Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide

New Downloads
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH27.20.100.9313
HWiNFO Download v6.43 - 4380 Beta


New Forum Topics
Who needs a 3080 if you can get GeForce Now.. NVIDIA Re-Confirms Resizable BAR Support on RTX 30 Series Radeon RX 6700 XT would have a starting price of 479 USD and see better availability Next-gen AMD EPYC (Genoa) Would get 50% larger socket SP5, 96 cores and 400W TDP Cant Choose A Replacment Board For My i7-4790 Non K Did anybody here get a refund from Intel or OEM for heartbeat etc? ASUS outs Thunderbolt EX4 PCI-Express3.0 (x4) ThunderBolt card Introducing FLEM - The Legacy Modder for legacy DirectX 9 and 10 cards. RDNA2 RX6000 Series Owners Thread, Tests, Mods, BIOS & Tweaks ! Monster Hunter Rise coming to PC in early 2022




Guru3D.com » Review » Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review » Page 1

Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review - Article - Guide - Review

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/06/2015 07:52 PM [ 5] 125 comment(s)

Tweet

Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 grapics performance

Yeah, it is time for the once in a year opportunity and yearly cash-cow from Activision and the treyarch studios, the latest iteration of Call of Duty Black Ops 3 has been released. Call of Duty: Black Ops III is a military science fiction first-person shooter video game, developed by Treyarch and published by Activision.It is the twelfth (yep you read that well - 12th) iteration of the Call of Duty series and the sequel to the 2012 video game Call of Duty: Black Ops II. It is released on several platforms, ours .. Microsoft Windows and then PlayStation 4, and Xbox One. For this article we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark thr game. We have a look at DX11 performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies. This article will cover benchmarks in the sense of average framerates, qwe'll look at all popular resolutions scaling from Full HD (1920x1080/1200), WHQD (2560x1440 and of course that big-whopper of a resolution Ultra HD. UHDTV (2160p) is 3840 pixels wide by 2160 pixels tall (8.29 megapixels), which is four times as many pixels as 1920x1080 (2.07 megapixels). 

Black Ops III will be a popular title and is looking OK from a graphics point of view. The release of Call of Duty remains a little weird for the PC as it is only 64-bit, and thus that requires a 64-bit operating system- this in fact eliminates a number of customers. A second requirement for the game is that you need to have at least 6 GB of memory. If you have 3 or 4 GB installed, the game will not start-up, but for previous releases patches inevitably did fix this and 4 GB at one point was allowed. The game engine itself is fairly equal to the its predecessor and with all tricks and bells enabled, it does look okay if your graphics card can manage it of course. COD however always is tricky to benchmark as the results are and always will be a little unreliable. One test run will result on 40 FPS, the second 36 FPS and another 33 FPS. Then another factor is a need to be taken into account as well, some levels average out at say 40 FPS, yet there are a handful of scenes (with helicopters and such) where the frame rate will crumble down. Now 80% of the game plays with good playable framerates, but a handful of levels will just stall any graphics card whatsoever.  

Important note:

This morning For the 6 hours straight I had been trying to retrieve reliable FPS numbers from the game, but as it stands it is a bit of a mess. Framerates fly up and down per mission / scene and are all over the place. Sometimes 30 FPS, and the next second 60 FPS. Sometimes measuring 1902x1080 and 2560x1440 will retrieve the very same FPS (while VSYNC is off), and next to that the Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 executable often crashes during start-up of the game. Selecting the AA modes does not have a performance impact whatsoever, which makes me wonder if they actually work as configured.

The game is not bad when is works, 8GB RAM memory systems you will get full RAM utilization as if the game is caching to the max. We did not get many stutters opposed to what it reported on the WWW though. With our 16GB system things definitely felt and ran a notch better. From a graphics point of view the game digs DEEPLY into your framerate when you open up all graphics quality settings, it will have an adverse effect on game performance. The problem however remains, the game looks good ... but remains to be just that -- nothing excels in PC graphics quality to a level that amazes.When it works the game does run smooth enough on pretty much any modern age graphics card. 

So the results you see today are INDICATIVE and not precise. This game is a mess to measure. We found a sweet spot setting that works pretty good and measure in a level (In Darkness Quarantine Zone, Singapore) that allows fairly consistent frame-rates. However the number you see WILL change even your GTX 980 TI or Fury X at one point will drop to 30 FPS These means that the results shown today are indicative, not a precise measurement by any standard. 

We'll show you graphics cards tested on three resolutions, Full HD (1920x1080), WHQD (2560x1440) and Ultra HD (3840 pixels × 2160 lines) along with some FCATS as well.

 




9 pages 1 2 3 4 next »



Related Articles
Call of Duty: WW2: PC graphics analysis benchmark review
It's time to check out that PC release of Call of Duty: WW2 for Windows relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are bein...

Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare PC graphics benchmark review
It's that time of the year, Call of Duty in it's Infinite Warfare glory has been released. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards ...

Call of Duty: Black Ops III PC graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Black Ops III. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the new t...

Call of Duty Advanced Warfare VGA graphics performance benchmark review
It is that time of the year again, we take out a dozen or so graphics cards and benchmark Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Join us in this article where many graphics cards are being tested with the ne...

© 2021