Return to the frontpage Read all the latest news-items on one page Download drivers, demo's, patches, tools in our huge file-section Our game reviews Our articles and guides Our latest hardware reviews and tests Return to homepage Be one of the 150.000 users discussing in our forums Search specific things in our news and articles
 
 You are here: Home » Hardware reviews » Videocards


 GeForce FX 5800 Ultra - The review

 By: Hilbert Hagedoorn Edited by  | Published: March 5, 2003  


Today we bring you a review on the heavily discussed GeForce FX 5800 Ultra. