Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review

New Downloads
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
PhysX System Software 9.13.0325 Download
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1


New Forum Topics
by: dellon132 ATI Catalyst 12.11 Beta 11 Modded driver For Legacy GPUby: CPC_RedDawn Fine tuning my GPU overclock.by: Stone Gargoyle Xbox World reveals Next Gen Xbox?by: Hilbert Hagedoorn NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780, GTX 770 and GTX 760 Tiby: Stone Gargoyle FIFA 14 PC won't use new Ignite engineby: dekka nvidia drivers 320.22 whqlby: Pigchild Can't get past 4.4Ghz. Please review need advice.by: Hilbert Hagedoorn Fractal Design Node 304 gets all whiteby: Hilbert Hagedoorn Microsoft Xbox One console shownby: Hilbert Hagedoorn RadeonPro BETA (Automating 3D Settings) #2


Online Users
There are currently 3059 user(s) online:
ablev, ACMPraetorian, BahamutxD, BLEH!, DesGaizu, Dillinger, dsbig, Google, kens30, Lane, leopr, Li4m79, Live Search, Memorian, MSN, scipio, Starfighter2, winny, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review » Page 10

Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 12/22/2011 02:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Final Words & Conclusion
Tweet

 

Final Words & Conclusion

And that's it for this CPU scaling overview. The article was a quickie in the sense that I simply was curious what the effect of processors anno 2012 with a single GPU high-end graphics card would be like.

The long story short is simple, any modern age quad-core processor will do just fine with the Radeon HD 7970. You will start seeing CPU limitation mostly in the lower resolutions up-to 1600x1200, but considering that everybody is playing at 1920x1080/1200 these days the reality remains that you really do not need a 1000 USD processor.

I want to make not of the fact that our results are all based on single player game test, in a massive online fragfest with many multiple players a faster processor or more threaded processor always comes in handy.

Radeon HD 7970

On AMD's side the Phenom II series still make a lot of sense for the money really. On Intel's side the Core i7 2600K remains my personal favorite. We didn't have one in the lab, but a Core i5 2500K would be a cheaper and only slightly lesser alternative.

If you stick to just one GPU really, the faster Phenom II processor and the AMD FX 8150 will be sufficient however you can expect slightly slower framerates until you hit the higher monitor resolutions. The latest Intel processor will give you a lot more underlying performance, and that's going to help you our in minimum frame rates as well. We do have to mention clearly that we measure in average framerates, so in the lower framerate spectrum a slower CPU can make a difference.

If in the future you decide to go Crossfire with two 7970 cards that's where processor dependency will kick in way more importantly, really the only logical choice then will be the Sandy Bridge and Sandy Bridge-E processors as we expect that's where CPU limitation will start becoming an issue. We will be working on a Crossfire review soon, so you better watch out for the results on that one.

If anything, this little article proofs once again that investing money in a faster graphics card will gain you better game performance compared to investing in a faster CPU. The performance difference in-between a 1000 USD Core i7 3960X compared to a 320 USD Core i7 2600K processor is extremely small, something you'd never notice unless measured. So we say, stick to a modern mainstream quad-core processor and the differences really aren't that big in the overall framerate, especially at 1920x1080/1200. Yes we know it's that weird penumbra, the higher you go in resolutions, the slower your processor may be. Remember, once you pass 1920x1080/1200 the GPU is almost always the bottleneck, not your processor.

But if you want a little extra CPU cycle reserve in that trunk, yeah .. Sandy Bridge processors are the shiznit really. Remember this article applies to a Single-GPU Radeon HD 7970 based PC, with multiple GPUs the dynamic and requriements change real fast.

But wait there's more content ... check out our Radeon HD 7970 reference review article right here as well as a new R7970 overclock guide right here.

Have a great weekend you guys and a great Christmas 2011 !

  • Leave/read comments on this product
  • Sign up to receive a notice when we publish a new article
  • Or go back to Guru3D's front page




10 pages « < 7 8 9 10


Guru3D.com » Articles » Radeon HD 7970 CPU scaling performance review » Page 10

Related Articles
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
We test and review the MSI Radeon HD 7790 OC edition, also known under SKU code R7790-1GD5-OC incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming.

Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC review
We test and review the Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC edition, also known under SKU code GV-R7790OC-2GD. We benchmark the product incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming. The Gigabyte HD7790 OC 2GB clocks in at 1075 MHz on the boost engine, packed with totally silent custom cooling.

Radeon HD 7990 review
We review the new AMD Radeon HD 7990 including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it doing it in style, two fully equipped Tahiti XT2 GPUs versus good yet silent cooling. In this review we'll look at the product, the architecture, the benchmarks, including frametime based FCAT measurements. Head on over towards our AMD Radeon HD 7990.

Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker review
We test and review the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker, this is the much discussed 7870 card that in fact has a 7900 series GPU, the Tahiti LE. For a fair amount of money this series 7800 product now offers 7900 series performance. Armed with 2GB of graphics memory it hits a sweet spot gaming performance wise and to date it one of the more popular products in the mainstream segment. Let's check out the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013