GeForce GTX 460 review (roundup)

Graphics cards 1048 Page 23 of 31 Published by

teaser

VGA performance: 3DMark Vantage (DirectX 10)

3DMark Vantage (DirectX 10)

3DMark Vantage focuses on the two areas most critical to gaming performance: the CPU and the GPU. With the emergence of multi-package and multi-core configurations on both the CPU and GPU side, the performance scale of these areas has widened, and the visual and game-play effects made possible by these configurations are accordingly wide-ranging. This makes covering the entire spectrum of 3D gaming a difficult task. 3DMark Vantage solves this problem in three ways:

1. Isolate GPU and CPU performance benchmarking into separate tests,
2. Cover several visual and game-play effects and techniques in four different tests, and
3. Introduce visual quality presets to scale the graphics test load up through the highest-end hardware.

To this end, 3DMark Vantage has two GPU tests, each with a different emphasis on various visual techniques, and two CPU tests, which cover the two most common CPU-side tasks: Physics Simulation and AI. It also has four visual quality presets (Entry, Performance, High, and Extreme) available in the Advanced and Professional versions, which increase the graphics load successively for even more visual quality. Each preset will produce a separate, official 3DMark Score, tagged with the preset in question.

The graphics load increases significantly from the lowest to the highest preset. The Performance preset is targeted for mid-range hardware with 256 MB of graphics memory. The Entry preset is targeted for integrated and low-end hardware with 128 MB of graphics memory. The higher presets require 512 MB of graphics memory, and are targeted for high-end and multi-GPU systems.

Download: 3DMark Vantage

With 3DMark Vantage we look at the two main results it returns in the 'P' performance test. Decent numbers really. A lot can be said about the 3DMark series, yet the GPU score really is good and reproduces a very reliable number that scales pretty darn well and trustworthy. First the reference scores, the 768MB model scores almost 12k in the GPU score and the 1024MB version scores roughly 12.5k

But now let's redraw the chart and include the AIB SKUs, watch that dynamic change real fast:

With a reference card, expect a GPU score of roughly 12.000 points, and depending on your system specifications, roughly 13.500 points for the overall P score if you are on a fast Core i7 platform. When we take the fastest clocked 768MB SKU (eVGA SC) that's a 13.200 point GPU score with roughly 14.800 points on the overall P score. Not bad really.

The reference 1024MB model pulls 12ks GPU and 14k P-score. Now let's take that 1024MB Palit Sonic Platinum -- it scores 14k8 on the GPU score and 16k2 on the overall P-score.

The faster clocked SKUs matter a lot... and I'll let you in on a secret... all cards tested today can be overclocked over 800 MHz easily... even without added GPU voltage. As such we'll be overclocking all cards individually and checking out performance. Let's start off with the first one.

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print