Black Hole benchmark Download Version V4.1

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 01/23/2013 06:51 PM [ 123 comment(s) ]

Advertisement

Download the Black Hole benchmark (pre-release). It tests the pure calculation speed of your cpu in double and integer (floating and integer). The bench has 2 tests, multithreaded and singlethreaded. Multithreaded will take all your threads to its max use, singlethreaded stresses 1 thread 100% You can submit the final score to the database and I'll make scoretables of the scores I receive there.

Why Pre-release?

Website in make
Trying to make a code to measure the turbo clock of the cpu, not the base clock.
Looking for improvements

Usage

First Close ALL other programs.

Download the app from the download in this thread
Extract the exe
Run the exe and press multithreaded test (the program can be stuck while running, just let it do his job for 1-5 min)
When completed that, run the singlethreaded test (will last 1-4 min)
Then you get the final score, now you can save it in the database --> post your scores --> fill in your username and RIGHT CLOCKSPEED if overclocked. Be honest on this part!
Click send
Look on this thread for scores, I'll try to update every weekend

Other important information

Only for windows from xp and up
You need at least .NET framework 2.1
Only for 64 bit systems
Ram speed and latency can affect the score pretty much
At this moment it supports up to 34 threads, I'll update soon so you can test even systems with 128 threads!

Tagged as: Black Hole benchmark

Download Locations

Download Primary URL - 64-bit Edition [ 4416 downloads | Report broken link ]

Download Secondary URL - 64-bit Edition [ 495 downloads | Report broken link ]

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5

LeZaSh
Master Guru
Posts: 211
Joined: 2009-07-03

#4496786 Posted on: 01/09/2013 05:39 PM

tried installing .net framework 4.5....still no joy

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496826 Posted on: 01/09/2013 06:41 PM

Works fine here.

Just downloaded from first post, closed all programs and run. Nifty little thing.. I call it BHB now!

MM10X
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4051
Joined: 2008-08-21

#4496835 Posted on: 01/09/2013 06:54 PM

My little dual core I7 (3.3Ghz turbo) ...

I'm curious how this benchmark does in comparing processors with less cores to those with more.

BLEH!
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2979
Joined: 2010-10-17

#4496862 Posted on: 01/09/2013 07:18 PM

9024 total, 5574 multi, 3480 single. This is with RAM at 800 MHz though and stock core clocks.

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496864 Posted on: 01/09/2013 07:20 PM

YAY! Broke 10k! This is as far as my non-K 2600@4.45Ghz will go with RAM at 1696@9-9-9.

SLI-756
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3077
Joined: 2012-07-10

#4496885 Posted on: 01/09/2013 07:40 PM

DLD
Master Guru
Posts: 455
Joined: 2002-09-14

#4496908 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:01 PM

''stopoped responding...'' before even got started... Tried to run the .exe in a compatibility mode(s) - still no go..

Macnine is SandyB 2400, 2x2GB DDR3 1600MHz, win7 64bit, everything is up-to-date (regular official updates).

@smileman: "after I seen many results, I can see AMD is always in disadvantage in terms of the integer pass. I might try to look for fixes in the next version."

Please, don't look for fixes - AMD is itself an disadvantaged hardware. It is quite normal that Intel CPUs run this test much better than Advanced Marketing Deceivers' CPUs (like any other test out there)... :banana:

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496927 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:18 PM

@SLI-756. Damn these IVY's IPC.... Good score man.

To SmileMan and all others interested:

I tested the Benchmark at the same 4.45Ghz with RAM at 1131@4-6-4-16-T1 and 1413@7-7-6-16-T1.

The score was +/- the same as my previous one with RAM at 1696@9-9-9-16-T1.

SmileMan
Member Guru
Posts: 49
Joined: 2013-01-09

#4496930 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:21 PM

@SLI-756. Damn these IVY's IPC.... Good score man.

To SmileMan and all others interested:

I test the Benchmark at the same 4.45Ghz with RAM at 1131@4-6-4-16-T1 and 1413@7-7-6-16-T1.

The score was +/- the same as my previous one with RAM at 1696@9-9-9-16-T1.

latency affects the score more then the speed of the ram.

And for people who have overclocked cpu's plz fill in the RIGHT clockspeed in MHZ!
I receive an i5 2500k at stock that scores more then an i7 2600k @ 4.2ghz °-,-
Hate that, because I still didn't find out to measure turbo clock.... :'(

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496932 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:26 PM

latency affects the score more then the speed of the ram.

And for people who have overclocked cpu's plz fill in the RIGHT clockspeed in MHZ!
I receive an i5 2500k at stock that scores more then an i7 2600k @ 4.2ghz °-,-
Hate that, because I still didn't find out to measure turbo clock.... :'(

Smiley, if I may call you that just for now(it sounds good), you should better find a way to measure the real CPU Freq. because people WILL cheat and Ranks will be misleading and incorrect.
People cheat. Who doesn't want his 2500k to beat an overclocked 2600k?

