The fun thing about this video transcoder is that it can utilize the GPU to assist it with the transcending process. However, you can also solely use the CPU, making this a very interesting benchmark as you can check out behavior of CPU transcoding AND GPU transcoding all in one test.
Above, you can find the results of this new test. In this test we transcode a 200 MB AVCHD 1920x1080i media file to a 1280x720P MP4 binary (YouTube format). This measurement is in seconds needed for the process, thus lower = better.
Multi-threaded Video Transcoding H.264 (DTS5.1) to x.264 AC3 5.1
Video transcoding is well suited for systems that have more CPU cores. Encoding/transcoding to x.264 format is one of the most intensive tasks a processor can perform. As such this is one of the better test in the entire review. We encoded an h.264 DTS 1080P trailer of 150 MB to Matroska x.264 with 5.1 channels AC3. It's compressed in such a way that you can play it back with Haali media splitter and/or FFDSHOW codecs. We use the Handbrake software suite which is multi-core aware... the more processor cores it sees, the faster it can and will transcode. This software is also a perfect benchmark for CPU and memory testing.
The displayed number is the number of frames rendered per second averaged out over the encoding process. The higher the number, the faster the performance is. It's exactly in applications like these where processors with more cores really shine as they are all utilized to the maximum.
Compute wise this title also allows you to enable AVX and OpenCL, so when we enable compute assisted hardware acceleration, that's what happens. Obviously this would go for other processors as well (if enabled). But it certainly does demonstrate what you can achieve with extra hardware acceleration versus video transcoding.
AMD A10 6790 review We review the AMD A10 6790 APU processor, the little brother of the 6800K and the big brother of the 6700 just became available in the stores. With performance close to the 6800 this might be the budg...
AMD A10 6700 review We review the 100 EUR AMD A10 6700 APU processor, the little brother of the 6800K we just reviewed a little while ago. Based on Piledriver architecture this processor slash graphics hybrid symbiosis called APU.
AMD A10 6800K review We review the 125 EUR AMD A10 6800K APU processor. Based on Piledriver architecture this processor slash graphics hybrid symbiosis called APU remains hard to beat in terms of features performance.
AMD A10 5700 review We review the AMD A10 5700 APU processor. Based on the APU architecture and building on the strengths of the Llano design, the 2012 AMD A-Series platform has been updated to meet and exceed the increasing demands of today’s consumers.