Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB NVMe SSD review
Corsair HS60 Headset review
Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VII HERO (Wifi) review
MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC review
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X review
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review
NZXT Kraken X72 Review
HP EX900 500GB M.2. SSD review
be quiet! Dark Rock PRO 4 review
Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D now with SBX Pro Studio




It seems Creative Labs is re-releasing the Sound Blaster Recon3D now with SBX Pro Studio. Interesting fact is, the card no longer carries the THX logo. previously these cards came with the THX TruStudio Pro software which of course needs a hefty licensing fee for THX. This has now been replaced by Creative's own SBX Pro Studio, in its newest Sound Baster Z series. Post-processing layers such as Crystalizer, Pro Surround, Pro Bass, Smart Volume, and Dialog Plus, are each re-branded with SBX ProStudio prefixes. The card is itself in terms of hardware is 100% similar to the previous model.
So by replacing THX TruStudio Pro the product is now labeled Sound Blaster Recon3D r2.
- Dolby Digital Live for compelling 5.1 surround sound from any source
- Dedicated high quality headphone amp; supports headphones and headsets with up to 600 ohms impedance
- Calibrate and customize every aspect of the Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIE audio and voice settings to really get into your game
- Connects to your home theatre system through a single digital cable and enjoy cinematic DVD movies by transforming any stereo or Dolby Digital 5.1 audio streams into high fidelity immersive surround sound
Features:
- 24-bit Analog-to-Digital conversion of analog inputs (up to 96 kHz sample rate)
- 24-bit Digital-to-Analog conversion of digital sources (up to 96 kHz sample rate to analog outputs)
- 16-bit to 24-bit recording sampling rates: 8,11.025,16, 22.05, 24, 32, 44.1, 48 and 96kHz
Connectivity
- Line In / Microphone In: Shared 1/8" mini jack
- Headphone: 1 x 1/8" mini jack
- Speaker Out: 3x 1/8" mini jacks
- Optical Out: TOSLINK
- Optical In: TOSLINK
Speaker Support
- Stereo/2.1 Speakers
- 5.1 Speakers
- Headphones
Bus Connection:
- PCI Express 1x
- Intel® Core™ 2 Duo or AMD® equivalent processor, 2.2 GHz or faster
- Intel, AMD® or 100% compatible motherboard
- Microsoft® Windows® 8, Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)
- 1GB RAM
- 600MB of free hard disk space
- Available PCI Express® (x1, x4 or x16) slot
- Available CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive
« Intel own Haswell motherboards in short supply · Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D now with SBX Pro Studio
· Transcend SSD740 Series Launches »
Creative Senz3D Interactive Gesture Camera - 06/04/2013 12:56 PM
Creative announced the new Creative Senz3D interactive gesture camera, introducing an immersive multi-dimensional gaming, video conferencing and voice control experience for PC enthusiasts and early a...
Creative T3150 Wireless Bluetooth 2.1 Speaker System - 03/29/2013 09:10 AM
Creative released a new Bluetooth 2.1 speaker system, the Creative T3150 Wireless. This 3-piece speaker system provides a working range up to 10 meters, comes with a wired remote control (power switch...
Creative Labs Inspire T3300 and T6300 Desktop Speakers - 10/18/2012 09:58 AM
Creative announced the Creative Inspire T3300 and the Creative Inspire T6300 speaker systems that are built for great audio performance.
Creative BlasterAxx Bluetooth Speakers - 05/31/2012 10:52 AM
Creative is about to release the BlasterAxx Bluetooth speaker series. The speaker series consists of three models -- SBX 20, SBX 10 and SBX 8. These speakers can be powered by a USB 2.0 connection to ...
AMD and Adobe Creative Suite 6 OpenCL and GPU Acceleration - 04/25/2012 10:46 AM
AMD announced a collaboration with Adobe Systems Incorporated to optimize a new set of GPU-accelerated features for Adobe products including the newly announced Adobe Photoshop CS6. Implementing GPU a...
harkinsteven
Senior Member
Posts: 2823
Joined: 2008-11-29
Senior Member
Posts: 2823
Joined: 2008-11-29
#4615014 Posted on: 06/10/2013 01:01 PM
I reckon just a software update, maybe firmware. Releasing a new version of these cards would be a step back. The Z series is much better and you can grab an oem version of the Z for quite cheap.