I know my 2600 cannot beat the K CPU's.

SLI-756
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3077
Joined: 2012-07-10

#4496937 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:30 PM

@SLI-756. Damn these IVY's IPC.... Good score man..

Cheers, all i was interested in was beating yours but you know that already hehe, i need another cpu cooler -if i get my holiday pay tomorrow i'll see about getting one, gotta hit the magic 11k. (way outta your league, Koni)

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496945 Posted on: 01/09/2013 08:37 PM

I knew it. Tbh I had a feeling immediately as I saw your score below mine. I really did. lol!

Your specs are 1 step/class above mine. But I don't care. I will still finish the same benches as you, even with the fire department smacking me and pulling me out. :funny:

-Tj-
Maha Guru
Posts: 2388
Joined: 2012-05-18

#4496970 Posted on: 01/09/2013 09:08 PM

Here is mine at 3.64Ghz

Total score: 7827
multi: 4012
single: 3815

SLI-756
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3077
Joined: 2012-07-10

#4496976 Posted on: 01/09/2013 09:14 PM

Your RAM is tops my friend, and the only difference between our rigs is that they're different.
:oc:

SmileMan
Member Guru
Posts: 49
Joined: 2013-01-09

#4496984 Posted on: 01/09/2013 09:23 PM

Smiley, if I may call you that just for now(it sounds good), you should better find a way to measure the real CPU Freq. because people WILL cheat and Ranks will be misleading and incorrect.
People cheat. Who doesn't want his 2500k to beat an overclocked 2600k?

I know my 2600 cannot beat the K CPU's.

True, but that's the problem. The language I'm writing in doesn't support any code to measure the real clock speed. Only what's written in the registry...

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4496992 Posted on: 01/09/2013 09:35 PM

True, but that's the problem. The language I'm writing in doesn't support any code to measure the real clock speed. Only what's written in the registry...

I'm sure you will figure something out. You came so far.
E.g Like partly incorporating Cpu-z like software or running independently to measure the clock just before the benchmark begins or something? And saving it for submitting.

SmileMan
Member Guru
Posts: 49
Joined: 2013-01-09

#4497007 Posted on: 01/09/2013 09:49 PM

I'm sure you will figure something out. You came so far.
E.g Like partly incorporating Cpu-z like feature or running independently to measure the clock just before the benchmark begins or something? And saving it for submitting.

I thought the same. To just make that part in another language but would I be able to run them in 1 exe...?

Btw, the benchmark supports now up to 34 threads for the big systems

---TK---
Ancient Guru
Posts: 14674
Joined: 2005-12-10

#4497021 Posted on: 01/09/2013 10:11 PM

Get this on starting

Black hole v3 has stopped working
ditto

Koniakki
Master Guru
Posts: 670
Joined: 2009-09-15

#4497071 Posted on: 01/09/2013 11:17 PM

I thought the same. To just make that part in another language but would I be able to run them in 1 exe...?

One thing I know for sure. That this only translates to more hard work/research for you and AFAIK you are already very busy as I read.

Btw, the benchmark supports now up to 34 threads for the big systems

Well, lucky them.. The rest of the world is stuck at 4/8threads mostly..

Veeshush
Master Guru
Posts: 249
Joined: 2010-11-28

#4497224 Posted on: 01/10/2013 04:34 AM

Weird about that problem, check or your .NET framework is up to date...
The only person who fixed it, reinstalled windows, but that's not what I want you to do :S

Pretty sure everything is updated, Windows Update shows nothing (and I have gotten .net framework updates through it before so nothing is stopping it). I ran .NET Framework 4 Client Profile (Web Installer) and did a repair. I don't know if I need to run some sort of ".NET Framework 2 or 3" installer, or where I'd find those cause I just can't seem to find my way around microsoft.com.

If possible maybe you should have everyone send you some crash dumps.

mikeysg
Maha Guru
Posts: 1788
Joined: 2003-05-13

#4497226 Posted on: 01/10/2013 04:43 AM

Upped my CPU to 4.375ghz, and got this-

elkosith
Maha Guru
Posts: 891
Joined: 2008-01-11

#4497234 Posted on: 01/10/2013 05:40 AM

4552
1732 Multi
2820 Single
i5 2430M @2.4

Mannerheim
Ancient Guru
Posts: 4479
Joined: 2004-01-24

#4497250 Posted on: 01/10/2013 06:34 AM

I can get many different results. every run is different. 6200pt to~7000pt
integet and floating points from 30k to over 50k.

Stock and no others programs on screen.

Xtreme1979
Maha Guru
Posts: 1224
Joined: 2004-05-18

#4497259 Posted on: 01/10/2013 07:11 AM

HeavyHemi
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2008-10-27

#4497267 Posted on: 01/10/2013 07:48 AM

5 pages 1 2 3 4 5

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.