Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS Maximus VI Extreme Z87 motherboard review
ASUS GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II OC review
Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 review
Corsair Vengeance K70 review
MSI GeForce GTX 770 Lightning review
EVGA GeForce GTX 770 SC review
Plextor M5M 256GB mSATA SSD review
AMD A10 6800K review
SanDisk Extreme II 120 - 240 and 480 GB SSD review
ASUS Sabertooth Z87 motherboard review

New Downloads
Media Player Classic Home Cinema v1.6.8 Download
Sandra 2013 SP4 19.50 download
MSI Afterburner 3.0.0 Beta 10 Download
AMD Catalyst 13.6 BETA 2 Download
CPU-Z 1.6.4
AIDA64 Download version 3.00
AMD Catalyst 13.6 BETA Download
PrecisionX Download Version 4.2.0
GeForce 320.18 WHQL Driver Download
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.5 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: Hilbert Hagedoorn ECS Reveals its First Motherboard with the AMD Kabini – KBN-Iby: Taint3dBulge AMD FX 9590 to cost $960by: hallryu *-=The Guru of 3D rig gallery rev.2 Part 9=-*by: Hilbert Hagedoorn EA says Frostbite 3 Optimization Not Exclusive to AMDby: yosef019 any benifit 64bit vs 32bit on 3 gb ram for gamesby: Bukkake Another look at HPET High Precision Event Timerby: blesner Tom Clancy's The Division For PCby: villa_youth Metro: Last Lightby: harkinsteven Xbox One at E3 all PC's?by: trodas HP PSC 1315 not scanning


Online Users
There are currently 2506 user(s) online:
CoMa666, dmitrice, Google, Live Search, MSN, Omagana, RoadKillNL, slow_poke, Tyler Dalton, Yahoo, yasamoka


Guru3D.com » Review » AMD Radeon HD 7850 and 7870 review » Page 10

AMD Radeon HD 7850 and 7870 review - Test Environment & equipment

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/04/2012 02:00 PM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Tweet


Test Environment & Equipment

Here is where we begin the benchmark portion of this article, but first let me show you our test system plus the software we used.

Mainboard

MSI Big Bang XPower X58

Processor

Core i7 965 Extreme @ 3750 MHz

Graphics Card

Radeon HD 7850
Radeon HD 7870 - 1 GHz Edition

Memory

6144 MB (3x 2048 MB) DDR3 Corsair @ 1500 MHz

Power Supply Unit

1200 Watt

Monitor

Dell 3007WFP - up to 2560x1600

OS related software

Windows 7 64-bit SP1
DirectX 9/10/11 End User Runtime (latest available)
AMD Catalyst AMD_PitCairn 8.95.5
NVIDIA GeForce series latest WHQL 285.62 WHQL

Software benchmark suite

  • Battlefield 3
  • Battlefield Bad Company 2
  • Far Cry 2
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
  • Crysis 2
  • Anno 1404
  • Anno 2070
  • 3DMark Vantage
  • 3DMark 11
  • Metro 2033
  • Alien vs Predator
  • Lost Planet 2
  • Hard Reset

A word about "FPS"

What are we looking for in gaming, performance wise? First off, obviously Guru3D tends to think that all games should be played at the best image quality (IQ) possible. There's a dilemma though, IQ often interferes with the performance of a graphics card. We measure this in FPS, the number of frames a graphics card can render per second, the higher it is the more fluently your game will display itself.

A game's frames per second (FPS) is a measured average of a series of tests. That test is often a time demo, a recorded part of the game which is a 1:1 representation of the actual game and its gameplay experience. After forcing the same image quality settings; this time-demo is then used for all graphics cards so that the actual measuring is as objective as can be.

Frames per second

Gameplay

<30 FPS

very limited gameplay

30-40 FPS

average yet very playable

40-60 FPS

good gameplay

>60 FPS

best possible gameplay

  • So if a graphics card barely manages less than 30 FPS, then the game is not very playable, we want to avoid that at all cost.
  • With 30 FPS up-to roughly 40 FPS you'll be very able to play the game with perhaps a tiny stutter at certain graphically intensive parts. Overall a very enjoyable experience. Match the best possible resolution to this result and you'll have the best possible rendering quality versus resolution, hey you want both of them to be as high as possible.
  • When a graphics card is doing 60 FPS on average or higher then you can rest assured that the game will likely play extremely smoothly at every point in the game, turn on every possible in-game IQ setting.
  • Over 100 FPS? You either have a MONSTER graphics card or a very old game.

Monitor Setup

Before playing games, setting up your monitor's contrast & brightness levels is a very important thing to do. I realized recently that a lot of you guys have set up your monitor improperly. How do we know this? Because we receive a couple of emails every now and then telling us that a reader can't distinguish between the benchmark charts (colors) in our reviews. We realized, if that happens, your monitor is not properly set up.

This simple test pattern is evenly spaced from 0 to 255 brightness levels, with no profile embedded. If your monitor is correctly set up, you should be able to distinguish each step, and each step should be visually distinct from its neighbors by the same amount. Also, the dark-end step differences should be about the same as the light-end step differences. Finally, the first step should be completely black.





24 pages « < 9 10 11 12 next »



Related Articles
AMD Radeon HD 7850 and 7870 review
We review the AMD Radeon HD 7850 and 7870. These two new mid-range cards are going to shift the dynamics in the graphics arena alright, as the entire package including performance is really impressive for the 7800 series. A product series that is to replace the 6800-series performance-wise, it is based on AMD's 28nm process and of course the latest Graphics Core Next GPU architecture.

AMD Radeon HD 7750 and 7770 review
It's now February 2012 and AMD thinks they have a new '5770' in their hands. The codename is 'Cape Verde' for the GPU, and the graphics cards deriving from them are the Radeon HD 7750 and 7770 One GHz edition. This is not a refresh it is a completely new GPU based on the same technology that powers the R7900 series, the GCN architecture. Head on over to the next page where we'll meet and greet Cape Verde, aka Radeon HD series 7700.

AMD Radeon HD 7970 review
We review the Radeon HD 7970. Injected in the 499 EUR / 549 USD price tag bracket the product will have to compete directly with the equally expensive GeForce GTX 580, it will actually be a decent notch better then that IMHO. The results that you'll witness today will not dishearten. Where it matters (the latest and newer games) the Radeon HD 7970 will be a good 20%, 30% sometimes even 40% faster then the competition, and in the world of enthusiast graphics performance that's what we call, a product with a little extra booty.

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013