Before playing games, setting up your monitor's contrast & brightness levels is a very important thing to do. I realized recently that a lot of you guys have set up your monitor improperly. How do we know this? Because we receive a couple of emails every now and then telling us that a reader can't distinguish between the benchmark charts (colors) in our reviews. We realized, if that happens, your monitor is not properly set up.
This simple test pattern is evenly spaced from 0 to 255 brightness levels, with no profile embedded. If your monitor is correctly set up, you should be able to distinguish each step, and each step should be visually distinct from its neighbors by the same amount. Also, the dark-end step differences should be about the same as the light-end step differences. Finally, the first step should be completely black.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (DX9)
Modern Warfare 2 is set five years on from COD4 and brings a new villain into town: Vladimir Makarov. All the trouble start when Makarov frames the US for a terrorist attack on a Russian airport (yes, the infamous airport level). The rest of the story follows the same intertwined British and US mission format as before, and the missions are all incredible set-pieces that involve storming oil rigs, climbing icy cliffs and, of course, an adrenaline packed snowmobile chase. Visually the 3D engine seems to be the same as the COD4 one, it's tweaked and nearly abused to push out the very best of it's capability. The result is a very decent looking game really, smoke, fog, sun, vegetation detailed texturing of objects, buildings and characters.
Our image quality settings selected are the most complex you can set in-game. 4x AA, maxed out anisotropic filtering, the best textures, everything is enabled to it's maximum capability. Any decent graphics card can run the game, it's that simple. There's no need to give in to lower quality settings.
Image Quality setting:
16x Anisotropic Filtering
All settings maxed out
We'll do two charts per test session / game today. Above the results for a single and two cards in SLI. That is your scaling performance as shown above, COD in the past did not scale really well... here it's quite good really.
The 2nd chart is as comparative chart, a performance chart if you will. Dark orange is the SLI test. As much as we could we added other SLI and Crossfire tests in these charts BUT and I do want to make this clear, some of the older cards were done with slightly older drivers as it is impossible to keep all results continuously updated. That can make a marginal difference here and there.
We use the GeForce Forceware 263.09 beta driver with the GTX 570'ies. On ATI's side we advise you to mostly compare to the new 6800 series, as these are fully up-to date with Catalyst 10.10 / 10.11 drivers and the very latest Crossfire profile patch to be certain that Crossfire profiles are working properly in all games. Bare in mind though that a R6870 is in fact slightly slower than an R5870.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 and 980 reference review A while ago Nvidia launched the GeForce GTX Titan Black which we review. We never tested it as it was supposed to be a professional series and targeted card. Nvidia's Board partners however are slowl...
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming review After the reference review we will now review the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 SOC gaming graphics card. Armed with a totally custom design, two 8-pin power feeds and an all new WindForce based cooler ...
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 Gaming review Next to the flagship product we also test the more budget Gigabyte GeForce GTX 970 G1 SOC gaming graphics card. The product does not vary much from that 980 other then a chunk of performance. This car...
MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming OC review We review the new MSI GeForce GTX 970 Gaming OC edition. This affordable model comes with the new TwinFrozr V cooler. The GM204-200 chip is smacked onto a custom PCB surrounded with Military class co...