Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 WindForce 3x OC review
GeForce GTX 780 SLI and Multi monitor review
GeForce GTX 780 review
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review

New Downloads
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
PhysX System Software 9.13.0325 Download
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0


New Forum Topics
by: Stone Gargoyle Techland Announce Dying Light (PS3/360/PC/PS4/XBOXONE)by: Stone Gargoyle Need for Speed Rivalsby: Pill Monster Ford Australia to shut down factoriesby: Hilbert Hagedoorn GeForce GTX 780 reviewby: RedSeptember Call of Juarez - Gunslingerby: Jonnyboy Artifacts with BF3by: Herbert0100 Hey guys a few questions about the 780 and upgrading!by: Frances Butterfly Labsby: Noisiv Nvidia GeForce 320.14 BETA - Download and Discussionby: stasio Nvidia GeForce 320.18 WHQL Download and Discussion


Online Users
There are currently 2694 user(s) online:
Apatch, chanw4, Google, IchimA, Live Search, MSN, pbvider, PowerK, Veeshush, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review » Page 2

Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 12/22/2011 02:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Test Environment & Equipment
Tweet


Test Environment & Equipment

Here is where we begin the benchmark portion of this article, but first let me show you our test system plus the software we used.

Mainboard

AMD880FX/990FX/X58/Z68/X79/P55

Processors

  • Athlon II X4 645
  • Phenom X4 970
  • AMD FX 8150
  • Core i5 661
  • Core i7 870
  • Core i7 965 **
  • Core i7 3960X
  • Core i7 2600K
  • Core i7 2600K @ 5 GHz

** This processor runs slightly overclocked  at 3.75 GHz as it is our standard processor we use in our graphics test platforms.

Graphics Card

Radeon HD 7970

Memory

2x4096MB or 3x 2048 MBDDR3 Corsair @ 1333MHz

Power Supply Unit

1200 Watt

Monitor

Dell 3007WFP - up to 2560x1600

OS related software

Windows 7 RTM 64-bit
DirectX 9/10/11 End User Runtime (latest available)
AMD Catalyst AMD_Radeon_HD_7900_Win7_64 beta (11.12)
NVIDIA GeForce series latest WHQL 285.62 WHQL

Software benchmark suite

  • Battlefield 3
  • Far Cry 2
  • Crysis 2
  • Anno 1404
  • 3DMark Vantage
  • 3DMark 11
  • Metro 2033
  • Alien vs Predator

A word about 'FPS'

What are we looking for in gaming, performance wise? First off, obviously Guru3D tends to think that all games should be played at the best image quality (IQ) possible. There's a dilemma though, IQ often interferes with the performance of a graphics card. We measure this in FPS, the number of frames a graphics card can render per second, the higher it is the more fluently your game will display itself.

A game's frames per second (FPS) is a measured average of a series of tests. That test is often a time demo, a recorded part of the game which is a 1:1 representation of the actual game and its gameplay experience. After forcing the same image quality settings; this time-demo is then used for all graphics cards so that the actual measuring is as objective as can be.

Frames per second

Gameplay

<30 FPS

very limited gameplay

30-40 FPS

average yet very playable

40-60 FPS

good gameplay

>60 FPS

best possible gameplay

  • So if a graphics card barely manages less than 30 FPS, then the game is not very playable, we want to avoid that at all cost.
  • With 30 FPS up-to roughly 40 FPS you'll be very able to play the game with perhaps a tiny stutter at certain graphically intensive parts. Overall a very enjoyable experience. Match the best possible resolution to this result and you'll have the best possible rendering quality versus resolution, hey you want both of them to be as high as possible.
  • When a graphics card is doing 60 FPS on average or higher then you can rest assured that the game will likely play extremely smoothly at every point in the game, turn on every possible in-game IQ setting.
  • Over 100 FPS? You either have a MONSTER graphics card or a very old game.

Monitor Setup

Before playing games, setting up your monitor's contrast & brightness levels is a very important thing to do. I realized recently that a lot of you guys have set up your monitor improperly. How do we know this? Because we receive a couple of emails every now and then telling us that a reader can't distinguish between the benchmark charts (colors) in our reviews. We realized, if that happens, your monitor is not properly set up.

This simple test pattern is evenly spaced from 0 to 255 brightness levels, with no profile embedded. If your monitor is correctly set up, you should be able to distinguish each step, and each step should be visually distinct from its neighbors by the same amount. Also, the dark-end step differences should be about the same as the light-end step differences. Finally, the first step should be completely black.





10 pages 1 2 3 4 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review » Page 2

Related Articles
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
We test and review the MSI Radeon HD 7790 OC edition, also known under SKU code R7790-1GD5-OC incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming.

Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC review
We test and review the Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC edition, also known under SKU code GV-R7790OC-2GD. We benchmark the product incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming. The Gigabyte HD7790 OC 2GB clocks in at 1075 MHz on the boost engine, packed with totally silent custom cooling.

Radeon HD 7990 review
We review the new AMD Radeon HD 7990 including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it doing it in style, two fully equipped Tahiti XT2 GPUs versus good yet silent cooling. In this review we'll look at the product, the architecture, the benchmarks, including frametime based FCAT measurements. Head on over towards our AMD Radeon HD 7990.

Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker review
We test and review the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker, this is the much discussed 7870 card that in fact has a 7900 series GPU, the Tahiti LE. For a fair amount of money this series 7800 product now offers 7900 series performance. Armed with 2GB of graphics memory it hits a sweet spot gaming performance wise and to date it one of the more popular products in the mainstream segment. Let's check out the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013