Riotoro Prism CR1280 Full Tower RGB review
ASUS TUF X299 Mark 1 review
BitFenix Nova TG review
ADATA SX8000 M.2 512 GB SSD Review
F1 2017: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 FCAT Analysis
Fractal Design Meshify C review
MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon AC review
HP S700 Pro 1 TB SSD review
Gigabyte ATC700 AORUS CPU cooler review
Nvidia Outs Call of Duty: Ghosts System Specs and they are HEAVY
Now this is interesting, Nvidia announced the pending Call of Duty: Ghosts System Specs requirements. And they are stringent alright. Call of Duty: Ghosts will be released November 5th and will run on 64-bit only with Windows 7 or 8. The PC version of the shooter will require at least a Core 2 Duo E8200 at 2,66 GHz or a Phenom X3 8750 at 2,4 GHz. Minimum VGA requirements are a GeForce GTX 550 Ti or ATI Radeon HD 5870. Also this one, 6 GB system memory ? Oh and hey, the game needs 50GB of install size! We smell Ultra High Definition texture packs here folks - Woohoo !
Call of Duty: Ghosts is the tenth release in the series by infinity Ward.
Minimum System Requirements
- OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit
- CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 2.66 GHZ / AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4 GHZ or better
- RAM: 6 GB RAM
- HDD: 50 GB HD space
- Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti / ATI Radeon HD 5870 or better
- Sound: DirectX Compatible Sound Card
- DirectX: 11
- Internet: Broadband connection and service required for Multiplayer Connectivity. Internet connection required for activation.
Recommended System Requirements
- Video: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
This time around GeForce GTX-powered PCs receive the definitive Call of Duty: Ghosts experience thanks to NVIDIA-exclusive technologies and features, such as TXAA Anti-Aliasing, 3D Vision, SLI and PhysX, which adds incredible effects to Activision's next-gen first-person shooter.
NVIDIA on Tomb Raider performance issues - 03/10/2013 08:45 PM
NVIDIA made a small statement that acknowledges the performance issues of Tomb Raider on GeForce graphics cards. The new Tomb Raider game is an AMD Gaming Evolved title, and NVIDIA claims it didn't r...
NVIDIA on GeForce GTX 680 voltage control restrictions - 10/08/2012 06:25 AM
Last week You all learned that
NVIDIA on Kepler V-Sync Stuttering Issue - 05/20/2012 10:16 AM
Users of NVIDIA GeForce Kepler-based graphics cards have been reporting intermittent stuttering in games, with v-sync enabled. Technically, the problem seems to be a driver issue that results in visua...
NVIDIA Opens Up CUDA by Releasing Compiler Source Code - 12/14/2011 01:45 PM
NVIDIA today announced that it will provide the source code for the new NVIDIA CUDA LLVM-based compiler to academic researchers and software-tool vendors, enabling them to more easily add GPU support ...
nVIDIA outs low-end GeForce GT420 - 09/04/2010 02:03 AM
NVIDIA GeForce GT 420 GPU is the new low-end solution for internet and office users who choose to live a tranquil life without the disturbing noises of the fans. This pretty much means that you have t...
Darkest
Posts: 10044
Joined: 2003-03-25
Posts: 10044
Joined: 2003-03-25
#4671828 Posted on: 10/08/2013 08:21 PM
Click to extend and view the top 100. There's over 40,000 people currently playing various releases of it as of my posting this according to Steam. Not sure if there's anything like that for Origin.
there's allot of steam users but nothing about cod i see a top 10 player count but nothing about cod? so is there a comparison to cod for pc player count vs console? that would be more on the subject. you got a list for how many origin users there are too?
Click to extend and view the top 100. There's over 40,000 people currently playing various releases of it as of my posting this according to Steam. Not sure if there's anything like that for Origin.
sykozis
Posts: 20009
Joined: 2008-07-14
Posts: 20009
Joined: 2008-07-14
#4671845 Posted on: 10/08/2013 08:42 PM
As I know more than 5 people who play CoD (on PC no less)...those same people would ditch PC in a second for console simply to avoid upgrades.
