Return to the frontpage Read all the latest news-items on one page Download drivers, demo's, patches, tools in our huge file-section Our game reviews Our articles and guides Our latest hardware reviews and tests Return to homepage Be one of the 150.000 users discussing in our forums Search specific things in our news and articles
 

News category: » Graphics Cards - item: GeForce 9600GT Benchmarks Leaked



GeForce 9600GT Benchmarks Leaked
By Hilbert Hagedoorn, January 20, 2008 - 8:10 PM


 

It seems that it's impossible for NVIDIA to keep information under control these days as with each and any release some dodgy website will end up with a card one way or the other. Earlier this week the first preliminary results on GeForce 9600 GT (codename D9X) leaked onto the web by way of an online review. Chinese review site PC Online was able to put the new reference card to the test to see if it can keep up with the competition from ATI.

Appearantly to PC Online the 9600GT will come factory configured with a core clock speed of 650 MHz, a unified shader clock speed of 1625 MHz, and an 1800 MHz memory clock. From the photographs it looks like 512MB of GDDR3 1000 MHz memory is connected to the GPU by way of a 256-bit bus with a memory bandwidth of 57.6 GB/s. The G94 chip will also offer 64 unified stream processors; double the number on the 8600GT and half the number on the 8800 series.

The photographs show a smaller GPU die size than the G92 chips but slightly larger than the G84 die. PC Online was able to measure the performance of the 9600GT and the results confirmed NVIDIA's claims of a 100% performance increase over the 8600 series for the most part. The 9600 GT reached an overall score of 10813 while the 8600GTS and 8800GS had scores of 6251 and 10391, respectively.

Obviously at the actual launch we'll bring you guys full trustworthy reviews on the upcoming mid-range graphics adapters from NVIDIA.




 


Reader comments  
aelfwyne Report this post  Edit this post
1/20/2008 4:14 pm

I'm not trying to be a fanboi or anything, because I do recognize that AMD/ATI have been lagging behind seriously of late.

However - why did you guys choose a 256mb part for the AMD/ATI video card side? That's hardly a useful comparison.

Æther Tech Report this post  Edit this post
1/20/2008 6:32 pm

Ask the chinese site that did the review, not G3d/

aelfwyne Report this post  Edit this post
1/20/2008 6:37 pm

My bad, you're right. Didn't realize the benchmark was from another site.

Still, the comparison is not really valid without a comparable part. Still useful I suppose, of course we know the new part will always be faster.

     Edit this post Post your comment ...


 

previous page

homepage

 

Check lowest prices on these products in Guru3D.com price guide, among the available categories: Retail & OEM Processors - Video Cards - Motherboards - Memory - Soundcards - Hard Drives - Monitors - Printers - DVDs - CD-RWs - PDAs and more !

Copyright (c) 1997-2009 Hilbert Hagedoorn, All Rights Reserved. Webdesign by Mohsin Ali - Legal disclaimer/notice
The Guru of 3D, the Hardware guru, and 3D Guru are the trademark ownership of Hilbert Hagedoorn.



  Site Navigation
   Home
   Latest News
   Submit News
   Hardware Reviews
   Articles & Guides
   VGA Charts new
   Game Reviews
   Forums
   Download Section
   Guru3D Price Grabber
   Guru Price Grabber UK
   Guru PC Buyers Guide
   Guru3D Stereo Section
   Guru3D Clan
   Guru3D Folding@Home
   Contact us
   Join our news-letter
   Set as Homepage
 

  Affiliates

RivaTuner
nVHardPage
3DMark Vantage
SiSoft SANDRA
Guru3D Driver Sweeper
nVTempLogger
ATI Tray Tools

Guru3D Rig of the Month
  Links
Driver Scan
Registry Booster 2010
Your company ?
  Downloads
NVIDIA GeForce drivers
ATI Catalyst drivers
Benchmarks & Demo's
Game Demo's
NVIDIA Chipset drivers
Intel Chipset drivers