MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013
Medal of Honor Warfighter VGA Graphics performance




Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/25/2012 01:06 PM [ 44 comment(s) ]
In this review we'll look at Medal of Honor Warfighter VGA Graphics benchmark performance. The new and massively popular EA title is a great looking game. But how will it perform on a selection of different graphics cards ? This review will cover all these basics and a little more.
Read article
Advertisement
« ASUS GeForce GTX 660 Ti DirectCU II TOP review · Medal of Honor Warfighter VGA Graphics performance
· Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2012 »
pages 1 2
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:24 PM
Ah now that I read that back, I'll change that to something a little more decent.
Ah now that I read that back, I'll change that to something a little more decent.
The Postman
Maha Guru
Posts: 1459
Maha Guru
Posts: 1459
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:24 PM
Excellent review boss !!!
Excellent review boss !!!
ViperXtreme
Maha Guru
Posts: 2700
Maha Guru
Posts: 2700
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:25 PM
i dont mind that line tho XD
i dont mind that line tho XD
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:25 PM
I know I know ... but it's not a nice word to use.
i dont mind that line tho XD
I know I know ... but it's not a nice word to use.
davido6
Maha Guru
Posts: 1189
Maha Guru
Posts: 1189
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:26 PM
what it shows is if amd had 7990 out it smash that lot up poor nv
what it shows is if amd had 7990 out it smash that lot up poor nv

BLEH!
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2979
Ancient Guru
Posts: 2979
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:44 PM
Does 7970 trifire count?
what it shows is if amd had 7990 out it smash that lot up poor nv 

Does 7970 trifire count?

AndreasGuido
Maha Guru
Posts: 2229
Maha Guru
Posts: 2229
Posted on: 10/25/2012 03:59 PM
Nice one Hilbert
7950 gives same fps as 670 at 2560x1600..Those new drivers must have some magic in them 
Nice one Hilbert
7950 gives same fps as 670 at 2560x1600..Those new drivers must have some magic in them 
Loophole35
Maha Guru
Posts: 1595
Maha Guru
Posts: 1595
Posted on: 10/25/2012 04:16 PM
Good review I like how your calling the 7970Ghz edition the 7970 Boost I like that better AMD should buy that title off of you. This is about the same results I'm getting ATM with game and my 670 FTW I'm right at the 680 with the 58 FPS in 1080p great job boss.
Good review I like how your calling the 7970Ghz edition the 7970 Boost I like that better AMD should buy that title off of you. This is about the same results I'm getting ATM with game and my 670 FTW I'm right at the 680 with the 58 FPS in 1080p great job boss.
quimico
Newbie
Posts: 2
Newbie
Posts: 2
Posted on: 10/25/2012 04:44 PM
Good review, but I'm wondering why you have not included an Nvidia 580, the rest of the series are there but not this one

Good review, but I'm wondering why you have not included an Nvidia 580, the rest of the series are there but not this one

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Posted on: 10/25/2012 04:50 PM
No particular reason, at one point a man just runs out of time ...
23 cards are used my man.
There will also be questions as to why not try the Radeon 5000 series etc ... I have to stop at some point as these tests are extremely time consuming.
Good review, but I'm wondering why you have not included an Nvidia 580, the rest of the series are there but not this one


