EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SC ACX review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 WindForce 3x OC review
GeForce GTX 780 SLI and Multi monitor review
GeForce GTX 780 review
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
Download Catzilla Benchmark BETA version
Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 12/19/2012 06:29 PM | 36 comment(s) ]
Here you can download Catzilla the BETA version of the benchmark. It’s being produced in collaboration with Polish post production company, Plastige, who worked on that Witcher 2 Enhanced Edition intro video. This benchmark is in beta phases. Catzilla is a cross-API benchmark designed for OpenGL 4.0 and DirectX 9 or 11, and the Windows platform (64-bit and 32-bit Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8).
Speed-test your workstation and watch a giant animated cat nuke cities with its laser eyes as you do. The benchmark uses a parallel graphics engine that takes advantage of multi-core CPUs.
A Teaser Video of the benchmark:
Download GeForce 310.70 WHQL - 12/18/2012 09:26 AM
GeForce 310.70 WHQL drivers are now available to download. The culmination of our recent beta releases, these WHQL-candidate drivers improve performance by up to 37% in the year's most popular games,...
Download Media Player Classic Home Cinema v1.6.5 - 12/17/2012 04:51 PM
Download Media Player Classic Home Cinema v1.6.5 This great open Source Media Player allows you to enhance, decode and accelerate a broad span of movie formats like x.264 with GPU assisted accelerati...
Download MediaPortal 1.3.0 Beta - 12/17/2012 10:44 AM
Download MediaPortal 1.3.0 - The vision of the MediaPortal project is to create a free open source media centre application, which supports all advanced media centre functions, and is accessible to a...
Intel HD Graphics Driver 15.28.10.2897 Windows 7 and 8 Download - 12/07/2012 01:49 PM
You can now Download Intel HD Graphics Driver for Windows 7 and 8. Version 15.28.10.2897 for Windows 7 and Windows 8. These drivers will not function with any other product. View the README file fo...
Download Crucial M4 040H Firmware - 12/05/2012 10:52 AM
More SSD Firmware update news today as Crucial has released a new firmware update for their M4 line. You can now download the Crucial M4 040H Firmware for the Crucial M4 2.5 SSD. Firmware for the C...
Extraordinary
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2010-04-21
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2765
Joined: 2010-04-21
#4483622 Posted on: 12/20/2012 04:13 PM
typeAlpha
Newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: 2012-06-10
Newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: 2012-06-10
#4483646 Posted on: 12/20/2012 04:44 PM
Love it lol
Why is my score so crap though : 4722 on Tiger preset
Edit : Got my score to around 5300 with an overclock on the gpu (1200/1300)
Love it lol
Why is my score so crap though : 4722 on Tiger preset
Edit : Got my score to around 5300 with an overclock on the gpu (1200/1300)
Lane
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2005-02-25
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2005-02-25
#4483653 Posted on: 12/20/2012 04:52 PM
Its funny, looking the animation of physic i was think it is bullet.
I start to understand why physic on GPU is diminished on AMD cards. I will try use AMDperfstudio or the nvidia nvperf for analyze the threads used and the calls. And i see they still dont know how to put on profit, the DP on shader computing. ( AMD perfstudio, not because AMD vs Nvidia, but it is yet the most accurate tools for analyse calls and threads on a sequence like that )
oups i see my first score is out of the top 10 now, will redo one for get back there. ( intitally was 4 ).
But visually, its surely the best benchmark we have seen this last year. Its a real little animation movie.
Looks like it uses Physx after all. 
Its funny, looking the animation of physic i was think it is bullet.
I start to understand why physic on GPU is diminished on AMD cards. I will try use AMDperfstudio or the nvidia nvperf for analyze the threads used and the calls. And i see they still dont know how to put on profit, the DP on shader computing. ( AMD perfstudio, not because AMD vs Nvidia, but it is yet the most accurate tools for analyse calls and threads on a sequence like that )
oups i see my first score is out of the top 10 now, will redo one for get back there. ( intitally was 4 ).
But visually, its surely the best benchmark we have seen this last year. Its a real little animation movie.
HonoredShadow
Maha Guru
Posts: 2372
Joined: 2007-05-27
Maha Guru
Posts: 2372
Joined: 2007-05-27
#4483670 Posted on: 12/20/2012 05:20 PM
How the hell did you get that score!
I only get 8400 and something. What is your GPU overclocked to? Are you using any SLI bits to get that working? (has anyone?)
My CPU is overclocked the same as yours and the CPU's are fairly similar but my score is lower than yours. Do you use Hyperthreading? What about HPET?
Please tell ALL!!! lol
Thanks.
How the hell did you get that score!
I only get 8400 and something. What is your GPU overclocked to? Are you using any SLI bits to get that working? (has anyone?)
My CPU is overclocked the same as yours and the CPU's are fairly similar but my score is lower than yours. Do you use Hyperthreading? What about HPET?
Please tell ALL!!! lol
Thanks.
The Laughing Ma
Maha Guru
Posts: 1927
Joined: 2008-04-12
Maha Guru
Posts: 1927
Joined: 2008-04-12
#4483710 Posted on: 12/20/2012 06:17 PM
The Vram is stock, but the GPU itself is factory OC'd it is a Gigabyte Windforce x 3 so I believe it comes with an OC'd shader of 1960mhz however compared to other GPus of the same 'type' I believe the Memory is actually a tad slower running at 6008Mhz.
