Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 780 WindForce 3x OC review
GeForce GTX 780 SLI and Multi monitor review
GeForce GTX 780 review
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC WindForce 2X review
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review

New Downloads
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
PhysX System Software 9.13.0325 Download
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0


New Forum Topics
by: kens30 Sandy and Ivy bridge owners 24/7 clocks?by: Jetl33 Rampage iv formula CPU infoby: Hilbert Hagedoorn Microsoft Xbox One console shownby: stasio Nvidia GeForce 320.18 WHQL Download and Discussionby: dk_lightning Mouse/Input Lagby: FULMTL Headphone talkby: blesner Will Next Gen Consoles be more powerful then PC on launchby: Hilbert Hagedoorn GeForce GTX 780 reviewby: hallryu The Guru3D Screenshot Thread - RTFM! #22 (Rules update!)by: mbk1969 Windows: Line-Based vs. Message Signaled-Based Interrupts ...


Online Users
There are currently 2434 user(s) online:
EugeneF, Google, harkinsteven, Kodiak33, MAIAL, mbk1969, Mraz, Mr_ALLroy, MSN, NAZ2222, Stone Gargoyle, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » ECS GeForce GTX 560 » Page 2

ECS GeForce GTX 560

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 05/16/2011 01:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Features and specifications
Tweet


Features and specifications

So before we begin, we need to explain the differences in-between a GTX 560 regular and the GTX 560 Ti editions. Ti will be the more advanced version whereas the regular editions will be a notch slower as one cluster of shader processors (SM) was cut off.

Both products are based on the GF114 GPU whereas the GTX 460 based based on the GF104 GPU, it is tweaked a little though to allow higher clock speeds with presumably a lower power draw.

  • The GeForce GTX 560 Ti has 384 shader processor cores, 32 ROPs, and a 256-bit wide memory interface that connects to four 64-bit controllers each with 256MB memory tied to them.
  • The GeForce GTX 560 has 336 shader processor cores, 32 ROPs, and a 256-bit wide memory interface that connects to four 64-bit controllers each with 256MB memory tied to them.
  • The GeForce GTX 460 has 336 shader processor cores, 32 ROPs, and a 256-bit wide memory interface that connects to four 64-bit controllers each with 256MB memory tied to them.

So with some shader processors disabled, the GTX 560 is spec by spec precisely the same as the GTX 460. But the based on the GF114 GPU, it allows it to be clocked higher, overclocked you might see products even nearing 1 GHz on the graphics core.

The new GPU has holstered a higher GPU clock speed, with 810 MHz core, 1620MHz on the shader cores, and 4008 MHz (GDDR5 effective datarate) memory, churning out a very decent 128 GB/s in memory bandwidth.

Now, most of all this sounds familiar eh? Yeah... remember the GF104 being used in the GeForce GTX 460 series? The new GF114 is in fact based of that IC, yet now with all shader processors enabled.

For the bigger part of the specifications the two feel similar when it comes to shader processor count, memory bus and clock frequencies, the GTX 560 definitely will be a good chunk faster.

Reference specifications:

Graphics card GeForce GTX 460
1024MB
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 1024MB GeForce
GTX 560
ECS
GTX 560
Sonic
Graphics Processing Clusters 2 2 2 2
Streaming Multiprocessors 7 8 7 7
Shader processor 336 384 336 336
Texture Units 56 64 56 56
ROPs 32 32 32 32
Core Clock 675 MHz 822 MHz 810 MHz 810 MHz
Shader Clock 1350 MHz 1644 MHz 1620 MHz 1620 MHz
Memory Data rate 3600 MHz 4008 MHz 4008 MHz 4008 MHz
Graphics Memory 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5
Memory interface 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit
Memory bandwidth 115 GB/s 128 GB/S 128 GB/S 134 GB/S
Fab node 40nm 40nm 40nm 40nm
TDP 160 Watts 170 Watts 150 Watts 150 Watts

If you look closely at the SM (Streaming Multiprocessor) partitions below, then you can see and calculate that a 336 shader processor based GF104 on the GeForce GTX 460 has in fact seven SM partitions. 7 are enabled = 336 Shader processors.

Not the GF114 GPU has 384 shader processors, and has that last available SM cluster enabled for the Ti model, yet what you need to remember is that for the regular GTX 560 only 7 SMs are enabled... thus it has 336 Shader/Cuda/Stream processor units.

The GeForce GTX 560 is based on a 40nm fabrication node, still has 1.95 billion transistors and thus looks and feels like the GTX 460, yet now with 48 shader processors per SM and accompanying PolyMorph Engine added. All cards derived from and based on this GPU will be based on a dual or even triple-slot cooling design based on what the AIB/AIC partners prefer and come with two dual-link DVI and a mini-HDMI connector. HDMI will again pass sound through, including bit streaming support for Dolby True HD and DTS-HD Master.

Being a mid-range product, only 2-way SLI will be allowed and thus you'll only see a single SLI finger/connector on the PCB. Okay, the next stop will be an extensive photo-shoot of today's tested product.

In this article we test the ECS GeForce GTX 560 which we'll have a closer look at in a minute, but first the following.





23 pages 1 2 3 4 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » ECS GeForce GTX 560 » Page 2

Related Articles
ECS GeForce GTX 560
The GeForce GTX 560 we'll review in this article comes from ECS, out of the three products GTX 560 tested today here on Guru3D.com this one is reference clocked, has a reference design and a reference cooler. So this product will be the baseline performance product. Now that does not mean a sober product contrary, baseline performance is pretty good for the money. And next to that, we all know you'll gain the most from the less expensive products one you go and tweak them.

ECS GeForce GTX 460 Black review
We review the ECS GeForce GTX 460 Black series. Within the entire scope of Fermi GPU based graphics cards from NVIDIA the GeForce GTX 460 has to be the most interesting in terms of value for money with very acceptable decent thermals and power consumption. This is why we see a lot of SKU's released for this product, with a variety of cooling and factory overclocks. ECS Elite group also release a handful of GeForce GTX 460 cards, based on the reference design, slight overclock yet also a BLACK series graphics card which is a factory overclocked model with an Arctic cooling Accelero Xtreme PRO cooler sitting on top of that GPU.

ECS GeForce GTS 250 1024MB review | test
ECS GeForce GTS 250 tested -- Today the turn goes to the folks at ECS. Ever since the past year or two they have been trying hard to get a grip in the e-tail and retail channel, and as a brand they certainly are growing. With a creative product design and marketing team they present us some fairly special designs and concepts. Today's product tested is not at all different. Though we'll stubble into a reference clocked product, there is very little little reference otherwise.

ECS GeForce 9800 GTX+ Hydra SLI
A review on the ECS GeForce 9800 GTX+ Hydra SLI. Basically you'll receive two pre-modified GeForce 9800 GTX+ products and a water-cooling kit that is supplied by Thermaltake. It's in fact the Thermaltake big water series that you can slide into you 5.25"drive bay easily. Pretty much the only thing you need to do is connect four tubing connections, fill her up, connect some wiring ... and you are good to go. That's 15 minutes tops to get a gaming performance level better than the GeForce GTX 280.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013