I reckon just a software update, maybe firmware. Releasing a new version of these cards would be a step back. The Z series is much better and you can grab an oem version of the Z for quite cheap.
Keitosha
Senior Member
Posts: 4742
Joined: 2004-11-16
Senior Member
Posts: 4742
Joined: 2004-11-16
#4615061 Posted on: 06/10/2013 02:16 PM
I reckon just a software update, maybe firmware. Releasing a new version of these cards would be a step back. The Z series is much better and you can grab an oem version of the Z for quite cheap.
My thoughts exactly! I've bought a Recon3D when it was first released. I went from regular X-Fi Titanium and returned the damn thing in hours. I could not stand the sound "quality" it was producing. Love the Z on the other hand.
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4615182 Posted on: 06/10/2013 05:02 PM
So is SBX Pro Studio the same as THX TruStudio Pro, or is it different?
I hated Creative's original CMSS-3D headphones surround sound virtualization - in my opinion, it wasn't any good for anything besides fairly accurate sound positioning in games; it 'killed' most of the sound in films and games, unlike Dolby's Headphones solution. However, when THX released their suite it was even better than Dolby's.
Naturally, I was quite happy to see Creative make the move to THX but have they now killed it, or is it just a rebrand? I feel it's a relevant question since SBX has replaced THX on high-end motherboards as well.
So is SBX Pro Studio the same as THX TruStudio Pro, or is it different?
I hated Creative's original CMSS-3D headphones surround sound virtualization - in my opinion, it wasn't any good for anything besides fairly accurate sound positioning in games; it 'killed' most of the sound in films and games, unlike Dolby's Headphones solution. However, when THX released their suite it was even better than Dolby's.
Naturally, I was quite happy to see Creative make the move to THX but have they now killed it, or is it just a rebrand? I feel it's a relevant question since SBX has replaced THX on high-end motherboards as well.
SHS
Senior Member
Posts: 367
Joined: 2001-05-02
Senior Member
Posts: 367
Joined: 2001-05-02
#4615333 Posted on: 06/10/2013 07:57 PM
SBX Pro Studio is the same as THX TruStudio Pro
The Z series is much better any way
As for you can grab an oem version of the Z but the retail has EMI Shield and doesn't cost much more.
SBX Pro Studio is the same as THX TruStudio Pro
The Z series is much better any way
As for you can grab an oem version of the Z but the retail has EMI Shield and doesn't cost much more.
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4615605 Posted on: 06/11/2013 12:18 AM
SBX Pro Studio is the same as THX TruStudio Pro
The Z series is much better any way
As for you can grab an oem version of the Z but the retail has EMI Shield and doesn't cost much more.
Thanks for answering. The Z-series support THX TruStudio Pro, correct?
SBX Pro Studio is the same as THX TruStudio Pro
The Z series is much better any way
As for you can grab an oem version of the Z but the retail has EMI Shield and doesn't cost much more.
Thanks for answering. The Z-series support THX TruStudio Pro, correct?
GenClaymore
Senior Member
Posts: 6061
Joined: 2004-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 6061
Joined: 2004-06-17
#4615613 Posted on: 06/11/2013 12:26 AM
Well from those who own both Z the the recon3d, told me that SBX and Tru studio pro was difference, as even i thought it was the same thing but labeled differently.
Well from those who own both Z the the recon3d, told me that SBX and Tru studio pro was difference, as even i thought it was the same thing but labeled differently.
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4618104 Posted on: 06/13/2013 11:04 PM
What does 'difference' mean exactly? Different bad or different good? Are you certain the DSP itself is different and it's not just a re-branding (SBX vs. THX)? It's all very confusing; I wish there was clarity on the matter.
Well from those who own both Z the the recon3d, told me that SBX and Tru studio pro was difference, as even i thought it was the same thing but labeled differently.
What does 'difference' mean exactly? Different bad or different good? Are you certain the DSP itself is different and it's not just a re-branding (SBX vs. THX)? It's all very confusing; I wish there was clarity on the matter.
sykozis
Member
Posts: 20391
Joined: 2008-07-14
Member
Posts: 20391
Joined: 2008-07-14
#4618130 Posted on: 06/13/2013 11:51 PM
DSP has nothing to do with software... DSP is the chip on the sound card that actually processes the audio data. Sound Blaster Z series cards and Recon3D cards are both based on the same SoundCore3D audio processor though....
