Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS Maximus VI Extreme Z87 motherboard review
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review
Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 review
Corsair Vengeance K70 review
MSI GeForce GTX 770 Lightning review
EVGA GeForce GTX 770 SC review
Plextor M5M 256GB mSATA SSD review
AMD A10 6800K review
SanDisk Extreme II 120 - 240 and 480 GB SSD review
ASUS Sabertooth Z87 motherboard review

New Downloads
Media Player Classic Home Cinema v1.6.8 Download
Sandra 2013 SP4 19.50 download
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
AMD Catalyst 13.6 BETA 2 Download
CPU-Z 1.6.4
AIDA64 Download version 3.00
AMD Catalyst 13.6 BETA Download
PrecisionX Download Version 4.2.0
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: Stone Gargoyle Xbox World reveals Next Gen Xbox?by: incneet Bench 3Dmark11 GTX460 | 320.18|320.17|306.97|311.70|314.22|320.27by: WhiteLightning PSN+ Monthly Games for PS3 and Vita EUby: asder00 AMD Catalyst 13.x (13.150.0.0 May 23)by: asder00 AMD Catalyst 13.6 BETA2 (13.101.0.0 June 4)by: Brasky XBOX One Policy Reversalby: WhiteLightning Sony to Unveil PS3 Successor !!!by: rflair James Gandolfini 'Tony Soprano' dead at 51by: stasio Nvidia GeForce 320.18 WHQL Download and Discussionby: shoja Codemasters GRID 2(?!)


Online Users
There are currently 1975 user(s) online:
CCoR-, elpsychodiablo, Google, incneet, Live Search, Memorian, MSN, PuddingWagon, scoter man1, UnrealGaming, Watcher, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon HD 6850 & 6870 CrossfireX review » Page 15

Radeon HD 6850 & 6870 CrossfireX review - Final Words & Conclusion

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/21/2010 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Tweet

 

Final Words & Conclusion

We've been dealing with CrossfireX reviews ever since the beginning and surely a lot has changed over the years. The one recommendation we always gave you guys is to keep it simple at 2 GPUs maximum, as after 2 GPUs in a CrossfireX setup you quickly run into weird anomalies that can be irritating. AMD limited the 6800 towards 2-way Multi-GPU gaming as such was a very peasant experience. Most if not all games scaled just really well and the games that are a little GPU bound can scale at 1.9x ... which is very impressive to see.

So over the years Multi-GPU support has improved quite a bit, AMD still isn't up-to snuff at the level of NVIDIA though, multi-GPU supports still literally and directly remains the Achilles heel of ATI's Catalyst drivers. For years now we have been requesting user-based multi-GPU profiles. See when a new game comes out, multi-GPU support will not be supported by the Catalyst driver. ATI will always need to update this through drivers or downloadable profiles. What ATI needs to do is to allow the end user to make custom profiles per game. A small tip, renaming your game-executable towards a game title that is supported can, not always but often, help out.

Now we also do have warn you about the fact that multiple GPUs make more noise and heat inside your PC, so make sure you have some good ventilation inside your PC. Noise wise the R6870 was by far the best, you can expect plain silly old normal noise levels. The R6850 setup was more noisy but remained acceptable and not irritating, but it was borderline though.

Performance wise we see really good numbers, with two 6870 cards you'll see 27.800 points in 3DMark Vantage ( GPU P-score) and 23K5 points for the 6850 setup with two cards. That's sincerely high performance for cards in this price-range anno 2010. Relating that to games then, Dirt in DX11 scored 112 FPS at 19x12 8xaa/16xAF on the R6850 and 124 FPS for the R6870. Considering 60 FPS is all you need you would be future proof for a while alright.

Battlefield Bad Company 2 scores 89 FPS (6870) at 1920x1200 and 8xAA, that's just brilliant as that is a HUGE framerate with 1.9x performance increases. Fact is, you'll beat any single-GPU solution to date in terms of performance, and where the title really is multi-GPU savvy it'll kick in even harder.

Power consumption wise we don't see anything shocking either really, two 6870 cards peaked towards 275 Watt (graphics cards only) which is slightly above one GeForce GTX 480, these are all 'okay' values considering what we are doing.

So let's round things up, personally we always say stick to one or maybe two high-end cards as there is so much less driver fuzz to worry about. It's like this with ATI, once you pass 2 GPUs you'll often find yourself compromising a lot with new game titles versus multi-GPU support. And this is why today's tested products in 2-way CrossfireX mode work so well.

AMD really does needs to step it up a little more on better and even faster game profile support AND user based and created profiles, period. But sure, we also have to acknowledge here, ATI these days has very solid driver releases and release hotfixes and Crossfire support profiles to address to this concern. Credit where credit is due, the overall experience definitely is very interesting.

If you can pick up a second R6850 or R6870 for the right price and can life with some small catalyst driver incompatibilities (as in the future there's bound to be some), then sure .. we'd give a setup like shown today our two thumbs up. Its a relative easy and affordable way to double up on your game performance, if it's properly supported of course.

  • Leave/read comments on this product
  • Sign up to receive a notice when we publish a new article
  • Or go back to Guru3D's front page.




15 pages « < 12 13 14 15



Related Articles
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC review
We test and review the Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC edition, also known under SKU code GV-R7790OC-2GD. We benchmark the product incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming. The Gigabyte HD7790 OC 2GB clocks in at 1075 MHz on the boost engine, packed with totally silent custom cooling.

MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
We test and review the MSI Radeon HD 7790 OC edition, also known under SKU code R7790-1GD5-OC incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming.

Radeon HD 7990 review
We review the new AMD Radeon HD 7990 including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it doing it in style, two fully equipped Tahiti XT2 GPUs versus good yet silent cooling. In this review we'll look at the product, the architecture, the benchmarks, including frametime based FCAT measurements. Head on over towards our AMD Radeon HD 7990.

Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker review
We test and review the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker, this is the much discussed 7870 card that in fact has a 7900 series GPU, the Tahiti LE. For a fair amount of money this series 7800 product now offers 7900 series performance. Armed with 2GB of graphics memory it hits a sweet spot gaming performance wise and to date it one of the more popular products in the mainstream segment. Let's check out the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013