I think what he meant to say is only 5 CoD fans would find the game requirements to too much of a turnoff to get the game.
As I know more than 5 people who play CoD (on PC no less)...those same people would ditch PC in a second for console simply to avoid upgrades.
Aura89
Posts: 6316
Joined: 2008-07-31
Posts: 6316
Joined: 2008-07-31
#4671858 Posted on: 10/08/2013 09:03 PM
Holy...50GB!? That must be a first in gaming history!
i believe it was the first star wars force unleashed that took 50gb, i could be wrong
On that note, for PC games that required a disc to run, I never understood why they weren't used to load (live) some in-game content, such as music or cutscenes. Both of those take up a considerable amount of disk space but can easily be loaded from an optical disc without slowing down the game. If anything, doing this would improve load speeds, since it's 1 less thing for the HDD to be working on.
No, No, NO!, i do NOT WANT to have to keep track of the stupid discs because someone felt it was better to keep data on the disc, absolutely NOT.
Also, you have very little storage for this day in age....low end laptops can have more then yours easily, stock, and even those that don't...come quite close...there's no reason for such a low amount of storage, especially since the price for them is ridiculously high comparatively (per gb)
Holy...50GB!? That must be a first in gaming history!
i believe it was the first star wars force unleashed that took 50gb, i could be wrong
On that note, for PC games that required a disc to run, I never understood why they weren't used to load (live) some in-game content, such as music or cutscenes. Both of those take up a considerable amount of disk space but can easily be loaded from an optical disc without slowing down the game. If anything, doing this would improve load speeds, since it's 1 less thing for the HDD to be working on.
No, No, NO!, i do NOT WANT to have to keep track of the stupid discs because someone felt it was better to keep data on the disc, absolutely NOT.
Also, you have very little storage for this day in age....low end laptops can have more then yours easily, stock, and even those that don't...come quite close...there's no reason for such a low amount of storage, especially since the price for them is ridiculously high comparatively (per gb)
Passion Fruit
Posts: 6004
Joined: 2005-10-10
Posts: 6004
Joined: 2005-10-10
#4671859 Posted on: 10/08/2013 09:04 PM
If you ask me it still looks similar and the game play looks eerily very similar despite all this tripe about the engine. Probably just a marketing ploy
No COD is using a heavily optimized graphics engine in this round. This should be really good. Just have a peek at some of the screenshots in the news item.
If you ask me it still looks similar and the game play looks eerily very similar despite all this tripe about the engine. Probably just a marketing ploy
TirolokoRD
Posts: 1934
Joined: 2005-01-17
Posts: 1934
Joined: 2005-01-17
#4671872 Posted on: 10/08/2013 09:37 PM
Again, how many discs maybe 5? or a Bluray!?
Again, how many discs maybe 5? or a Bluray!?
Mohammad.Taheri
Posts: 255
Joined: 2010-11-07
Posts: 255
Joined: 2010-11-07
#4671874 Posted on: 10/08/2013 09:43 PM
no, 27338 FLOPPY DISK OR 56 CD OR 8 DVD OR 2 BLURAY DIIIIISK
Again, how many discs maybe 5? or a Bluray!?
no, 27338 FLOPPY DISK OR 56 CD OR 8 DVD OR 2 BLURAY DIIIIISK
boodikon
Posts: 3735
Joined: 2005-10-30
Posts: 3735
Joined: 2005-10-30
#4671888 Posted on: 10/08/2013 10:05 PM
I hope the hit detection has been improved also is this a new engine or is it still loosely based on q3 engine.
I hope the hit detection has been improved also is this a new engine or is it still loosely based on q3 engine.
DesGaizu
Posts: 3600
Joined: 2010-09-15
Posts: 3600
Joined: 2010-09-15
#4671894 Posted on: 10/08/2013 10:10 PM
It's based on a engine that was based on a engine that was based on q3 engine.
I hope the hit detection has been improved also is this a new engine or is it still loosely based on q3 engine.
