Corsair CMX1024-3500LLPRO 2x1024MB -
As you already noticed, this product is made for a rather specific category of PC users, tweakers and overclockers. People who tweak the crap out of their system, I like to call them enthusiasts or if you want, Guru3D's audience. To be able to test this product to it's fullest potential we will need to either tweak or overclock the PC and of course we'll do just that.
Understanding memory timings
Let's explain a little what you will run into with memory timings. First off latency. We used the word numerous times already in this article. Latency is the time between when a request is made and the request is answered. I.E, if you are in a restaurant for a meal, the latency would be the time between when you ordered your meal to the time you received it. Therefore, in memory terms, it is the total time required before data can be written to or read from the memory. Thus lower is better.
Then we notice on the packaging is this: 2-3-2-6 1T for the CMX1024-3500LLPRO 2 GB kit. What do the numbers mean ?
2-3-2-6 1T refers to CAS-tRCD-tRP-tRAS CMD (respectively) and these values are measured in clock cycles.
Undoubtedly, one of the most essential timings is that of the CAS Latency and is also the one most people can actually understand. Since data is often accessed sequentially (same row), the CPU only needs to select the next column in the row to get the next piece of data. In other words, CAS Latency is the delay between the CAS signal and the availability of valid data on the data pins (DQ). Therefore, the latency between column accesses (CAS), plays an important role in the performance of the memory. The lower the latency, the better the performance. However, the memory modules must be capable of supporting low latency settings.
There is a delay from when a row is activated to when the cell (or column) is activated via the CAS signal and data can be written to or read from a memory cell. This delay is called tRCD. When memory is accessed sequentially, the row is already active and tRCD will not have much impact. However, if memory is not accessed in a linear fashion, the current active row must be deactivated and then a new row selected/activated. It is this example where low tRCD's can improve performance. However, like any other memory timing, putting this too low for the module can result in instability.
tRP is the time required to terminate one one Row access and begin the next row access. Another way to look at this it that tRP is the delay required between deactivating the current row and selecting the next row. Therefore, in conjunction with tRCD, the time required (or clock cycles required) to switch banks (or rows) and select the next cell for either reading, writing or refreshing is a combination of tRP and tRCD.
Memory architecture is like a spreadsheet with row upon row and column upon column with each row being 1 bank. In order for the CPU to access memory, it must first determine which Row or Bank in the memory that is to be accessed and activate that row via the RAS signal. Once activated, the row can be accessed over and over until the data is exhausted. This is why tRAS has little effect on overall system performance but could impact system stability if set incorrectly.
The Command Rate is the time needed between the chip select signal and the when commands can be issued to the RAM module IC. Typically, these are either 1 clock or 2.
Memory testing is a process of trial and error, find and seek the maximum. This is pretty much a sucker for your free time.
If you are going to overclock then increase the FSB, change the memory timings, but most of all alter memory dividers until your system won't boot. If you are not comfortable with such a thing, hey this isn't your game then. I recommend you to lower the processor's multiplier and then slightly increase the FSB with high memory timings and take it from there timings wise.
In the BIOS you can often find and change the memory timings.
We review the Corsair Vengeance K95 mechanical keyboard with cherry red switches. The K95 is the flagship successor in the popular Vengeance keyboard series and while it uses the same basis and conc...
Corsair Carbide 330R review
We review and test the Corsair Carbide 330R, also known as hero. The new model is aimed at a more audiophile tense segment as it has sound dampening materials all over the place.
Corsair Force LS 240GB SSD Review
Corsair has released the Force LS series SSD, and we review it. This is the arrival of the new 19nm Toggle NAND based LS series for consumers is aimed to be a more affordable product series within Corsair's extensive SSD range. And though not the fastest kid on the block it definitely knows how to impress. Let's check out the review.
Corsair Obsidian 750D review
We test and review the all new Corsair Obsidian 750D chassis. The chassis is of course based of its bigger brother the 900D which was recently released and embraced by the PC enthusiast community.