NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti now rumored to be released at CES 2017




A new rumor surfaced on the product that will sit inbetween the GeForce GTX 1080 and Titan X (Pascal), the 1080 Ti surfaces again. Word right now is that the card will be released in the CES timeframe (1st week of January 2017).
The rumor originates from zol.com.cn who also claims a 1503 GPU frequency with a 1623 Boost freuqency. But they might have well taken the specs from charts like ours (we can calculate stff like TMUs/ memory bandwidth and GFLOPs based on specs)
The product has 52 shader clusters (SM) totalling towards 3328 shader processors and DDR5 memory. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti will be using the GP102 silicon, similar as used for Pascal TitanX, however it has 4 out of 30 shader processor clusters disabled, so that is 3,328 shader processors. If you do the math then your TMU count would get to 208 with a ROP count of 96. According to the screenshot the GPU itself will be clocked at 1503 MHz and 1623 MHz on the GPU Boost. Two things really jump out here, the memory remains GDDR5 not GDDR5X as Pascal Titan X is using and then the shader count has been decreased towards 3328 shader cores, which is still 768 more compared to the GeForce GTX 1080.
The numbers add up tyowards a 10.8 GFLOP/s single precision performing product. Charted up it looks like this:
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference GeForce | Titan X | GTX 1080 Ti | GTX 1080 | GTX 1070 | GTX 1060 |
| (2016 edition) | |||||
| GPU | GP102-400-A1 | GP102-200-A1 | GP104-400-A1 | GP104-200-A1 | GP106-400-A1 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal | Pascal |
| Transistor count | 12 Billion | 12 Billion | 7.2 Billion | 7.2 Billion | 4.4 Billion |
| Fabrication Node | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm | TSMC 16 nm |
| CUDA Cores | 3,584 | 3,328 | 2,560 | 1,920 | 1,280 |
| SMMs / SMXs | 28 | 26 | 20 | 15 | 10 |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 | 64 | 64 | 48 |
| GPU Clock Core | 1,417 MHz | 1,503 MHz | 1,607 MHz | 1,506 MHz | 1,506 MHz |
| GPU Boost clock | 1,531 MHz | 1,623 MHz | 1,733 MHz | 1,683 MHz | 1,709 MHz |
| Memory Clock | 2,500 MHz | 1,250 MHz | 1,250 MHz | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 12 GB | 8 GB | 8 GB | 3 GB / 6 GB |
| Memory Bus | 384-bit | 384-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 384 GB/s | 320 GB/s | 256 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| FP Performance | 11.0 TFLOPS | 10.0 TFLOPS | 9.0 TFLOPS | 6.45 TFLOPS | 4.61 TFLOPS |
| GPU Thermal Threshold | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C | 94 Degrees C |
| TDP | 250 Watts | 250 Watts | 180 Watts | 150 Watts | 120 Watts |
| Launch MSRP ref | $1200 | $899 (esti) | $599/$699 | $379/$449 | $249/$299 |
GDDR5 memory would bring in 384GB/s of memory bandwidth, which would be the deal-breaker over a Titan X with its 480GB/s of bandwidth. It is still more then the 1080 though. The card will get a 250 Watt TDP. Pricing wise we know nothing of course, but the 1080 is at 699 USD, the Titan X at 1200 USD .. so somewhere in the middle ?
We are not sure why the product qould launch at CES though, if DDR5 is used, productions should not be an issue and the Christmas season would make way more sense.
Rumor: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 2GB and 1050 Ti 4GB - 09/26/2016 08:13 AM
Over in the Asian countries there's quite a bit of speculation on the GeForce GTX 1050. Apparently there will be two models released, the regular 1050 with 2GB graphics memory yet also a 1050 Ti with...
Download Nvidia GeForce GameReady 372.90 WHQL driver - 09/21/2016 05:17 PM
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 372.90 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. NVIDIA released GeForce "Game Ready" drivers Version 372.90 WHQL for "Forza Horizon 3." Forza Ho...
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080Ti Specifications Surface - 09/15/2016 01:56 PM
Looks like the real deal to me, features and a specification list on the GeForce GTX 1080Ti just surfaced on the web. The card would get 12GB GDDR5 graphics memory and more shader cores compared to th...
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 to get 768 shader cores and 128-bit memory bus - 09/05/2016 07:38 AM
Within the line of expectation there is going to be a GeForce GTX 1050 released, positioned against the RX 460 from AMD. New specifications have surfaced on the web....
Download Nvidia GeForce 372.70 WHQL driver - 08/30/2016 05:07 PM
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 372.70 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA. This driver provides the optimal experience for World of Warcraft: Legion, Battlefield 1: Open Beta, Deus Ex: Mankind Di...
Master Guru
Posts: 567
Joined: 2001-08-12
Looking at this the normal 1050 will be exactly the same as the GTX 950, less shaders but it's clock speeds will make up for it but ultimately if you have a GTX 950 the 1050 is a worthless upgrade.
Ancient Guru
Posts: 7295
Joined: 2011-09-21
|
Looking at this the normal 1050 will be exactly the same as the GTX 950, less shaders but it's clock speeds will make up for it but ultimately if you have a GTX 950 the 1050 is a worthless upgrade.
|
This product is purely for OEM. Though I would like to see power figures.
Member Guru
Posts: 50
Joined: 2016-07-09
Not really. Yes, it would be stupid to get this if you already have a 950 or higher. But if you skipped that generation and have an older budget card this might be a good budget upgrade.
It's stupid to upgrade any card every generation.
Newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: 2014-12-22
You said "That would be faster then a Radeon RX 460 reports VideoCardz."
"Then?" I believe it would be faster THAN a Radeon RX 460."

