The Battlefield series has been running for quite a while. The last big entry in the series, Bad Company, was a console exclusive, much to the disappointment of PC gamers everywhere. DICE broke the exclusivity with the sequel, thankfully, and now PC owners are treated to the best Battlefield since Battlefield 2.
The plot follows the four soldiers of Bad Company as they track down a "new" super weapon in development by Russian forces. You might not immediately get that this game is about Bad Company, as the intro mission starts off with a World War II raid, but it all links together in the end.
A new title in the benchmark test suite, it's Battlefield Bad Company 2. Next to being a great game for gameplay, it's also an awesome title to test both graphics cards and processors with. The game has native support for DirectX 11 and on the processor testing side of things, parallelized processing supporting two to eight parallel threads, which is great if you have a quad core (or hexacore) processor.
This is currently a title on the market that utilizes multi-CPU cores and is heavily multi-threaded. Battlefield Bad Company 2 will happily use four or more cores. The result is that very quickly the CPU does not matter anymore as it's maximizing the incredible amount of processor power. As a result the GPU really quickly becomes a bottleneck, even the GeForce GTX 580 is flat out running at 100% whilst the processor has plenty of force left. That would result in very similar performance throughout a large scope of processors.
We opt to test in DX11 / 8xAA for this title as we want to look at the most modern performance and image quality, eg. how you actually play the game at home. DX11 wise we get as extras softened dynamic shadows and shader based performance improvements. A great game to play and a great game image quality wise. We raise the bar, image quality settings wise:
DirectX 11 enabled
8x Multisample Anti-aliasing
16x Anisotropic Filtering
All image quality settings enabled at maximum
Now do not fall under the illusion that the CPU does not matter for gaming. No, it's just that the GPU matters way more. We show these tests based on a real-world scenario and on a current PC gaming system. Were you to, for example, use a multi-GPU fragfest monster of a PC, then the AMD processors will all show lower performance, as core for core the Intel Core i5/i7 series offers more bang, yet not for buck. You can see that really well at 1024x768.
As stated, for real-world gaming experiences with hefty image quality settings like this test the GPU just matters more, BF2 is GPU limited, even the overclock can enforce an impact on that.
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 750 Ti WindForce review In this review we take the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 750 Ti WindForce for a spin. The card is obviously based on NVIDIAs MAxwell based GTX 750 Ti GPU. Gigabyte designed their own PCB, tweaked the card a h...
Gigabyte Radeon R9-290X WindForce 3X OC review We review the Gigabyte Radeon R9-290X WindForce 3X OC edition. A lot of you guys have been waiting on a custom cooled version of this product. Armed with the latest revision of the WindForce 3X cooler and will get that 2816 Stream processor ...
Gigabyte Uranium game mouse review We review the Gigabyte Uranium game mouse, the device is unique in the sense that is comes with an OLED display POD that will inform you of your mouse polling rate, DPI or even battery status. The hig...
Gigabyte G1.Sniper B5 review Let's review the Gigabyte G1.Sniper B5, which is based on the budet B85 chipset from Intel. See B85 based motherboards typically end up in business desktops and normally are limited from overclocking. Well, that changes with the Gigabyte G1.Sniper B5 ! So small price, nice features and tweakability ? We just have to check that out. Oh and you'll get many USB 3.0 ports and of course an improved and enhanced audio solution (albeit that really is a software layer sitting on top of the Realtek ALC 898 codec). Be sure to check out this review.