Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013

New Downloads
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1
AS SSD Benchmark Download v1.7.4739.38088
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.4 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: The Laughing Ma Any theories on what happened here?by: morbias Eurovision 2013by: villa_youth Metro: Last Lightby: xodius80 Will this be an Updrageby: Caenlen Can I put Arctic MX-4 on my GPU VRM?by: greg1993 GTX 660 sucks?by: Noisiv Nvidia GeForce 320.14 BETA - Download and Discussionby: BLEH! Hostile Superioirty-Complex Co-Workers - What to do?by: killer_939 Considering going water, need advice :)by: evilkiller650 Overheating CPU affect game performance?


Online Users
There are currently 2599 user(s) online:
airbud7, dsbig, Ghosty, Google, IchimA, Live Search, MSN, pbvider, rap1d, S3nt3nc3, StewieTech, volkov956, Xentinel, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » GeForce GTX 275 review | test » Page 2

GeForce GTX 275 review | test

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 04/01/2009 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

The GeForce GTX 275 GPU
Tweet


The GeForce GTX 275 GPU

So I'd like to start off with a little 101 on the GTX 200 series GPU. The GTX 275 is all about the 55nm fabrication based product series GTX 200. The GTX series 200 GPU sums up to 1400 million transistors. It's the biggest beast of a graphics processor that NVIDIA has ever built with 1400 million transistors.

1400 million transistors, think of a transistor as an on/off switch on = 1 and off = 0.

Now imagine 1400 million transistors times the clock frequency of the GPU ( this determines how many times per second the transistors can change state, or, rather, switch between 1 and 0).

Then take a MHz, 1 MHz denotes one million hertz or one million cycles per second. I don't know what will drive you more nuts; thinking about the number of operations going on in a GPU0, or squeezing your left nut. Think about that for a minute you might go nuts.

GeForce GTX 260/275/285

  • 1.4 billion transistors
  • 993 GigaFLOP processing power
  • 240 processing (shader) cores (GTX 275/285)
  • 55nm node fabrication
  • DirectX 10
  • New power management enhancements
  • CUDA parallel processing
  • GeForce PhysX

How different is the GTX 275 to the GTX 285? A very valid question, the answer is: for you as an end user, not much. In fact, the very same GPU has been utilized bringing 240 stream processors to the GTX 275.

What is different though is that the GTX 275 obviously had to be a tad slower than big daddy GTX 285. Therefore NVIDIA gave it the GTX 260 memory configuration, 896 MB of gDDR3 memory over a 448-bit bus (opposed to 512bit). It gives the product a 127 GB/s bandwidth.

The new GeForce GTX 275 reference based product will run at a core clock frequency of 632 MHz. There are more clocked domains inside that GPU though, the shader processors run at 1404 MHz and the memory is at 1134 MHz (effectively 2268 MHz). And though that is a higher clock opposed to the previous GTX 280, it is slightly slower than a GTX 285. But really, it accounts for only a little performance differential.

  GeForce GTX
260
GeForce GTX
275
GeForce GTX
280
GeForce GTX
285
GeForce GTX
295
Stream (Shader) Processors 192 240 240 240 240 x2
Core Clock (MHz) 576 632 602 648 576
Shader Clock (MHz) 1242 1404 1296 1476 1242
Memory Clock (MHz) x2 999 1134 1053 1242 999
Memory amount 896 MB 896 MB 1024 MB 1024 MB 1792 MB
Memory Interface 448-bit 448-bit 512-bit 512-bit 448-bit x2
HDCP Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Two Dual link DVI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

For the folks that like to go a little deeper: this high-end part has 896MB of GDDR3 memory which has a 448-bit memory bus that binds to seven 64-bit memory controllers inside the GPU.

When we follow that good old pixel pipeline we run into a ROP (Raster Operation) domain. The GTX 275 has 28 of them and 80 texture filtering units. Performance accounts up to roughly 1 TFLOP (depending how you measure it actually).

What's nice about the GTX 275 release is that it is based off the new 55nm fabrication process, this has several advantages. The new 55nm GTX series 200 GPUs require a little less voltage, as a result it consumes less power. You'll spot two 6-pin connectors on the boards, whereas the GTX 280 for example still had one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector for it's feed.

The TDP (peak wattage) is now roughly 219 Watts. The product got faster, yet consumes less power. Cast your mind back to the GeForce 8800 Ultra which used 235W (peak) where we now see cards perform at least twice as much with less power needed. Performance per Watt again has increased on many fronts, which is good as it's the green thing to do.

As stated the GTX 275 is fed by two six-pin connectors. Power consumption for this 10.5-inch board is ~219W. 

GeForce GTX 275 reference review





20 pages 1 2 3 4 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » GeForce GTX 275 review | test » Page 2

Related Articles
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
In this article we review the ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini edition, a compact performance graphics card designed primarily for small form factor PCs with mini ITX motherboards. The dual-slot card measures just 17cm and features the NVIDIA GTX 670 GPU. ASUS has re-engineered the DirectCU cooler to fit small form factor cases. While shorter, it introduces a copper vapor chamber placed directly on top of the GPU for faster heat spreading and dispersal with 20% lower temperatures than reference GTX 670.

MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
In this article we review the MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC edition review with that OC for a factory tweak. The product is customized with a new PCB, cooling and a few tweaks, it has 2GB of memory with both that memory and the core base-clock slightly overclocked. Overall an interesting product at an interesting price in the lower segment of the mainstream market.

EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost SC edition review
In this article we review the EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost SC edition review with that SC for superclocked. The product is fairly reference looking but does come with EVGA's own styled cooler, it has 2GB of memory with both that memory and the core baseclock slightly overclocked quite significant.

Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC edition review
For this review we test and benchmark the Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC edition. The product comes customized with their own PCB design, a dual-fan cooler, 2GB of memory with both that memory and the core baseclock slightly overclocked.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013