Ancient Guru
Posts: 5638
Joined: 2008-07-31
|
so... The say nvidia revenue goes up 24% from a year ago after they release new cards 24% more expensive... intresting...
|
GTX 950 at launch, $159
GTX 1050 at launch, $119
GTX 1050 ti at launch, $139
So....24% more expensive means what to you?
Master Guru
Posts: 290
Joined: 2012-04-30
@chronek
lol, just because you sell something for 24% more, doesnt mean your revenue increases by the same amount.
2nd, a 1070 is now around 350, same like a 970. and even if its 400$, that would just mean an increase of 15%.
Maha Guru
Posts: 1226
Joined: 2007-05-31
Master Guru
Posts: 170
Joined: 2011-01-06
Won't somebody please think of madVR?!?

Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: 2016-09-19
|
...what
GTX 950 at launch, $159 GTX 1050 at launch, $119 GTX 1050 ti at launch, $139 So....24% more expensive means what to you? |
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: 2016-09-19
|
@chronek
lol, just because you sell something for 24% more, doesnt mean your revenue increases by the same amount. 2nd, a 1070 is now around 350, same like a 970. and even if its 400$, that would just mean an increase of 15%. |
Master Guru
Posts: 540
Joined: 2013-02-22
I think the only way Nvidia can increase revenues at this point is price increases since I doubt they can increase market share anymore since amd has stolen some back.
Maha Guru
Posts: 1226
Joined: 2007-05-31
|
I think the only way Nvidia can increase revenues at this point is price increases since I doubt they can increase market share anymore since amd has stolen some back.
|
AMD concentrate effort on middle segment (the one where you earn money btw), and where maxwell series is a hit (despite the small bus of the gtx960
) , NVidia is nearly nowhere on laptop segment and AMD on pro segment where the other color can be bought and are in stock lol... also don't forget that APU is still counted as GPU as intel IGP.at the end the real winner is still blue...
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5638
Joined: 2008-07-31
|
I said that about every card that nvidia released this year, why i should mention 1050 ti when even 1080 can barely play new games at 30 fps? And statistic said most buyed 1080, yes 1050 have good price, but still is a crap, and nvidia increase revenue saying that if you can not afford sli 1080 then buy 1050 ti
|
This thread that we are talking about is about the 1050/1050 Ti, of which you said were more expensive, of which obviously as shown and proven, are not
Are you saying you're going into each thread and purposefully spewing crap that has nothing to do with the thread topic? Good job being a troll
In regards to "revenue" and "increases in price" etc.
People don't realize: inflation
Hercules Graphics Card released in 1982 - $499 - with inflation $1245.45
Geforce 2 Ultra release price in 2000 - $500 - with inflation $699.34
Geforce 3 release price in 2001 - $500 - with inflation 680.38
GeForce 6800 Ultra Extreme release price in 2004 - $600 - with inflation $765.02
This list goes on and on, so yes, we have some "super" cards, aka the titans and the like, which SHOULDN'T be considered what use to be high end just becoming more expensive due to the nature of those cards (realistically, other then maybe the GTX 8800 Ultra, which today would have cost 962.98, there really hasn't been cards similar to the titans before), but other then those, we're still riding the same basic costs for cards, if not lower
|
Most buy this year was 1080, and in my country 1080 is 840$, when 980 i bought 670$, it is a bit more then 24% price increase (on most bought product), and nvidia announce 24% revenue increase, i just point that..
|
GTX 1080 is $599.99 for basic model
GTX 980 was $549.99 for basic model
If there's not a 50 dollar USD equivalent difference, that's your countries/retailers fault. Gotta love people who don't understand that.
Moderator
Posts: 12552
Joined: 2006-07-04
Single slot please.....
Also folks, let's keep it civil here.


Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: 2016-09-19
so... The say nvidia revenue goes up 24% from a year ago after they release new cards 24% more expensive... intresting...