AMD A10-7800 Kaveri APU review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2014
ASUS ROG Swift PG278Q GSYNC Gaming Monitor review
Guru3D Contest 2014 - Win a Gigabyte GeForce GTX Titan Black WindForce
Gigabyte GeForce GTX Titan Black WindForce review
Nvidia Shield Tablet Preview
Corsair Flash Voyager GTX 128GB flash drive review
ASUS Essence STX II 7.1 Sound Card Review
Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Black review
PowerColor Devil 13 Dual GPU R9 290X Review
GeForce GTX Titan review
Posted by: on: 02/21/2013 03:54 PM [
183 comment(s) ]
We test and review the GeForce GTX Titan. The GeForce GTX Titan is NVIDIAs fastest single GPU based graphics card they have ever built. It is based on the GK110 GPU and has an astonishing 7.1 Billion transistors and is as such is nearly as fast as one GeForce GTX 690 with two GTX 680 GPUs ! We test the product with the hottest games like Battlefield 3, Sleeping Dogs, Far Cry 3, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Hitman Absolution and many more. Next to that with the three samples we have at hand we'll be looking at SLI performance scaling in another article as well.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
GeForce GTX Titan SLI review
pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »
orky87
Member Guru
Posts: 102
Member Guru
Posts: 102
Posted on: 02/21/2013 09:48 PM
what we are missing is 3-way OVERCLOCKED titans on multiple-monitor setups :/
why dont we have that, i see 3-way + multi, then i see OC, but separately.
What would be the point of that it's not like 3 Titans are not enough
what we are missing is 3-way OVERCLOCKED titans on multiple-monitor setups :/
why dont we have that, i see 3-way + multi, then i see OC, but separately.
What would be the point of that it's not like 3 Titans are not enough
bucknuts21
Newbie
Posts: 28
Newbie
Posts: 28
Posted on: 02/21/2013 09:49 PM
What a worthless overpriced piece of crap card this is and I'll tell you why. I can't F'ing afford it.
What a worthless overpriced piece of crap card this is and I'll tell you why. I can't F'ing afford it.
kache
Newbie
Posts: 32
Newbie
Posts: 32
Posted on: 02/21/2013 09:52 PM
I can't wait for Anandtech to review this:
With titan's overclocking depending in temperature, it should be possible to push the card pretty damn high with the liquid cooling maintaining the temperature under 50° permanently.
I can't wait for Anandtech to review this:
With titan's overclocking depending in temperature, it should be possible to push the card pretty damn high with the liquid cooling maintaining the temperature under 50° permanently.
alanm
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5463
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5463
Posted on: 02/21/2013 09:57 PM
No matter which way you look at it the card just can not be justified when there are cheaper alternatives out there.
If I knew that it could handle all future games at highest settings for next 5 years I would buy one. It would save me money as I tend to upgrade almost every year. Trouble is, that todays top cards are usually equalled or surpassed by much lower priced mid-range cards in 1 or 2 years. This incredible depreciation (in value and performance) is what makes it not worthy for me.
No matter which way you look at it the card just can not be justified when there are cheaper alternatives out there.
If I knew that it could handle all future games at highest settings for next 5 years I would buy one. It would save me money as I tend to upgrade almost every year. Trouble is, that todays top cards are usually equalled or surpassed by much lower priced mid-range cards in 1 or 2 years. This incredible depreciation (in value and performance) is what makes it not worthy for me.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
Posts: 20526
Administrator
Posts: 20526
Posted on: 02/21/2013 09:58 PM
I can't wait for Anandtech to review this:
With titan's overclocking depending in temperature, it should be possible to push the card pretty damn high with the liquid cooling maintaining the temperature under 50° permanently.
Until it reaches it's maximum 105% board power and starts downclocking.
I can't wait for Anandtech to review this:
With titan's overclocking depending in temperature, it should be possible to push the card pretty damn high with the liquid cooling maintaining the temperature under 50° permanently.
Until it reaches it's maximum 105% board power and starts downclocking.
-Tj-
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6958
Ancient Guru
Posts: 6958
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:06 PM
That 10K myth sure was funny
, its available from varius gpu manufacturers, far more then I've expected according to Rich_Guy's Aria info
Gainward, Auss, Gigabyte, Zotac, Asus..
But sorry the price is a joke, not worth it.
That 10K myth sure was funny
, its available from varius gpu manufacturers, far more then I've expected according to Rich_Guy's Aria info
Gainward, Auss, Gigabyte, Zotac, Asus..
But sorry the price is a joke, not worth it.
tsunami231
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3209
Ancient Guru
Posts: 3209
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:11 PM
I dont care for crysis series, I dont even like FPS games.
Crysis 3...
I dont care for crysis series, I dont even like FPS games.
hallryu
Posts: 11415
Posts: 11415
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:11 PM
Well it's around the £830 mark in the UK which is just mental. Glad I bought my second 7970 from BLEH! this week. Getting more performance for a little over half the price (second hand)
Still would lurve one though. Looks soooooo sexy. Have to hand it to Nvidia they produced a beautiful card.
Well it's around the £830 mark in the UK which is just mental. Glad I bought my second 7970 from BLEH! this week. Getting more performance for a little over half the price (second hand)
Still would lurve one though. Looks soooooo sexy. Have to hand it to Nvidia they produced a beautiful card.
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:16 PM
That is the .PLAN yes. Unfortunately Crysis 3 was unlocked today in my region, way too late for any reliable benchmarks.
So by tomorrow or over the weekend I'll try and see if I can start a Crysis 3 perf review for you guys. Right now I'm drinking a well deserved cold beer after DAYS of work on these articles -- while monitoring the servers are being crippled due to hefty load
Please do a CPU scaling in the artical as well I've seen one review that showed the fx8350 walking all over the sandy-bridge CPU's.
That is the .PLAN yes. Unfortunately Crysis 3 was unlocked today in my region, way too late for any reliable benchmarks.
So by tomorrow or over the weekend I'll try and see if I can start a Crysis 3 perf review for you guys. Right now I'm drinking a well deserved cold beer after DAYS of work on these articles -- while monitoring the servers are being crippled due to hefty load
Please do a CPU scaling in the artical as well I've seen one review that showed the fx8350 walking all over the sandy-bridge CPU's.
kache
Newbie
Posts: 32
Newbie
Posts: 32
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:21 PM
No news on whether that "feature" can be disabled?
Until it reaches it's maximum 105% board power and starts downclocking.
No news on whether that "feature" can be disabled?
kache
Newbie
Posts: 32
Newbie
Posts: 32
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:23 PM
Then what are you doing here? If you are a retrogamer there should be no reason for you to read reviews of new enthusiast cards...
I dont care for crysis series, I dont even like FPS games.
Then what are you doing here? If you are a retrogamer there should be no reason for you to read reviews of new enthusiast cards...
Texter
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:28 PM
Oh gimmeabreak...
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/ this?
The only walking I see is that PII X4 965 at 3.4 GHz stomping all over the FX4300 at 3.8 GHz.
Please do a CPU scaling in the artical as well I've seen one review that showed the fx8350 walking all over the sandy-bridge CPU's.
Oh gimmeabreak...
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/ this?
The only walking I see is that PII X4 965 at 3.4 GHz stomping all over the FX4300 at 3.8 GHz.
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Posted on: 02/21/2013 10:42 PM
Oh gimmeabreak...
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/ this?
The only walking I see is that PII X4 965 at 3.4 GHz stomping all over the FX4300 at 3.8 GHz.
The fx8350 at stock has 10 fps on the 2500k stock thats 10 frames thats not walking all over a sandy bridge I don't know what is the only stock processor beating the $200 FX in that test is a $1000 CPU okay
BTW the 8350 ($200) beat the 3770k ($340) by 2fps both min and max the 965 be beat the 4300 by 1 fps in max only you sir are doing it wrong.
Oh gimmeabreak...
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/ this?
The only walking I see is that PII X4 965 at 3.4 GHz stomping all over the FX4300 at 3.8 GHz.
