in raw processor performance, Ivy Bridge-E however remains to be a ridiculously fast platform. It is just as impressive as the Sandy Bridge-E platform, but not that different at all. Comparing Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E however is a tough thing to do. Both remain very close in both performance, features and overclock potential. I dare say that Sandy-Bridge-E might even be the better processor for overclockers as temperatures do look a notch better.

Final Words

Remember if you decide to upgrade the processor on your X79 towards Ivy Bruidge-E then update your BIOS first. Without proper support, your motherboard otherwise would not even boot. From A to Z it testing this processor was a very pleasant to test and tweak with. And that's really what high-end gear is all about. But realistically, the next gen E processors really need to be faster or get more cores for Intel to make a substantial enough difference. Still, this is great stuff to have in your uber-powered, enthusiast, l33t gaming rig alright. But if you already are on X79 with Sandy-Bridge-E, I just do not see a significant enough reason for you to upgrade. And as stated, the 4930K (555 USD ) and four core 4820K (310 USD) will be the products that are the more interesting onces we predict. Lucky you, we have a review on the 4820K ready as well.

Handy related downloads: 

    • Prime95
    • SiSoft Sandra
    • AIDA
    • CPU-Z
    • HWMonitor

  • Sign up to receive a notice when we publish a new article
  • Or go back to Guru3D's front page.



20 pages « < 17 18 19 20



Related Articles
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
We're back at eight Cypress Cove cores, this we test a cheaper priced model, the Core i7 11700KF. That K means it is unlocked, that F means better value as you can shave off a few bucks, this proces...

Intel Core i7 9700K processor review
It is time to review that secondary Coffee Lake-S refresh release, in this review, we put some blisters on the Core i7 9700K. This is the higher end mainstream processor. With eight cores it is aimed ...

Retro review: Intel Sandy Bridge Core i7 2600K - 2018 review
It was 2011 when Intel released Sandy Bridge, so we grab Core i7 2600K and revisit it in the year 2018, apply Windows 10 and compare that Core i7 2600K towards Ryzen 1800X and Core i7 8700K through o...

Intel Core i7 8700K processor review
It is time to check out the new six-core proc from Intel, yes the Core i7 8700K will be put through our benchmark paces and yes this is Coffee Lake, Intel's new mainstream processor that you will ne...

© 2022