What does 'difference' mean exactly? Different bad or different good? Are you certain the DSP itself is different and it's not just a re-branding (SBX vs. THX)? It's all very confusing; I wish there was clarity on the matter.
DSP has nothing to do with software... DSP is the chip on the sound card that actually processes the audio data. Sound Blaster Z series cards and Recon3D cards are both based on the same SoundCore3D audio processor though....
RavenMaster
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2009-08-19
Senior Member
Posts: 830
Joined: 2009-08-19
#4618152 Posted on: 06/14/2013 12:27 AM
It's just a software rebadge. The hardware is still a steaming pile of Mass Effect 3 ending.
The Z, ZX and ZXR absolutely kick the Recon's ass when it comes to sound quality. Don't waste ur money on the very low spec Recon. Go for one of the Z series.
It's just a software rebadge. The hardware is still a steaming pile of Mass Effect 3 ending.
The Z, ZX and ZXR absolutely kick the Recon's ass when it comes to sound quality. Don't waste ur money on the very low spec Recon. Go for one of the Z series.
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4618153 Posted on: 06/14/2013 12:27 AM
Thanks for the lecture on technology and not actually answering my question - very mature.
Digital Signal Processing is not a chip, it is the process of manipulating (accelerating) or essentially changing, in this case, audio signals. The Sound Core3D is a chip responsible for handling 'sound acceleration' by using DSP, which would otherwise be done on the CPU; its purpose is to offload CPU time.
Who said anything about software? Although, you could say DSP has a lot to do with software since, if it's supported (licensed) in software, and the CPU can handle the work (all modern CPUs can), you don't need a dedicated chip to do it. For example, all Asus Xonars do EAX on the CPU; also, PowerDVD and PureVideo HD both support Dolby Headphones without the need for specialized hardware, and so do virtually all laptops and desktop motherboards with THX TruStudio Pro and Dolby Home Theater v4.
Now, can you, please, answer my question? If you can that is...
DSP has nothing to do with software... DSP is the chip on the sound card that actually processes the audio data. Sound Blaster Z series cards and Recon3D cards are both based on the same SoundCore3D audio processor though....
Thanks for the lecture on technology and not actually answering my question - very mature.
Digital Signal Processing is not a chip, it is the process of manipulating (accelerating) or essentially changing, in this case, audio signals. The Sound Core3D is a chip responsible for handling 'sound acceleration' by using DSP, which would otherwise be done on the CPU; its purpose is to offload CPU time.
Who said anything about software? Although, you could say DSP has a lot to do with software since, if it's supported (licensed) in software, and the CPU can handle the work (all modern CPUs can), you don't need a dedicated chip to do it. For example, all Asus Xonars do EAX on the CPU; also, PowerDVD and PureVideo HD both support Dolby Headphones without the need for specialized hardware, and so do virtually all laptops and desktop motherboards with THX TruStudio Pro and Dolby Home Theater v4.
Now, can you, please, answer my question? If you can that is...
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4618167 Posted on: 06/14/2013 12:43 AM
It's just a software rebadge. The hardware is still a steaming pile of Mass Effect 3 ending.
The Z, ZX and ZXR absolutely kick the Recon's ass when it comes to sound quality. Don't waste ur money on the very low spec Recon. Go for one of the Z series.
Thank you for your answer. I am mostly interested in the SBX Pro Studio suite, and namely whether it's the same as THX TruStudio Pro. The reason for this is that most of the Z87 boards have it and I plan on buying one. Since I'd only use the DSP of the integrated audio solution and listen through a DAC/Amp box, I don't need to buy a separate sound card. Although, some of the high-end audio solutions on these boards seem pretty decent for headphone use. It'd be interesting to see how they fare.
P.S. I haven't played any of the Mass Effects (haven't had the time), but I can infer from your comment that 1 and 2's endings were great and 3's was crap. I see what you did there - nice.
It's just a software rebadge. The hardware is still a steaming pile of Mass Effect 3 ending.
The Z, ZX and ZXR absolutely kick the Recon's ass when it comes to sound quality. Don't waste ur money on the very low spec Recon. Go for one of the Z series.