I am sure the GPU has some overhead for a bit of user tweaking but just now I don;t really have any need for it.
Is your vram OCed?, what speed was your 670 running at?
The Vram is stock, but the GPU itself is factory OC'd it is a Gigabyte Windforce x 3 so I believe it comes with an OC'd shader of 1960mhz however compared to other GPus of the same 'type' I believe the Memory is actually a tad slower running at 6008Mhz.
I am sure the GPU has some overhead for a bit of user tweaking but just now I don;t really have any need for it.
SLI-756
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3142
Joined: 2012-07-10
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3142
Joined: 2012-07-10
#4483760 Posted on: 12/20/2012 07:28 PM
How the hell did you get that score!
I dunno, sata3 ssd as main drive, 2133 ram OCed to 2.4ghz, gpu bios flashed to allow power 150% (300w) + voltage 1.21v (it boosts to 1.3ghz now), hpet disabled, max pre-rendered frames in nvcp set at 1, i'm also generous with the amount of juice the cpu gets.
here's my result with a vram OC of +550
There's more discussion in the Catzilla thread in the benchmark section of forum, be prepared to meet a 680 lightning there that can do 1.34ghz without breaking a sweat though haha.
How the hell did you get that score!
I dunno, sata3 ssd as main drive, 2133 ram OCed to 2.4ghz, gpu bios flashed to allow power 150% (300w) + voltage 1.21v (it boosts to 1.3ghz now), hpet disabled, max pre-rendered frames in nvcp set at 1, i'm also generous with the amount of juice the cpu gets.
here's my result with a vram OC of +550
There's more discussion in the Catzilla thread in the benchmark section of forum, be prepared to meet a 680 lightning there that can do 1.34ghz without breaking a sweat though haha.
Phatzy
Master Guru
Posts: 541
Joined: 2007-04-13
Master Guru
Posts: 541
Joined: 2007-04-13
#4483789 Posted on: 12/20/2012 08:10 PM
a Modest Tiger 4850, running stock.
a Modest Tiger 4850, running stock.
fr33k
Maha Guru
Posts: 1784
Joined: 2004-01-15
Maha Guru
Posts: 1784
Joined: 2004-01-15
#4483841 Posted on: 12/20/2012 09:12 PM
7608 on tiger.
Best benchmark ever...
7608 on tiger.
Best benchmark ever...
The Phoenix
Maha Guru
Posts: 891
Joined: 2006-04-18
Maha Guru
Posts: 891
Joined: 2006-04-18
#4483964 Posted on: 12/20/2012 11:17 PM
Tiger Result: 8591
Tiger MainTest: 8588
Physics (CPU): 432
Fur (GPU): 657
Fluid (GPU): 668
Raymarch (GPU): 215
Loading time (ms): 14562
cool benchmark
Tiger Result: 8591
Tiger MainTest: 8588
Physics (CPU): 432
Fur (GPU): 657
Fluid (GPU): 668
Raymarch (GPU): 215
Loading time (ms): 14562
cool benchmark
scatman839
Ancient Guru
Posts: 8751
Joined: 2004-11-19
Ancient Guru
Posts: 8751
Joined: 2004-11-19
#4483977 Posted on: 12/20/2012 11:27 PM
Oh good, here was me thinking something was up with mines, the card being slower than advertised.
Seems to greatly prefer nvidia cards.
a Modest Tiger 4850, running stock.
Oh good, here was me thinking something was up with mines, the card being slower than advertised.
Seems to greatly prefer nvidia cards.
Phatzy
Master Guru
Posts: 541
Joined: 2007-04-13
Master Guru
Posts: 541
Joined: 2007-04-13
#4484026 Posted on: 12/21/2012 12:30 AM
I think its because of the use of physx.
I think its because of the use of physx.
ground_zero298
Master Guru
Posts: 463
Joined: 2009-09-11
Master Guru
Posts: 463
Joined: 2009-09-11
#4484125 Posted on: 12/21/2012 03:18 AM
2600k @ 4.6
Evga GTX 570 HD 2.5 960/2190
2600k @ 4.6
Evga GTX 570 HD 2.5 960/2190
sykozis
Ancient Guru
Posts: 13495
Joined: 2008-07-14
Ancient Guru
Posts: 13495
Joined: 2008-07-14
#4484131 Posted on: 12/21/2012 03:47 AM
Tiger Preset
HW = 6129
Physics = 657
Fur Test = 432
Fluid Test = 479
Raymarch = 168
Load Time = 8817
Total score = 6289
Tiger Preset
HW = 6129
Physics = 657
Fur Test = 432
Fluid Test = 479
Raymarch = 168
Load Time = 8817
Total score = 6289
cricket bones
Master Guru
Posts: 496
Joined: 2006-11-12
Master Guru
Posts: 496
Joined: 2006-11-12
#4484142 Posted on: 12/21/2012 04:23 AM
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: 2012-12-15
Looks like it uses Physx after all.