Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 WindForce 3x OC review
GeForce GTX 780 SLI and Multi monitor review
GeForce GTX 780 review
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review

New Downloads
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
PhysX System Software 9.13.0325 Download
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0


New Forum Topics
by: evilkiller650 Overheating CPU affect game performance?by: Stone Gargoyle Xbox World reveals Next Gen Xbox?by: stasio Nvidia GeForce 320.18 WHQL Download and Discussionby: Stone Gargoyle Techland Announce Dying Light (PS3/360/PC/PS4/XBOXONE)by: (.)(.) The many faces of a Tyrant.by: Hilbert Hagedoorn GeForce GTX 780 reviewby: ESC GTX 780 Already Announced in China Official Specsby: sqook cuda 5.5 problemby: Anarion F1 2013 threadby: WhiteLightning Sony to Unveil PS3 Successor !!!


Online Users
There are currently 4029 user(s) online:
Arbold, cowie, Crisis66, dox_aus, Erizo, gerardfraser, Ghosty, gladi8r, Google, JEskandari, knuckles84, Lethal Abz, Live Search, milktree, MM10X, Mr.Bigtime, MSN, PhazeDelta1, pimp_gimp, TimmyP, Uncle Dude, Venomsword, Xtreme512, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 CrossfireX » Page 3

Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 CrossfireX

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/02/2008 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

3 - Power Consumption | Heat | Test suite
Tweet


Actual Power consumption

Though Crossfire is real fun and a very fast way to quickly get more performance, it also effectively adds more 'load' on your power bill. Example each added 4870 card can consume up-to 175 Watts per card when 100% stressed.

Typically this number is lower as your GPU in a lot of situation will not reach that TPD (wattage peak). On average we expect a 150 Watt power draw during gaming, per card.

We'll now show you a bunch of tests we have done on overall power consumption of the PC. Looking at it from a performance versus wattage point of view.

The methodology is simple: We have a device constantly monitoring the power draw from the PC. After we have run all our tests and benchmarks we look at the recorded maximum peak; and that's the bulls-eye you need to observe as the power peak is extremely important. Bear in mind that you are not looking at the power consumption of the graphics card, but the consumption of the entire PC.

Our test system contains a Core 2 Duo E8400 Processor@ 3.0 GHz (FSB 1333), the ASUS P5E3 DeLUXE mainboard, stock cooling on the CPU, DVD-rom and a WD Raptor drive. The results:

Videocard

System Under load

Radeon HD 2900 XT

391 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 269 Watt
Radeon HD 4870 334 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 Crossfire (2) 421 Watt
Radeon HD 4870 Crossfire (2) 480 Watt

The monitoring device is reporting a maximum system wattage peak at 480 Watts with 2-way 4870 Crossfire. So with 3-way 4870 CrossfireX that number would be 620-650 Watts. Very scary stuff to be honest.

Heat levels - Be Warned

Typically both the Radeon HD 4850 & 4870 will get very hot. 80-90 degrees C temperatures for these GPUs are pretty normal. The problem with the 4850 is that this heat will be dumped inside your PC. The positive fact about the 4850 is that it is a single slot cooler. Airflow to the cooler is pretty good, though things change when you add a second or even third card as the cards are stacked quite close together and are dumping air inside your case. [Ed - Excellent airflow is required here, or a change of cooling solution]

The positive thing about the dual-slot 4870 is that heat is dumped outside the PC. The downside, the double sized cooler. Two or three next to each other requires you to have a very properly cooled down chassis as there is very little space in-between the cards.

ATI radeon 4800 CrossfireX
The 4870 cards have very little room for proper air-flow, while the air intake is located on the side.

Bear it in mind. For the GPU itself, this heat level is not an issue. In fact a GPU can reach 120 Degrees C before the fuses blow. Yet you need to be aware of the fact that the cards require a constant supply of air-flow in order to keep them from heating up too much.

Please make sure you have a very well ventilated PC.

