Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VII HERO (Wifi) review
MSI X470 Gaming M7 AC review
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X review
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X review
NZXT Kraken X72 Review
HP EX900 500GB M.2. SSD review
be quiet! Dark Rock PRO 4 review
be quiet! Dark Rock 4 review
ASUS ROG STRIX B360-F Gaming review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v3.1.133
Corsair Utility Engine Download (CUE) Download v2.24.50
Corsair Link Download v4.9.7.35
HWiNFO64 Download v5.82
PCMark 10 Download v1.0.1493
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 17.0.8.5
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 15.65.5.4982
AIDA64 Download version 5.97
GeForce 391.35 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 18.3.4 Driver download


New Forum Topics
Sharp launches its first 70inch TV with 8K panel: LV-70X500E So Sic of STUDDDDEERRING! Review: Gigabyte Aorus X470 Gaming 7 Wifi AMD Adds Ryzen 2400GE and Ryzen 3 2200GE (35W) to APU Lineup Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX PowerColor Teases Radeon RX Vega Nano High-end GPU price drops ? (Dutch/Eu market) Coffee lake 6 core now booting on z270 Upgrade to i8700k or wait 2700x wrong temp readings?? any advice?




Guru3D.com » Review » Force3D Radeon HD 4870 512MB DHT review » Page 2

Force3D Radeon HD 4870 512MB DHT review - 2 - AMD's Radeon series 4800 chipset

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/19/2008 02:00 PM [ ] 0 comment(s)

Tweet


AMD's Radeon series 4800 chipset

As you guys know by now ATI's Radeon HD 4850/4870 are both using the same GPU (graphics processor). The codename for these chips is RV770. AMD put nearly a billion transistors into that GPU, which is now built upon a 55nm (260 mm2 Die size) production. The chip literally is 16 mm wide and high. Which for AMD still is quite large, for a 55nm product. The number of transistors for a midrange product like this is extreme and typically it's best to directly relate that to the number of shader processors to get a better understanding. But first let's look at some nice examples of Die sizes of current architectures.

The Radeon 4850/4870 series graphics processors have 800 scalar processors (320 on the HD 3800 series) and now have a significant forty texture units (was 16 in last-gen architecture). The stream/compute/shader processors (can we please just name them all shader processors?) definitely had a good number of changes; if you are into this geek talk, you'll spot 10 SIMD clusters each carrying 80 32-bit shader processors (this accumulates to 800). If I remember correctly, one SIMD unit can handle double precision.

Much like we recently noticed in the NVIDIA GTX 200 architecture, the 80 scalar stream processors per SIMD unit have 16KB of local data cache/buffer that is shared among the shader processors. Next to the hefty shader processor increase you probably already notice the massive amount of texture units. In the last generation product we noticed 16 units, the 4800 series has 40 units.

When you do some quick math, that's 2.5x the number of shader processors over the last-gen product, and 2.5x the number of texture units. That's a pretty grand change folks. Since the GPU has 800 shader processors it can produce the raw power of 1000 to 1200 GFlops in simple precision. It's a bit lame and inaccurate to do but divide the number of ATI's scalar shader processors with the number 5 and you'll roughly equal the performance to NVIDIA's stream processor. You could (in an abstract way) say that the 4800 series have 160 shader units, if that helps you compare it towards NVIDIA's scaling. Again there's nothing scientific or objective about that explanation.

Effectively combined with the clock speed and memory this product can poop out 1000/1200 GigaFLOPs of performance. Depending on how that is measured of course. But still, with an entry product at 199 USD for the 4850 and 299 USD for the 4870 that's just an awful lot of computing power. Let's compile a chart:

 

ATI Radeon
HD 4850

ATI Radeon
HD 4850 1GB

ATI Radeon
HD 3850
ATI Radeon
HD 4870
# of transistors

965 million

965 million

666 million 965 million

Stream Processing Units

800

800

320 800

Clock speed

625 MHz

625 MHz

670 MHz 750 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz GDDR3 (effective)

1800 MHz GDDR3 (effective)

1.66 GHz GDDR3 (effective) 3600 MHz GDDR5 (effective)

Math processing rate (Multiply Add)

1000 GigaFLOPS

1200 GigaFLOPS

428 GigaFLOPS 1200 GigaFLOPS

Texture Units

40

40

16 40

Render back-ends

16

16

16 16

Memory

512MB GDDR3

512MB GDDR5

512MB GDDR3 512MB GDDR5

Memory interface

256-bit

256-bit

256-bit 256-bit

Fabrication process

55nm

55nm

55nm 55nm

Power Consumption (peak)

~110W

~110W

~90W ~160W

Next to internal efficiency improvements we also stumble into an updated UVD engine (HD video decoder/accelerator/enhancer).




14 pages 1 2 3 4 next »



Related Articles
Force3D Radeon HD 4870 512MB DHT review
Today we test the Force3D Radeon HD 4870 512MB DHT. Force3D are up and coming, and working hard on product differentiation. Along that line they introduce a Radeon HD 4870 512MB model with Freezer DHT cooler.

© 2018