The Judge who presided over the first successful prosecution of an
American P2P file sharer has hinted that he has changed his mind - and
may nullify the trial.
Jammie Thomas sold her knickers online (see pic) after being
convicted of copyright infringement last year. A jury of her peers in
Duluth, Minnesota wasn't impressed by what they regarded as a
time-wasting trial, when she should have copped to a small fine:
"Her defense sucked... I don't know what the censored (oops - hehe) she was thinking, to
tell you the truth," said jury member Michael Hegg at the time.
But now Judge Davis thinks that the basis of the record companies'
pursuit of file-sharers sucks, too. It hinges on the prosecution's use
of the "making available" argument. Last October, the prosecution
successfully argued that leaving songs in a shared folder on a network
means making them available, leaving the sharer liable for infringement
damages. That's what Judge Davis told the Duluth jury, too. The problem
is, the Copyright Act doesn't use the words "making available".
What the Act does do, however, is define five exclusive rights in
the copyright 'bundle': Reproduction, adaptation, publication,
performance and display. And for sound recordings, it defines
"publication" as "offering to distribute copies or phonorecords to a
group of persons for purposes of further distribution, public
performance, or public display".
Which seems clear enough.
But the courts have expressed differing views on the matter. Within
the space of a fortnight earlier this year, we saw two courts accept
the argument that shared folders aren't publication while another
World's Smallest 1080p HD Camcorder - 04/04/2008 08:50 AM
Meant more for geeky vacationers than pros, Sony's calling its HDR-TG1 Handycam the world's smallest "full HD" camcorder, packing 10 ounces into a 1.3 x 4.7 x 2.5-inch titanium frame. Sony i...