No particular reason, at one point a man just runs out of time ...
23 cards are used my man.
There will also be questions as to why not try the Radeon 5000 series etc ... I have to stop at some point as these tests are extremely time consuming.
Hyvry1
Maha Guru
Posts: 1450
Maha Guru
Posts: 1450
Posted on: 10/25/2012 04:55 PM
Great review, thanks!
I assume the ATI/AMD cards were not using the new 12.11 beta drivers?
Great review, thanks!
I assume the ATI/AMD cards were not using the new 12.11 beta drivers?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Administrator
Posts: 16923
Posted on: 10/25/2012 04:58 PM
Great review, thanks!
I assume the ATI/AMD cards were not using the new 12.11 beta drivers?
As in the conclusion is noted, Also mind you that the Radeon cards all have been tested with the Catalyst 12.11 Beta driver and the GeForce cards with the new 310.33 Beta driver."
Great review, thanks!
I assume the ATI/AMD cards were not using the new 12.11 beta drivers?
As in the conclusion is noted, Also mind you that the Radeon cards all have been tested with the Catalyst 12.11 Beta driver and the GeForce cards with the new 310.33 Beta driver."
Cryio
Newbie
Posts: 28
Newbie
Posts: 28
Posted on: 10/25/2012 05:04 PM
In the review it says "that the game is DX9 and DX10 compatible as well"
Wrong. Frostbyte 2 is build on DirectX10, hence the reason why it can only run on Vista and upward.
In the review it says "that the game is DX9 and DX10 compatible as well"
Wrong. Frostbyte 2 is build on DirectX10, hence the reason why it can only run on Vista and upward.
PhazeDelta1
Ancient Guru
Posts: 9311
Ancient Guru
Posts: 9311
Posted on: 10/25/2012 06:40 PM
In the review it says "that the game is DX9 and DX10 compatible as well"
Wrong. Frostbyte 2 is build on DirectX10, hence the reason why it can only run on Vista and upward.
Actually it's built on DX11.
In the review it says "that the game is DX9 and DX10 compatible as well"
Wrong. Frostbyte 2 is build on DirectX10, hence the reason why it can only run on Vista and upward.
Actually it's built on DX11.
Hyvry1
Maha Guru
Posts: 1450
Maha Guru
Posts: 1450
Posted on: 10/25/2012 06:57 PM
Doh. Missed that, was reading it on the phone at the time. Good to see the latest drivers in action. Thanks.
As in the conclusion is noted, Also mind you that the Radeon cards all have been tested with the Catalyst 12.11 Beta driver and the GeForce cards with the new 310.33 Beta driver."
Doh. Missed that, was reading it on the phone at the time. Good to see the latest drivers in action. Thanks.
KingK76
Newbie
Posts: 22
Newbie
Posts: 22
Posted on: 10/25/2012 08:15 PM
At the end of the article the reviewer states that even the GTX480 from "2008" does a decent job. Well the GTX480 was released in March of 2010. I have two running at 900MHz core 1800 Shader and 2200MHz vMEM and in SLI they still are running every game I play at 60fps. Thats with a i7 3770 @ 4.8GHz and 2400MHz DDR3 RAM. But anyway that card is not 4.5 years old... sheesh.
At the end of the article the reviewer states that even the GTX480 from "2008" does a decent job. Well the GTX480 was released in March of 2010. I have two running at 900MHz core 1800 Shader and 2200MHz vMEM and in SLI they still are running every game I play at 60fps. Thats with a i7 3770 @ 4.8GHz and 2400MHz DDR3 RAM. But anyway that card is not 4.5 years old... sheesh.
Undying
Maha Guru
Posts: 2660
Maha Guru
Posts: 2660
Posted on: 10/25/2012 08:44 PM
Indeed.
Strange is that HD 6000 series performance is so bad...
At the end of the article the reviewer states that even the GTX480 from "2008" does a decent job. Well the GTX480 was released in March of 2010. I have two running at 900MHz core 1800 Shader and 2200MHz vMEM and in SLI they still are running every game I play at 60fps. Thats with a i7 3770 @ 4.8GHz and 2400MHz DDR3 RAM. But anyway that card is not 4.5 years old... sheesh.
Indeed.
Strange is that HD 6000 series performance is so bad...
Rich_Guy
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6639
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6639
Posted on: 10/25/2012 09:08 PM
AMD have done a cracking job on these 12.11s
AMD have done a cracking job on these 12.11s

Elder III
Maha Guru
Posts: 1943
Maha Guru
Posts: 1943
Posted on: 10/25/2012 09:14 PM
Nice review Hilbert, thanks!
Nice review Hilbert, thanks!
gerardfraser
Maha Guru
Posts: 1113
Maha Guru
Posts: 1113
Posted on: 10/25/2012 09:43 PM
Nice review and now I want to buy this game and grab a pair of 7970 cards.
Nice review and now I want to buy this game and grab a pair of 7970 cards.
Loophole35
Maha Guru
Posts: 1595
Maha Guru
Posts: 1595
Posted on: 10/25/2012 09:44 PM
Strange is that HD 6000 series performance is so bad...
Must have gone Cysis2 with the tessellation.
Strange is that HD 6000 series performance is so bad...
Must have gone Cysis2 with the tessellation.
---TK---
Ancient Guru
Posts: 14680
Ancient Guru
Posts: 14680
Posted on: 10/25/2012 10:03 PM
looks like I can max the game at 1080p and have enough vram on my cards.
looks like I can max the game at 1080p and have enough vram on my cards.
dr.noob
Maha Guru
Posts: 1072
Maha Guru
Posts: 1072
Posted on: 10/25/2012 10:08 PM
Thanks, great as always.
Thanks, great as always.
Rich_Guy
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6639
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6639
Posted on: 10/25/2012 10:15 PM
Wonder if this'll beat the 690
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/HIS-Radeon-HD7970-X2-HD7990,18699.html
Wonder if this'll beat the 690
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/HIS-Radeon-HD7970-X2-HD7990,18699.html
pages 1 2
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Ancient Guru
Posts: 2979
"The 690 literally rapes everything in it's path"
Love this line. Looks like a fun game, too.