Thank you for your answer. I am mostly interested in the SBX Pro Studio suite, and namely whether it's the same as THX TruStudio Pro. The reason for this is that most of the Z87 boards have it and I plan on buying one. Since I'd only use the DSP of the integrated audio solution and listen through a DAC/Amp box, I don't need to buy a separate sound card. Although, some of the high-end audio solutions on these boards seem pretty decent for headphone use. It'd be interesting to see how they fare.
P.S. I haven't played any of the Mass Effects (haven't had the time), but I can infer from your comment that 1 and 2's endings were great and 3's was crap. I see what you did there - nice.
sykozis
Member
Posts: 20391
Joined: 2008-07-14
Member
Posts: 20391
Joined: 2008-07-14
#4618239 Posted on: 06/14/2013 04:12 AM
Thanks for the lecture on technology and not actually answering my question - very mature.
Digital Signal Processing is not a chip, it is the process of manipulating (accelerating) or essentially changing, in this case, audio signals. The Sound Core3D is a chip responsible for handling 'sound acceleration' by using DSP, which would otherwise be done on the CPU; its purpose is to offload CPU time.
Who said anything about software? Although, you could say DSP has a lot to do with software since, if it's supported (licensed) in software, and the CPU can handle the work (all modern CPUs can), you don't need a dedicated chip to do it. For example, all Asus Xonars do EAX on the CPU; also, PowerDVD and PureVideo HD both support Dolby Headphones without the need for specialized hardware, and so do virtually all laptops and desktop motherboards with THX TruStudio Pro and Dolby Home Theater v4.
Now, can you, please, answer my question? If you can that is...
DSP is most commonly used as shorthand for digital signal processor, which is in fact a chip. SoundCore3D, is in fact a digital signal processor.
Now, since you're too lazy to do a 2sec google search and apparently didn't pay much (if any) attention to the article. THX TruStudio Pro is licensed by THX whereas the SBX ProStudio software isn't. That's the difference. If Creative doesn't pay for the THX license, then they can't provide software with the THX logo all over it. Removal of THX licensing, also allows Creative to provide a greater range of settings adjustability in their control panel if they choose to.
Thanks for the lecture on technology and not actually answering my question - very mature.
Digital Signal Processing is not a chip, it is the process of manipulating (accelerating) or essentially changing, in this case, audio signals. The Sound Core3D is a chip responsible for handling 'sound acceleration' by using DSP, which would otherwise be done on the CPU; its purpose is to offload CPU time.
Who said anything about software? Although, you could say DSP has a lot to do with software since, if it's supported (licensed) in software, and the CPU can handle the work (all modern CPUs can), you don't need a dedicated chip to do it. For example, all Asus Xonars do EAX on the CPU; also, PowerDVD and PureVideo HD both support Dolby Headphones without the need for specialized hardware, and so do virtually all laptops and desktop motherboards with THX TruStudio Pro and Dolby Home Theater v4.
Now, can you, please, answer my question? If you can that is...
DSP is most commonly used as shorthand for digital signal processor, which is in fact a chip. SoundCore3D, is in fact a digital signal processor.
Now, since you're too lazy to do a 2sec google search and apparently didn't pay much (if any) attention to the article. THX TruStudio Pro is licensed by THX whereas the SBX ProStudio software isn't. That's the difference. If Creative doesn't pay for the THX license, then they can't provide software with the THX logo all over it. Removal of THX licensing, also allows Creative to provide a greater range of settings adjustability in their control panel if they choose to.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 8778
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 8778
Joined: 2006-02-14
#4618271 Posted on: 06/14/2013 07:14 AM
As someone who has "Pro Studio" with my ZxR, let me tell you it's severely lacking. It barely has anything.
It has an entire tab for "Scout Mode" which is basically a terrible equalizer presetting. And 1 option under "Advanced" as well.
As someone who has "Pro Studio" with my ZxR, let me tell you it's severely lacking. It barely has anything.
It has an entire tab for "Scout Mode" which is basically a terrible equalizer presetting. And 1 option under "Advanced" as well.
pleshy
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2009-11-03
#4618445 Posted on: 06/14/2013 01:02 PM
DSP is most commonly used as shorthand for digital signal processor, which is in fact a chip. SoundCore3D, is in fact a digital signal processor.
