Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
    • Search
    • Submit
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Editorials
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Dated content
    • More Categories
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Knowledgebase
    • Search articles
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • SEARCH
    • Search Articles
    • Search News
    • Search Files
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
MSI Radeon HD 7790 TurboDuo OC review
Metro Last Light VGA Graphics Benchmark performance test
Noctua NH-U12S and NH-U14S review
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU Mini review
OCZ Vertex 3.20 SSD review
Cooler Master Eisberg 240L Prestige review
Guru3D and OCZ Contest - PC Power 1200W PSU Giveaway
MSI GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST OC review
ASUS ROG ORION PRO Gaming Headset Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2013

New Downloads
GPU-Z Download 0.7.1
HWiNFO32 4.18 Download
HWiNFO64 4.18 Download
GeForce 320.14 BETA Driver Download
Nvidia Lifelike Human Face Rendering Tech Demo Download
3DMark Download v1.1.0
XBMC Media Center Download 12.0 2
RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download v5.1.1
AS SSD Benchmark Download v1.7.4739.38088
AMD Catalyst Application Profile Download 13.4 CAP1


New Forum Topics
by: eclap PC won't postby: Jhetski Dan Brown's Inferno - Has anyone read it?by: Hilbert Hagedoorn Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance PC Port Confirmedby: StealBalls Mixing TITANS!by: Syidi question on socket and CPU compatibility?by: stone-eye Video converter ripperby: dellon132 ATI Catalyst 12.11 Beta 11 Modded driver For Legacy GPUby: Rob McClelland New PAX Creative Download section thread.by: Benny_26 Metro Last Light, How to Double, Trippe FPS + Solve Some Glitchesby: Stryfex New rumor regarding GTX 780 pricing


Online Users
There are currently 2232 user(s) online:
ceesay, dcx_badass, FULMTL, Google, HairyCube, Live Search, Memorian, mkh, moab600, MSN, twtaylor, WhiteLightning, Yahoo


Guru3D.com » Review » ForceWare 71.20 Performance Comparison » Page 5

ForceWare 71.20 Performance Comparison

Posted by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 12/13/2004 08:00 AM [ 0 comment(s) ]

Page 5 - Unreal 2004 Performance
Tweet

Benchmarks at Guru3D.com

Unreal Tournament 2004
Added into our wide benchmark suite is Unreal Tournament 2004. The developers of UT2004 didn't want to split hairs with this game. It is still using the same engine and the majority of gameplay elements will be very familiar to players of the 2003 version. If you hated the first game, you'll probably hate this.

Sorry, but that's how it is. This large-scale, vehicle-focused game concentrates and focuses the action so that 12 players can have as much fun as 32. It includes several different gameplay modes including Onslaught, where each team has a power core that they need to protect. Between the teams' power cores are a number of smaller power nodes scattered across the map. Opposing teams battle their way from node to node in an attempt to make a path to their enemy's power core and destroy it.

Buggies, hovercraft, tanks, trucks, space fighters, air fightersÂ… all feature prominently in Unreal Tournament 2004 and huge maps have been made to accommodate them. Basically what we did was record three timedemo botmatch maps, we run all three on set resolutions with Maximum detail settings enabled and the results then are compiled to an average.

UT2004 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
71.20 47 47 47 47
66.81 48 48 48 48
66.51 48 48 48 48
66.29 48 48 48 48
65.73 48 48 48 48
62.20 48 48 48 48
61.82 48 48 48 48
61.77 48 48 48 48

We are using a new high quality timedemo, which should bring even these high-end cards to their knees. Unfortunately I am seeing pure CPU limitation here, on all ForceWare drivers. Basically the graphics card is awaiting the luxury of a faster processor. And yes... this test is at taken with a 3.6 GHz processor!

UT2004 - 4xAA 8xAF 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
71.20 47 47 47 45
66.81 48 47 47 46
66.51 48 48 47 46
66.29 47 47 47 46
65.73 47 47 47 46
62.20 47 47 47 45
61.82 47 47 46 45
61.77 47 47 47 45

The results when we enable 4 levels of AA and 8x AF are not much different. The chart looks a bit weird though, but honestly... you are looking at a 3 frame per second difference between all resolutions. Also again due to CPU limitation.





9 pages « < 4 5 6 7 next »


Guru3D.com » Articles » ForceWare 71.20 Performance Comparison » Page 5

Related Articles
ForceWare 71.20 Performance Comparison
in this article we compare the newer ForceWare 71.20 driver towards older builds with the help of software like Doom3, 3DMark05, Half-life 2, Splinter Cell, Halo and many more.

ForceWare series 6 Driver Performance Comparison
It's been a while since we've handled a an extensive overview of the performance of ForceWare drivers and I had some time to kill last weekend and thus decided to a little ForceWare performance comparison..

Follow Guru3D on Google+ - Facebook - YouTube - Twitter © 2013