Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
EVGA GeForce GTX 780 SC ACX review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 WindForce 3x OC review
GeForce GTX 780 SLI and Multi monitor review
GeForce GTX 780 review
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review

New Downloads
PrecisionX Download Version 4.2.0
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
PhysX System Software 9.13.0325 Download
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download


New Forum Topics
by: kens30 Sandy and Ivy bridge owners 24/7 clocks?by: blesner Dust: An Elysian Tail coming to Steam...TODAY!by: Jonnyboy Problem after problemby: msi-afterburner MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10(2013-05-22)by: jbscotchman i5 760 running extremely hot or a bad temperature sensor?by: Agent-A01 Geforce GTX TITAN Owner Clubby: WhiteLightning Sony to Unveil PS3 Successor !!!by: Hilbert Hagedoorn GeForce GTX 780 reviewby: slick3 UEFA Champions League !by: Heihachi88 Does anyone getting black squares in firefox using catalyst 13.1 - 13.2 beta3


Online Users
There are currently 2463 user(s) online:
Biały Wilk, crap daddy, Djoums, d_mouse, FatBoyNL, Google, gunman127, MSN, rap1d, Templ, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » OCZ Vertex 2 SSD review » Page 3

OCZ Vertex 2 SSD review

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/02/2010 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

OCZ Vertex 2 Series SATA II 2.5" SSD
Tweet

 

OCZ Vertex 2 Series SATA II 2.5" SSD

OCZ has started to introduce new SSDs based on SandForce controllers into the market, we expect good availability in May 2010. The performance of this all new SandForce 1200 based SSD is advertised at 285/275MB/Sec (Read/Write). This SSD series will become available in somewhat unusual 50GB, 100GB and 200GB volume storage sizes.

Check out the features

  • Available in 50GB, 100GB, and 200GB capacities
  • Native TRIM support
  • Max IOPS Firmware
  • Seek Time: .1ms
  • Slim 2.5" Design
  • 99.8 x 69.63 x 9.3mm
  • Lightweight: 77g
  • Operating Temp: 0°C ~ 70°C
  • Storage Temp: -45°C ~ +85°C
  • Low Power Consumption: 2W in operation,
    .5W in standby
  • Shock Resistant up to 1500G
  • RAID Support
  • Included 3.5" Desktop adapter bracket
  • Compatible with Windows XP, Vista, 7, and Linux
  • MTBF: 2 million hours
  • Max Read: up to 285MB/s
  • Max Write: up to 275MB/s
  • Sustained Write: up to 250MB/s
  • Random Write 4KB (Aligned): 50,000 IOPS
  • 50GB - OCZSSD2-2VTX50G
  • 100GB - OCZSSD2-2VTX100G
  • 200GB - OCZSSD2-2VTX200G

The OCZ Vertex 2 utilizes SandForce's latest version of the SF-1200 controller, which will be adopted by other players in the market as well, e.g. ADATA, Corsair, GSKILL. The controller adds support for newer NAND memory types as in 34nm memory. New 34nm NAND Flash memory is cheaper to manufacture, thus cheaper for companies to implement, and for you as a consumer cheaper to purchase.

The read and write speeds for the tested 100GB model are advertised at a blazing 285 MB/sec read and 275MB/sec write performance (measured with ATTO test software), which makes the product position itself in the extreme high-end SSD segment. Good performance but at a price alright.

Now normally we see the competitive Indilinx Barefoot controller paired with 64MB of Elpida cache memory in the latest SSDs. SandForce however does not need that cache memory. Sandforce uses some sort of real-time data compression, saving on cache needs enabling it to write random I/O extremely fast. To manage all the multi-channel controller loving embedded into the controller we see a tiny processor inside the controller, and next to it a small memory cache, likely a couple of MB's, this figure has not been released to public though. So yeah, there is some cache memory yet it's inside the controller.

Why is that cache so important to that random I/O you ask. Well, history learned us the hard way that most budget SSDs had a 1st generation JMicron controller with very little cache (8KB / 16KB), and the issue there is that if they need to write a lot of really small files simultaneously these drives started to choke up every now and then, your a-typical data bottleneck within a storage unit. Large data-caches solve that issue very well.

By the way,  JMicron now has a bit of a bad reputation in the SSD market because its controllers suffered from that bottleneck issue due to lacking caches, but the new JMF612 incorporates 128MB of DDR2 cache for stuffer-free performance.

So a big help totally bypassing the small files issue for SSD drives is using a nice big mamma SDRAM buffer, or the approach that SandForce takes should be more than sufficient as well. Let's strip the product down though.

OCZ Vertex 2

In the above photo we see the SSD. To the right we spot MLC flash NAND memory chips, the Vertex 2 is paired with the newer 34nm (MLC) flash memory chips. Including a count on the backside we spot 16 chips in total, each with a 6.25GB capacity for a total drive size of 100GB.

OCZ Vertex 2

To the middle you can spot the SandForce SF1200 controller chip. Everything combined form the heart and soul of the SSD. OCZ is clearly using their own design PCB.

OCZ Vertex 2

We have stated it many times and explained this quite a bit, but the seek time on SSD drives are insane; nothing short of amazing, at less than 1ms -- 0.1ms as we actually can measure. The average seek time for a traditional HDD is roughly 9ms. Do the math, hey, no more moving and spinning mechanical components is the key here.

The traditional HDD is a limiting factor on the overall PC experience. Also, storage performance like this will, for example, greatly enhance load times of Photoshop, Generic applications, Office, games load times and even simple stuff like browsing the web will become a much faster experience.





13 pages « 2 3 4 5 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » OCZ Vertex 2 SSD review » Page 3

Related Articles
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
In this article we test, benchmark and review the all new OCZ Vertex 450 SSD. Armed with the new Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller this is the fifth incarnation of the popular OCZ Vertex series. Will it be as fast and competitive as it's predecessors ? Well let's see and find out shall we ?

OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
In this article we test, benchmark and review the OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD. What a great and fast piece of technology this is. An 20nm NAND flash SSD that is speedy and actually amongst the the rest of the devices tested, but also mroe affordable. Head on over into the review.

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD review with 1.5 firmware
We retest the OCZ Vertex 4 SSD yet now with 1.5 firmware update. , again bringing more performance towards the Vertex 4 series of SSDs. And albeit the difference is not as big as the 1.4 release was, it certainly makes a difference as this article will show you.

OCZ Vertex 4 SSD revisited with FW 1.4RC review
We revisit the OCZ Vertex 4 256 and 512GB SSD review, this time with Firmware 1.4 which makes the drives much faster. Armed with a new Indilinx Everest 2 controller this SSD is advertised as one of the fastest on the block with screaming IOPs performance. Lets have a look shall we ?

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013