Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013

New Downloads
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1
AS SSD Benchmark Download v1.7.4739.38088
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.4 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: Andrew Neilson Replacment for dogy Nvidia cards in ATIby: AC_Avatar100400 Hyper 212 Evo Stock Fan Replacementby: ozdennisb i7 3770k compatibilityby: HonoredShadow Does the 'Use Nvidia settings' mean what I think it means?by: BlackZero Downsampling with AMD: Guide and Demonstrationby: aircool Battlefield 3 (Official Thread) Pt. 3by: Ralph Kerbal Space Programby: captain_trips 700 series might be coming out next month, as well as Titan Ultraby: NiukNiuk Guild Wars 2 Design Manifestoby: Hilbert Hagedoorn EVGA Teases ACX Graphics Card Cooler


Online Users
There are currently 2482 user(s) online:
AbjectBlitz, Arbold, dumbie, eclap, Gibbonlimbs, Google, Kaerar, Live Search, Loophole35, Memorian, Mraz, MSN, rap1d, remicius, RoadKillNL, sano614, spajdrik, stojo, Supertribble, The_Fool, Yahoo, zaprau


Guru3D.com » Review » POV GeForce GTX 460 768MB TGT Ultra Charged review » Page 2

POV GeForce GTX 460 768MB TGT Ultra Charged review

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 08/22/2010 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

The GPU that makes it happen ... GF104
Tweet

 

The GPU that makes it happen  ... GF104

So then, the GeForce GTX 460. We are first going to discuss REFERENCE specifications, clocks and features.

Typically we dive deeply into the graphics core architecture. For this article, being very lengthy, I would like to keep things a little bit more simple and easy to grasp -- to keep things understandable.

The GeForce GTX 460 series is to be based on a new chip, initially the Fermi architecture that you have all seen on the GTX 465, 470 and 480 is based on the GF100 chip. The Mid-range GeForce GTX 460 is still based on that Fermi architecture, yet for this round NVIDIA designed a new chip, so this is not a GF100 with disabled Shader clusters. Make no mistake here, the architecture is still based on Fermi, same setup, same caches, yet now a much smaller chip with less transistors (2.1 Billion to be precise), called the GF104. GF104 is a less complicated chip to manufacture as the smaller transistor count directly relates to better yields, heat levels, better voltages and thus a better TDP as well. It is a smaller chip to produce.

For this round NVIDIA will put the GF104 chip onto two products, the GeForce GTX 460 with 768MB of graphics memory and the GeForce GTX 460 with 1024MB of memory. For the bigger part of the specifications, the two are similar when it comes to shader processor count, memory bus and clock frequencies, the 1GB model however definitely will be a good chunk faster, as cutting away 256MB of memory also cuts away a chunk of the ROP engine.

So you might wonder, why two models? Well, initially we felt that the 768MB version would end up in OEM mostly, then again, at sub-200 USD this card surprised us as it offers a lot of bang for buck alright. Who knows, time will tell which model will sell the best. Regardless of its 768MB of memory, as we'll demonstrate it is a sexy performer in the mid-range for sure.

Yes, performance wise these cards will be really interesting. But we'd almost forget that the GeForce GTX 460 cards will be fully fledged DirectX 11 class cards with nice tessellation performance and the full DX11 API feature set. Though only a handful of games really show significant DX11 class quality, we really feel that if you are in the market for a new graphics card, DX11 is obviously the path to follow.

Should you not yet be familiar with DirectX 11 and stuff like shaders and Tessellation, we'll explain all that in our standard skinny of content over the next few pages as well, don't worry... this is Guru3D.com and we explain everything as much as we can in understandable wording and terms. Let's compare some of the specs to the GeForce GTX 465, which we really think will go EOL real fast, real soon, as the GTX 460 cards are equally fast and often even faster due to all the OC edition SKUs.

Reference specifications:

Graphics card GeForce GTX 460 768MB GeForce GTX 460 1024MB GeForce GTX 465 1024MB
Graphics Processing Clusters 2 2 3
Streaming Multiprocessors 7 7 11
Shader processor 336 336 352
Texture Units 56 56 44
ROPs 24 32 32
Core Clock 675 MHz 675 MHz 607 MHz
Shader Clock 1350 MHz 1350 MHz 1215 MHz
Memory Data rate 3600 MHz 3600 MHz 3200 MHz
Graphics Memory 768MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5
Memory interface 192-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s 115.2 GB/s 102.6 GB/S
Texture Fillrate Bilinear 37.8 GigaTexels/sec 37.8 GigaTexels/sec 26.7 GigaTexels/sec
Fab node 40nm 40nm 40nm
TDP 150 Watts 160 Watts 200 Watts

 

If you look closely at the SM partitions, then you can see and calculate that the 336 Shader processors based GF104 has in fact eight SM partitions. 7 are enabled = 336 Shader processors. But expect another SKU in the future as well, as that GPU really has 384 shader processors.

Okay, so back to the two reference SKUs, let me break them down real simple:

  • GeForce GTX 460 768MB - 336 Shader processor - 56 TMUs - 24 ROPs - TDP 22/150W - MSRP 199 USD
  • GeForce GTX 460 1024MB -336 Shader processor - 56 TMUs - 32 ROPs - TDP 22/160W - MSRP 229 USD

So, both cards in reference setup will be clocked at 675 MHz on the core frequency, and in NVIDIA's typical 1:2 setup mode 1350 MHz on the 336 shader processors. There will be a lot of overclocking headroom on these boards as 800 MHz should not be an issue (even without voltage tweaking). The gDDR5 memory will be clocked at a slightly shy 3.6 Gbps which is 3600MHz effective (quad data rate). The 768MB version then will make use of three 64-bit memory controllers which boils down to 192-bit memory, and the 1024 GB model has one extra cluster of 256MB attached to it, which requires one more 64-bit memory controller and this one operates at 256-bit memory bus width.

The cards are based on a dual-slot cooling design and come with two dual-link DVI and a mini-HDMI connector. HDMI will again pass through sound including bit streaming support for Dolby True HD and DTS-HD Master. Being a mid-range product, only 2-way SLI will be allowed and thus you'll only see a single SLI finger/connector on the PCBs. Okay, the next stop will be an extensive photo-shoot.





21 pages 1 2 3 4 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » POV GeForce GTX 460 768MB TGT Ultra Charged review » Page 2

Related Articles
POV GeForce GTX 460 768MB TGT Ultra Charged review
We test and review the Point of View GeForce GTX 460 768MB TGT Ultra Charged.

PoV GeForce FX 5500 Review
When I first asked NVIDIA about the 5500 they seemed utterly surprised and asked why I was reviewing a 5500. Hey it's a big market and NVIDIA sells more low and mid end products then high-end. So why not ?

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013