It's based on a engine that was based on a engine that was based on q3 engine.
boodikon
Posts: 3735
Joined: 2005-10-30
Posts: 3735
Joined: 2005-10-30
#4671900 Posted on: 10/08/2013 10:14 PM
http://n4g.com/news/1369999/eminems-video-for-survival-is-just-a-commercial-for-call-of-duty
Eminem’s video for “Survival” is just a commercial for Call of Duty
http://n4g.com/news/1369999/eminems-video-for-survival-is-just-a-commercial-for-call-of-duty
Eminem’s video for “Survival” is just a commercial for Call of Duty
nhlkoho
Posts: 7122
Joined: 2005-12-06
Posts: 7122
Joined: 2005-12-06
#4671913 Posted on: 10/08/2013 10:25 PM
That new amazing fish AI they added must take a lot of processing power
That new amazing fish AI they added must take a lot of processing power
Dillinger
Posts: 655
Joined: 2012-07-29
Posts: 655
Joined: 2012-07-29
#4671916 Posted on: 10/08/2013 10:35 PM
So they're implying that a GTX 550 Ti is on par with an HD 5870? Riiiiight...
I've owned an HD 5870 and it was a beast at the time...as for the 550 Ti?...it was trash.
GTX 550 Ti OC is slower than an HD 5770, hah!
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-550-ti-review-msi-cyclone-ii-oc,10.html
Visually this doesn't look much better than MW2...I'd say BFBC2 looks better than this so there is no way a 5870 would be considered minimum spec.
If anything a 5870 should run this game maxed out at 1080p with high frame rates...unless they purposely made it run worse on ATi/AMD cards
So they're implying that a GTX 550 Ti is on par with an HD 5870? Riiiiight...
I've owned an HD 5870 and it was a beast at the time...as for the 550 Ti?...it was trash.
GTX 550 Ti OC is slower than an HD 5770, hah!
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-gtx-550-ti-review-msi-cyclone-ii-oc,10.html
Visually this doesn't look much better than MW2...I'd say BFBC2 looks better than this so there is no way a 5870 would be considered minimum spec.
If anything a 5870 should run this game maxed out at 1080p with high frame rates...unless they purposely made it run worse on ATi/AMD cards
rodrigoles
Posts: 212
Joined: 2013-06-13
Posts: 212
Joined: 2013-06-13
#4671934 Posted on: 10/08/2013 11:13 PM
crysis 3 is what ? 20 gb?
And it looks like a generation ahead of cod.
seriously, why on Earth would you need a gtx 780 to max this sh!t
There must be some serious physx in this game, like that witcher 3 fur applied on the dogs.
crysis 3 is what ? 20 gb?
And it looks like a generation ahead of cod.
seriously, why on Earth would you need a gtx 780 to max this sh!t
There must be some serious physx in this game, like that witcher 3 fur applied on the dogs.
nick0323
Posts: 846
Joined: 2010-02-24
Posts: 846
Joined: 2010-02-24
#4671936 Posted on: 10/08/2013 11:15 PM
As we move forwards with PC games, makers are starting to heavily focus on image quality which leads to overall a larger game size.
I've kept all my games on a 320GB HDD which I recently had to upgrade to a 1TB just because of games like COD where the graphics look nice and you get 8 hours of game play. Length of game play aside and the game play is good.
As we move forwards with PC games, makers are starting to heavily focus on image quality which leads to overall a larger game size.
I've kept all my games on a 320GB HDD which I recently had to upgrade to a 1TB just because of games like COD where the graphics look nice and you get 8 hours of game play. Length of game play aside and the game play is good.
Anarion
Posts: 12921
Joined: 2005-08-13
Posts: 12921
Joined: 2005-08-13
#4671937 Posted on: 10/08/2013 11:16 PM
i believe it was the first star wars force unleashed that took 50gb, i could be wrong
It's 28,9 GB. Videos are by far the largest chunk in that: 7,89 GB.
i believe it was the first star wars force unleashed that took 50gb, i could be wrong
It's 28,9 GB. Videos are by far the largest chunk in that: 7,89 GB.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 1949
Joined: 2006-02-23
I think what he meant to say is only 5 CoD fans would find the game requirements to too much of a turnoff to get the game.
thank you......you are smart you like good things