With that in mind .. let's start some games and see how well they perform.

Hardware and Software Used

Now we begin the benchmark portion of this article, but first let me show you our test system plus the software we used.

Mainboard

ASUS P5E3 DeLUXE mainboard

Processor

Core 2 Duo E8400 Processor@ 3.0 GHz (FSB 1333)

Graphics Cards

Various Radeon HD 4800 series
Various GeForce GTX 200 series

Memory

2048 MB (2x1024MB) DDR3 1333 MHz Corsair

Power Supply Unit

Enermax Galaxy 1000 Watt PSU

Monitor

Dell 3007WFP - up-to 2560x1600

OS related Software

Windows Vista 32-bit
DirectX 9/10 End User Runtime
AT Catalyst Press BETA 8.6 driver & Final 8.6 hotfix
NVIDIA ForceWare 177.34
NVIDIA nForce 590/680i platform driver 9.53

Software benchmark suite

Enemy Territory - QUAKE Wars
Call of Duty 4
Race Driver: GRID
Ghost Recon: Advanced Warrior 2
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
F.E.A.R.
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06

A word about "FPS"

What are we looking for in gaming performance wise? First off, obviously Guru3D tends to think that all games should be played at the best image quality (IQ) possible. There's a dilemma though, IQ often interferes with the performance of a graphics card. We measure this in FPS, the number of frames a graphics card can render per second, the higher it is the more fluently your game will display itself.

A game's frames per second (FPS) is a measured average of a series of tests. That test often is a time demo, a recorded part of the game which is a 1:1 representation of the actual game and its gameplay experience. After forcing the same image quality settings; this time-demo is then used for all graphics cards so that the actual measuring is as objective as can be.

Frames per second Gameplay
<30 FPS very limited gameplay
30-40 FPS average yet very playable
40-60 FPS good gameplay
>60 FPS best possible gameplay
  • So if a graphics card barely manages less than 30 FPS, then the game is not very playable, we want to avoid that at all cost.
  • With 30 FPS up-to roughly 40 FPS you'll be very able to play the game with perhaps a tiny stutter at certain graphically intensive parts. Overall a very enjoyable experience. Match the best possible resolution to this result and you'll have the best possible rendering quality versus resolution, hey you want both of them to be as high as possible.
  • When a graphics card is doing 60 FPS on average or higher then you can rest assured that the game will likely play extremely smoothly at every point in the game, turn on every possible in-game IQ setting.
  • Over 100 FPS? You have either a MONSTER of graphics card or a very old game.




8 pages « 2 3 4 5 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » Radeon HD 4850 and 4870 CrossfireX » Page 3

Related Articles
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
We test and review the MSI Radeon HD 7790 OC edition, also known under SKU code R7790-1GD5-OC incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming.

Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC review
We test and review the Gigabyte Radeon HD 7790 2GB OC edition, also known under SKU code GV-R7790OC-2GD. We benchmark the product incl FCAT Frametimes. The new graphics card is intended to boost a little more performance into entry-level gaming. The Gigabyte HD7790 OC 2GB clocks in at 1075 MHz on the boost engine, packed with totally silent custom cooling.

Radeon HD 7990 review
We review the new AMD Radeon HD 7990 including FCAT frametime measurements. The dual GPU product that you guys learned to know under codename Malta finally is released. AMD it doing it in style, two fully equipped Tahiti XT2 GPUs versus good yet silent cooling. In this review we'll look at the product, the architecture, the benchmarks, including frametime based FCAT measurements. Head on over towards our AMD Radeon HD 7990.

Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker review
We test and review the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker, this is the much discussed 7870 card that in fact has a 7900 series GPU, the Tahiti LE. For a fair amount of money this series 7800 product now offers 7900 series performance. Armed with 2GB of graphics memory it hits a sweet spot gaming performance wise and to date it one of the more popular products in the mainstream segment. Let's check out the Club3D Radeon HD 7870 Joker.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013