MSI GeForce GTX 770 Gaming review
ASUS Maximus VI Extreme Z87 motherboard review
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review
Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 review
Corsair Vengeance K70 review
MSI GeForce GTX 770 Lightning review
EVGA GeForce GTX 770 SC review
Plextor M5M 256GB mSATA SSD review
AMD A10 6800K review
SanDisk Extreme II 120 - 240 and 480 GB SSD review
Galaxy GeForce GT 630 Graphics Card
Galaxy is bringing you their latest graphics card, the GeForce GT 630. Codenamed GF PGT630/2GD3, the card features 96 CUDA Cores, a 128-bit memory interface, a core clock of 810MHz, a shader clock of 1620MHz and a 2GB DDR3 memory set @ 1334MHz, and features DVI-I, D-Sub and HDMI outputs.
The GF PGT630/2GD3 retails for 5,980 Yen (about $73).
Galaxy GeForce GTX 650 Green Edition - 10/19/2012 05:42 AM
Galaxy GeForce GTX 650 graphics card, the Green Edition. Not that the original models consume much power. The card however does not have any 6-pin PCIe power connectors and thus rely the PCIe bus for power which can deliver 75 Watts.
Galaxy GeForce GTX 650 Ti Black Edition - 10/11/2012 06:50 AM
A new GeForce GTX 650 Ti model from Galaxy has surfacedunder SKU name GTX 650 Ti Black Edition. This card comes pre-overclocked out of the box featuring a custom PCB. Based on the same GK106 core like other GTX 650 Ti cards, it packs 768 CUDA cores and 16 ROPs. The main difference comes with core clock, the Black edition comes with a core clock of 1006 MHz and memory is clocked at reference 5400 MHz.
Galaxy GeForce GTX 670 4 GB GC Edition Graphics Card - 07/19/2012 10:30 AM
Galaxy and thus in Europe, KFA2 are prepping a 4 GB overclocked version of GeForce GTX 670 and they are calling it GTX 670 4 GB GC Edition. The product will have a big dual fan cooler, custom PCB and...
Galaxy GeForce GTX 680 OC Graphics Card - 04/24/2012 09:40 AM
Galaxy is preparing to launch a new graphics namely the GeForce GTX 680 OC. Codenamed GF-PGTX680-OC/2GD5 DUAL-FAN, the card sports 1536 CUDA Cores, a 256-bit memory interface, a GPU clock of 1100MHz (...
Galaxy GeForce GTX 680 Hall of Fame Edition - 03/26/2012 09:47 AM
We just show the 4GB edition, but much like Zotac a n-epeen version is in the works as well, the Galaxy GeForce GTX 680 Hall of Fame Edition. Apparantly Galaxy has shown a prototype of this card.
The Goose
Maha Guru
Posts: 1294
Joined: 2008-02-25
Maha Guru
Posts: 1294
Joined: 2008-02-25
#4468251 Posted on: 12/01/2012 01:23 PM
96 cuda cores,gddr3 and pci-e 2.0...really....what is the point,ebay is full of cards for half the price and lots more power.
96 cuda cores,gddr3 and pci-e 2.0...really....what is the point,ebay is full of cards for half the price and lots more power.
MAD-OGRE
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2841
Joined: 2007-10-11
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2841
Joined: 2007-10-11
#4468379 Posted on: 12/01/2012 05:15 PM
I picked up a GT 630 for my HTPC works very well.
I picked up a GT 630 for my HTPC works very well.
sykozis
Ancient Guru
Posts: 13636
Joined: 2008-07-14
Ancient Guru
Posts: 13636
Joined: 2008-07-14
#4468404 Posted on: 12/01/2012 06:07 PM
The GeForce GT 630 is garbage at best. I brought the Gigabyte version to replace my sisters Radeon 2600XT and I was not impressed. Hell, even the 4650M in my laptop either bet it, or matched it in my testing, and the power consumption is not good at all! (375w iirc) I should also mention, tessellation was pathetic as well.
Lets put it this way: If an AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor can play Far Cry 2 on ultra at 1080p at 40FPS then the AMD IGP is better than that.
GT630 is an entry-level card. Why would you buy one for gaming?
The GeForce GT 630 is garbage at best. I brought the Gigabyte version to replace my sisters Radeon 2600XT and I was not impressed. Hell, even the 4650M in my laptop either bet it, or matched it in my testing, and the power consumption is not good at all! (375w iirc) I should also mention, tessellation was pathetic as well.
Lets put it this way: If an AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor can play Far Cry 2 on ultra at 1080p at 40FPS then the AMD IGP is better than that.
GT630 is an entry-level card. Why would you buy one for gaming?
Keitosha
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4380
Joined: 2004-11-16
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4380
Joined: 2004-11-16
#4468601 Posted on: 12/01/2012 11:14 PM
This seems like a rebranded GT430, which has the same specs.
This seems like a rebranded GT430, which has the same specs.
Mikedogg
Banned
Posts: 2872
Joined: 2011-11-01
Banned
Posts: 2872
Joined: 2011-11-01
#4468771 Posted on: 12/02/2012 04:02 AM
You might want to re-read my rant. I never said I brought it for gaming, but I thought what the hell, since I have it, I may as well see how it matches up.
I honestly thought it would be faster than my 4650 though. Guess not...
GT630 is an entry-level card. Why would you buy one for gaming?
You might want to re-read my rant. I never said I brought it for gaming, but I thought what the hell, since I have it, I may as well see how it matches up.
I honestly thought it would be faster than my 4650 though. Guess not...
killer_939
Maha Guru
Posts: 2595
Joined: 2005-04-10
Maha Guru
Posts: 2595
Joined: 2005-04-10
#4468808 Posted on: 12/02/2012 05:10 AM
Did they make it on 180nm fab or something? Thats crazy, even the 8800 Ultra with more unified shader cores (128) on 90nm was about half that and it was considered very high for its time.
On a serious note, low end cards are becoming a waste of time with modern integrated graphics being more and more viable.
and the power consumption is not good at all! (375w iirc)
Did they make it on 180nm fab or something? Thats crazy, even the 8800 Ultra with more unified shader cores (128) on 90nm was about half that and it was considered very high for its time.
On a serious note, low end cards are becoming a waste of time with modern integrated graphics being more and more viable.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Banned
Posts: 2872
Joined: 2011-11-01
The GeForce GT 630 is garbage at best. I brought the Gigabyte version to replace my sisters Radeon 2600XT and I was not impressed. Hell, even the 4650M in my laptop either bet it, or matched it in my testing, and the power consumption is not good at all! (375w iirc) I should also mention, tessellation was pathetic as well.
Lets put it this way: If an AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Quad-Core Processor can play Far Cry 2 on ultra at 1080p at 40FPS then the AMD IGP is better than that.