Palit GeForce GTX 780 Ti Jetstream Review
Func KB-460 Review
Corsair Vengeance K95 keyboard review
Gigabyte Radeon R9-290X review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2013
ASRock Z87 Fatal1ty Killer motherboard review
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 Ti SC SuperClocked ACX Review
OCZ Fatal1ty 750W PSU review
ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 760 MARS review
HIS Radeon R9-290X review
JPG images with IE11 on Windows 8.1 is 45 percent faster
by
on: 09/16/2013 07:26 AM | Source |
29 comment(s) ]
Windows 8.1 is just a few weeks away from its official October 18th launch date and Microsoft has begun promoting some of the improvements it has made to Internet Explorer 11. This week, Microsoft has revealed that the browser has a new image decoding pipeline, claiming it greatly increases the speed of downloading JPG images from websites.
In a post on the official IE blog, Microsoft says that images take up 61 percent of all of the data downloaded from websites, and that 47 percent of web images are JPG files. Microsoft claims that their new method downloads JPG images up to 45 percent faster in IE11, on Windows 8.1, compared with older IE versions.
In other words, IE browsers have been lagging behind for years, and will obtain normal rendering speed with the newest update ;-)
Segamon
Newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: 2008-11-03
Newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: 2008-11-03
#4656092 Posted on: 09/16/2013 12:04 PM
good but what about stability?
good but what about stability?
Solfaur
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3627
Joined: 2005-08-10
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3627
Joined: 2005-08-10
#4656125 Posted on: 09/16/2013 12:59 PM
I have both IE and google chrome installed in case of incompatilities but chrome is by far my favourite.
I have both IE and google chrome installed in case of incompatilities but chrome is by far my favourite.
StewieTech
Chuck Norris
Posts: 979
Joined: 2012-02-06
Chuck Norris
Posts: 979
Joined: 2012-02-06
#4656131 Posted on: 09/16/2013 01:07 PM
"In other words, IE browsers have been lagging behind for years, and will obtain normal rendering speed with the newest update ;-)"
Haha. You so bad.
"In other words, IE browsers have been lagging behind for years, and will obtain normal rendering speed with the newest update ;-)"
Haha. You so bad.
lucidus
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4732
Joined: 2011-12-31
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4732
Joined: 2011-12-31
#4656139 Posted on: 09/16/2013 01:19 PM
In other words, IE browsers have been lagging behind for years, and will obtain normal rendering speed with the newest update ;-)
Lol Hibert
I'm happy with Palemoon and sticking with IE9 for some sites that require it 
In other words, IE browsers have been lagging behind for years, and will obtain normal rendering speed with the newest update ;-)
Lol Hibert
I'm happy with Palemoon and sticking with IE9 for some sites that require it
Elder III
Maha Guru
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2010-05-16
Maha Guru
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2010-05-16
#4656174 Posted on: 09/16/2013 02:21 PM
I think the last sentence sums it up pretty well.
I think the last sentence sums it up pretty well.
Extraordinary
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4656183 Posted on: 09/16/2013 02:36 PM
IE11 is horrendous, you have to add Google to list of compatibility sites if you want Google Images to work properly
Don't see how they can promote it being good if you can't use it natively
IE11 is horrendous, you have to add Google to list of compatibility sites if you want Google Images to work properly
Don't see how they can promote it being good if you can't use it natively
Ven0m
Maha Guru
Posts: 1120
Joined: 2005-08-12
Maha Guru
Posts: 1120
Joined: 2005-08-12
#4656240 Posted on: 09/16/2013 04:43 PM
IE11 is horrendous, you have to add Google to list of compatibility sites if you want Google Images to work properly
Don't see how they can promote it being good if you can't use it natively
If you make a site that detects specific browser and in such case presents content that isn't rendered in a way that the user expects it, it's difficult to blame the browser vendor.
While IE hasn't got the best opinion by looking at IE5.5 and IE6-related compatibility issues, the newer versions are significantly better. I use Chrome as my primary browser, and IE and Firefox from time to time. It wasn't a difficult choice for me as (at least on my machines) Chrome and IE have speed, Chrome and Firefox have addons, so that makes Chrome the only good option with both speed and addons. But I can fully understand people using IE as their primary browser. There's nothing to be ashamed of.
IE11 is horrendous, you have to add Google to list of compatibility sites if you want Google Images to work properly
Don't see how they can promote it being good if you can't use it natively
If you make a site that detects specific browser and in such case presents content that isn't rendered in a way that the user expects it, it's difficult to blame the browser vendor.
While IE hasn't got the best opinion by looking at IE5.5 and IE6-related compatibility issues, the newer versions are significantly better. I use Chrome as my primary browser, and IE and Firefox from time to time. It wasn't a difficult choice for me as (at least on my machines) Chrome and IE have speed, Chrome and Firefox have addons, so that makes Chrome the only good option with both speed and addons. But I can fully understand people using IE as their primary browser. There's nothing to be ashamed of.