The fx8350 at stock has 10 fps on the 2500k stock thats 10 frames thats not walking all over a sandy bridge I don't know what is the only stock processor beating the $200 FX in that test is a $1000 CPU okay
BTW the 8350 ($200) beat the 3770k ($340) by 2fps both min and max the 965 be beat the 4300 by 1 fps in max only you sir are doing it wrong.
Texter
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:09 PM
You're being delusional. Crysis 3 likes threads, a quad without HT will give it 4, an octocore will give it 8. Then it likes clocks. What I see is a QUAD 2500K at 3.3 close to already a HEXACORE 1100T at 3.3 and a HEXACORE FX6300. Don't tell me you don't know what happens next.
only you sir are doing it wrong.
You're being delusional. Crysis 3 likes threads, a quad without HT will give it 4, an octocore will give it 8. Then it likes clocks. What I see is a QUAD 2500K at 3.3 close to already a HEXACORE 1100T at 3.3 and a HEXACORE FX6300. Don't tell me you don't know what happens next.
millibyte
Master Guru
Posts: 460
Master Guru
Posts: 460
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:09 PM
Someone who doesn't like fps games = retrogamer...mmmmkay
I've read a lot of stupid s*** today but this takes the cake. Good job.
Then what are you doing here? If you are a retrogamer there should be no reason for you to read reviews of new enthusiast cards...
Someone who doesn't like fps games = retrogamer...mmmmkay
I've read a lot of stupid s*** today but this takes the cake. Good job.
Loophole35
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5162
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:14 PM
First off the 8350 (8 threads 4.2Ghz boost) beat the 3770k(8 threads 3.9Ghz boost) by 2fps in min and max you said that only 1fps on max is destroying it so by your definition the 8350(8 threads) destroys the 3770k(8 threads) 3 times over.
You're being delusional. Crysis 3 likes threads, a quad without HT will give it 4, an octocore will give it 8. Then it likes clocks. What I see is a QUAD 2500K at 3.3 close to already a HEXACORE 1100T at 3.3 and a HEXACORE FX6300. Don't tell me you don't know what happens next.
First off the 8350 (8 threads 4.2Ghz boost) beat the 3770k(8 threads 3.9Ghz boost) by 2fps in min and max you said that only 1fps on max is destroying it so by your definition the 8350(8 threads) destroys the 3770k(8 threads) 3 times over.
---TK---
Ancient Guru
Posts: 17902
Ancient Guru
Posts: 17902
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:26 PM
what an awful card, maybe I`ll get one to run as a physics card. lol
what an awful card, maybe I`ll get one to run as a physics card. lol
Weecka
Master Guru
Posts: 267
Master Guru
Posts: 267
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:35 PM
Good performance, but for the price they want there are way better (and cheaper ) alternatives. I'm an nvidia guy myself since TNT 2, but at this point i would be looking at AMD, as their price/performance is way better. But for now of course, my 680 is more than enough for gaming @1080p.
Good performance, but for the price they want there are way better (and cheaper ) alternatives. I'm an nvidia guy myself since TNT 2, but at this point i would be looking at AMD, as their price/performance is way better. But for now of course, my 680 is more than enough for gaming @1080p.
MadGizmo
Maha Guru
Posts: 1314
Maha Guru
Posts: 1314
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:37 PM
Great article. That's one hell of a card.
Great article. That's one hell of a card.
---TK---
Ancient Guru
Posts: 17902
Ancient Guru
Posts: 17902
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:39 PM
And this is why I recommend the 7850:
at 2560 how many fps would you expect to get?
I dont think anybody is going to care about the performance per dollar if your slide show gaming?
And this is why I recommend the 7850:
at 2560 how many fps would you expect to get?
I dont think anybody is going to care about the performance per dollar if your slide show gaming?