Now, since you're too lazy to do a 2sec google search and apparently didn't pay much (if any) attention to the article. THX TruStudio Pro is licensed by THX whereas the SBX ProStudio software isn't. That's the difference. If Creative doesn't pay for the THX license, then they can't provide software with the THX logo all over it. Removal of THX licensing, also allows Creative to provide a greater range of settings adjustability in their control panel if they choose to.
That's the kind of answer I was hoping for, minus all the spite. Thanks.
I did read the article very carefully a few times; I also did way more than 2-seconds worth of google research and way before this article was released.
The thing is, I wasn't sure, and when I'm unsure - I ask. I'm not below asking for help, but, if you're going to answer, please, don't lecture me on whatever's in your head.
Digital signal microprocessors are usually found on 'boxes' aimed at guitarists to be used without a PC, and still, what they essentially do, is digital signal processing. It's pointless to argue which term is more often used, although most people would agree it's the process of changing audio signals and not the microprocessor which does it (the CPU in most cases - not a specialized DSP processor). Creative is the only company in the industry which still offers a dedicated processor for DSP, and it's been shown countless times in many reviews that it's not really necessary anymore as modern CPUs can more than adequately handle a little DSP on the side. This has been reflected in game development as well with the demise of EAX - practically the last AAA title to use EAX is the original Bioshock. Many modern games have great sound, or 'EAX 5.0 grade' sound, without the need for a specialized chip; Asus even showed that EAX itself can be done on the CPU as well.
As someone who has "Pro Studio" with my ZxR, let me tell you it's severely lacking. It barely has anything.
It has an entire tab for "Scout Mode" which is basically a terrible equalizer presetting. And 1 option under "Advanced" as well.
Thanks for the feedback, what I'm mostly interested in (actually the only thing) is the headphone surround sound virtualization in the THX suite. Do you happen to know whether that's any good? I tried it once, compared it to Dolby Headphones and it seemed better (wider soundstage, crisper sound, etc.), a few reviews back this up as well.
DSP is most commonly used as shorthand for digital signal processor, which is in fact a chip. SoundCore3D, is in fact a digital signal processor.
Now, since you're too lazy to do a 2sec google search and apparently didn't pay much (if any) attention to the article. THX TruStudio Pro is licensed by THX whereas the SBX ProStudio software isn't. That's the difference. If Creative doesn't pay for the THX license, then they can't provide software with the THX logo all over it. Removal of THX licensing, also allows Creative to provide a greater range of settings adjustability in their control panel if they choose to.
That's the kind of answer I was hoping for, minus all the spite. Thanks.
I did read the article very carefully a few times; I also did way more than 2-seconds worth of google research and way before this article was released.
The thing is, I wasn't sure, and when I'm unsure - I ask. I'm not below asking for help, but, if you're going to answer, please, don't lecture me on whatever's in your head.
Digital signal microprocessors are usually found on 'boxes' aimed at guitarists to be used without a PC, and still, what they essentially do, is digital signal processing. It's pointless to argue which term is more often used, although most people would agree it's the process of changing audio signals and not the microprocessor which does it (the CPU in most cases - not a specialized DSP processor). Creative is the only company in the industry which still offers a dedicated processor for DSP, and it's been shown countless times in many reviews that it's not really necessary anymore as modern CPUs can more than adequately handle a little DSP on the side. This has been reflected in game development as well with the demise of EAX - practically the last AAA title to use EAX is the original Bioshock. Many modern games have great sound, or 'EAX 5.0 grade' sound, without the need for a specialized chip; Asus even showed that EAX itself can be done on the CPU as well.
As someone who has "Pro Studio" with my ZxR, let me tell you it's severely lacking. It barely has anything.
It has an entire tab for "Scout Mode" which is basically a terrible equalizer presetting. And 1 option under "Advanced" as well.
Thanks for the feedback, what I'm mostly interested in (actually the only thing) is the headphone surround sound virtualization in the THX suite. Do you happen to know whether that's any good? I tried it once, compared it to Dolby Headphones and it seemed better (wider soundstage, crisper sound, etc.), a few reviews back this up as well.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4742
Joined: 2004-11-16
Does this means that it requires new hardware or will it also be a software update for existing models?