Extraordinary
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4656243 Posted on: 09/16/2013 04:49 PM
If you make a site that detects specific browser and in such case presents content that isn't rendered in a way that the user expects it, it's difficult to blame the browser vendor.
While IE hasn't got the best opinion by looking at IE5.5 and IE6-related compatibility issues, the newer versions are significantly better. I use Chrome as my primary browser, and IE and Firefox from time to time. It wasn't a difficult choice for me as (at least on my machines) Chrome and IE have speed, Chrome and Firefox have addons, so that makes Chrome the only good option with both speed and addons. But I can fully understand people using IE as their primary browser. There's nothing to be ashamed of.
I do blame the browser vendor, Google Images works fine in Chrome and Firefox and any other browser I have tried
I doesn't work in IE11 without compatibility mode
This has nothing to do with being ashamed of using IE, its pure and simple that it is the inferior browser compared to Chrome and FF in all senses
If you make a site that detects specific browser and in such case presents content that isn't rendered in a way that the user expects it, it's difficult to blame the browser vendor.
While IE hasn't got the best opinion by looking at IE5.5 and IE6-related compatibility issues, the newer versions are significantly better. I use Chrome as my primary browser, and IE and Firefox from time to time. It wasn't a difficult choice for me as (at least on my machines) Chrome and IE have speed, Chrome and Firefox have addons, so that makes Chrome the only good option with both speed and addons. But I can fully understand people using IE as their primary browser. There's nothing to be ashamed of.
I do blame the browser vendor, Google Images works fine in Chrome and Firefox and any other browser I have tried
I doesn't work in IE11 without compatibility mode
This has nothing to do with being ashamed of using IE, its pure and simple that it is the inferior browser compared to Chrome and FF in all senses
chanw4
Maha Guru
Posts: 2104
Joined: 2008-07-03
Maha Guru
Posts: 2104
Joined: 2008-07-03
#4656249 Posted on: 09/16/2013 04:52 PM
Its a nightmare to develop for IE when the same site works differently in IE 6, 7, 8 and 9 and then flat out doesn't work without compatibility mode on IE10 when chrome and Firefox works fine. You think developer likes to add browser detection code and routine to the site?
Its a nightmare to develop for IE when the same site works differently in IE 6, 7, 8 and 9 and then flat out doesn't work without compatibility mode on IE10 when chrome and Firefox works fine. You think developer likes to add browser detection code and routine to the site?
Labyrinth
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3669
Joined: 2008-07-15
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3669
Joined: 2008-07-15
#4656257 Posted on: 09/16/2013 05:04 PM
Windows 8 only?
Windows 8 only?
Extraordinary
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3636
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4656258 Posted on: 09/16/2013 05:05 PM
I think Windows 7 and Windows 8.1
iirc Windows 8 is not getting IE11
Windows 8 only?
I think Windows 7 and Windows 8.1
iirc Windows 8 is not getting IE11
DLD
Master Guru
Posts: 468
Joined: 2002-09-14
Master Guru
Posts: 468
Joined: 2002-09-14
#4656316 Posted on: 09/16/2013 07:20 PM
we all knew that IE is a perfect browser for...downloading installations of FFox or/and Chrome.
Now we know that it is not the end of story, by far - IE is capable of downloading JPG photos... And it does it FAST! Whoa! Is IE capable of downloading GIF photos too? How about .txt files? What a relief, what a mighty browser...
we all knew that IE is a perfect browser for...downloading installations of FFox or/and Chrome.
Now we know that it is not the end of story, by far - IE is capable of downloading JPG photos... And it does it FAST! Whoa! Is IE capable of downloading GIF photos too? How about .txt files? What a relief, what a mighty browser...
Redemption80
Ancient Guru
Posts: 14130
Joined: 2009-01-06
Ancient Guru
Posts: 14130
Joined: 2009-01-06
#4656325 Posted on: 09/16/2013 07:38 PM
I haven't had any issues with IE11 when testing, though the fact I didn't know about the Google images thing means I haven't done that much testing.
Netflix in HTML5 works very well though, and is the only way to get 1080p in a browser as far as I know.
Certainly rate it above Firefox though, as that has been junk for far too long now.
I haven't had any issues with IE11 when testing, though the fact I didn't know about the Google images thing means I haven't done that much testing.
Netflix in HTML5 works very well though, and is the only way to get 1080p in a browser as far as I know.
Certainly rate it above Firefox though, as that has been junk for far too long now.
lucidus
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4732
Joined: 2011-12-31
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4732
Joined: 2011-12-31
#4656327 Posted on: 09/16/2013 07:44 PM
Certainly rate it above Firefox though, as that has been junk for far too long now.
Yeah, I don't know what Mozilla is up to. It is the default Tor Browser and it's sluggish as always.
Certainly rate it above Firefox though, as that has been junk for far too long now.
Yeah, I don't know what Mozilla is up to. It is the default Tor Browser and it's sluggish as always.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Ancient Guru
Posts: 9886
Joined: 2005-08-13
Hey, hey now! Firefox is by far the most sluggish browser in actual use these days and scrolling is generally far from smooth (the verge for example is pain to use with firefox).