Texter
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Maha Guru
Posts: 2275
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:46 PM
To my knowledge, turbo modes won't kick in when all the cores are actually being used, so the listed clocks are just that. The 8350 isn't walking all over IB and SB, it's simply tagging along while it can. The 2500K is already as fast as a hexacore FX at stock, so it won't surprise me if it overtakes the 8350 at 4.5GHz, not to mention all the HT models with a mild OC compared to a maxed out FX. Any price advantage it has over the Intels will evaporate in a year's time due to the 8350's power draw, especially when you're running it on all cores. It's a GOOD thing that a game like Crysis 3 lets at least FX 8320/-50 shine, so hopefully FX owners get to see that more often, but that doesn't make FX a sensation to behold.
First off the 8350 (8 threads 4.2Ghz boost) beat the 3770k(8 threads 3.9Ghz boost)
To my knowledge, turbo modes won't kick in when all the cores are actually being used, so the listed clocks are just that. The 8350 isn't walking all over IB and SB, it's simply tagging along while it can. The 2500K is already as fast as a hexacore FX at stock, so it won't surprise me if it overtakes the 8350 at 4.5GHz, not to mention all the HT models with a mild OC compared to a maxed out FX. Any price advantage it has over the Intels will evaporate in a year's time due to the 8350's power draw, especially when you're running it on all cores. It's a GOOD thing that a game like Crysis 3 lets at least FX 8320/-50 shine, so hopefully FX owners get to see that more often, but that doesn't make FX a sensation to behold.
Lane
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5393
Ancient Guru
Posts: 5393
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:54 PM
Just for be fair, Toms have precise it seems this is a problem with the driver used ( now its unclear if touch the crash they have got with it or performance wise ..) On anandtech who have not use OpenCL, the Titan is not doing so bad ( still it loose incredibly in the C++ AMP benchmark and directcompute bench ( DX ) .. let say, for now it is a mixed bag.
I dont expect to see OpenCL benchmark have good results on Nvidia cards, they basically dont optimise anything outside CUDA. ( This is starting to be a real error, as computing side, the comparaison start to be really not good for Nvidia when most and most professional compare the result obtained on specifc calculation with CUDA and OpenCL and start find better result with OpenCL ( first the same "results" using CUDA and OpenCL on Nvidia and it is even worse when they use AMD OpenCL vs Nvidia OpenCL vs Cuda).
Toms did some. The 7970 hammers it in most of 'em due to OpenCL support
Just for be fair, Toms have precise it seems this is a problem with the driver used ( now its unclear if touch the crash they have got with it or performance wise ..) On anandtech who have not use OpenCL, the Titan is not doing so bad ( still it loose incredibly in the C++ AMP benchmark and directcompute bench ( DX ) .. let say, for now it is a mixed bag.
I dont expect to see OpenCL benchmark have good results on Nvidia cards, they basically dont optimise anything outside CUDA. ( This is starting to be a real error, as computing side, the comparaison start to be really not good for Nvidia when most and most professional compare the result obtained on specifc calculation with CUDA and OpenCL and start find better result with OpenCL ( first the same "results" using CUDA and OpenCL on Nvidia and it is even worse when they use AMD OpenCL vs Nvidia OpenCL vs Cuda).
Ji1986
Maha Guru
Posts: 855
Maha Guru
Posts: 855
Posted on: 02/21/2013 11:54 PM
Well its safe to say the card it self is a beast and performs well.
However for that price tag I thought It would perform much better. I was waiting for the reviews to see whether I get rid of my 2 x gtx 670 for the titan.
but after seeing the review I wont be.....
Well its safe to say the card it self is a beast and performs well.
However for that price tag I thought It would perform much better. I was waiting for the reviews to see whether I get rid of my 2 x gtx 670 for the titan.
but after seeing the review I wont be.....
Gripen90
Master Guru
Posts: 784
Master Guru
Posts: 784
Posted on: 02/22/2013 12:01 AM
I won't be replacing 3x GTX 670 for a Titan either...
I won't be replacing 3x GTX 670 for a Titan either...
pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Newbie
Posts: 32
And this is why I recommend the 7850:
It's irrelevant. Titan it's a pure enthusiast card, so price is not much of an issue for people who want the highest possible performance.