Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013

New Downloads
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1
AS SSD Benchmark Download v1.7.4739.38088
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.4 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: Noisiv Nvidia GeForce 320.14 BETA - Download and Discussionby: Sukovsky Change GTX 680 to 7970 DirectCU2?by: The_Fool Need Advice on Fuel Injectorsby: dellon132 ATI Catalyst 12.11 Beta 11 Modded driver For Legacy GPUby: k1net1cs [GUIDE] Fixing video playback & overclocking problems.by: Rob McClelland New PAX Creative Download section thread.by: BLEH! Hostile Superioirty-Complex Co-Workers - What to do?by: Pigchild Can't get past 4.4Ghz. Please review need advice.by: hallryu The Guru3D Screenshot Thread - RTFM! #22 (Rules update!)by: Stoja AMD Catalyst 13.5 beta 3 Mobility Driver


Online Users
There are currently 2696 user(s) online:
AbjectBlitz, Blackops_2, GenClaymore, Google, Jonik, Kuldebar, Mraz, MSN, Progeny, S3nt3nc3, Spankycz, S_IV, UZ7, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » News » AMD steps out of BAPCo consortium says SysMark is unreliable

AMD steps out of BAPCo consortium says SysMark is unreliable

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/22/2011 09:14 AM | 0 comment(s) ]

Guru3D.com ImageNews yesterday evening arrived that AMD decided to step out of the BAPCo consortium, responsible for the SYSmark suite. Bapco's test suite predominantly measures CPU performance, and with the new APU technology .. the graphics part and thus also parralel compute part is left out which obviously is a fair point. That GPU is a huge extra floating point co-processor in the APUs.

AMD advises customers to avoid SYSmark 12 benchmark results because the benchmark has little in common with real-world tests.

AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced that it will not endorse the SYSmark 2012 Benchmark (SM2012), which is published by BAPCo (Business Applications Performance Corporation). Along with the withdrawal of support, AMD has resigned from the BAPCo organization.

"Technology is evolving at an incredible pace, and customers need clear and reliable measurements to understand the expected performance and value of their systems," said Nigel Dessau, senior vice president and Chief Marketing Officer at AMD. "AMD does not believe SM2012 achieves this objective. Hence AMD cannot endorse or support SM2012 or remain part of the BAPCo consortium."

AMD will only endorse benchmarks based on real-world computing models and software applications, and which provide useful and relevant information. AMD believes benchmarks should be constructed to provide unbiased results and be transparent to customers making decisions based on those results. Currently, AMD is evaluating other benchmarking alternatives, including encouraging the creation of an industry consortium to establish an open benchmark to measure overall system performance.

AMD encourages anyone wanting more details about the construction and scoring methodology of the SM2012 benchmark to contact BAPCo. For more details on AMD's decision to exit BAPCo, please read AMD's Executive Blog authored by Nigel Dessau.






Rate this story
Rating:

« Intel 22nm Ivy Bridge further delayed to March 2012 · AMD steps out of BAPCo consortium says SysMark is unreliable · ZOTAC GeForce GTX 550 Ti Multiview Graphics Card »


Guru3D.com © 2013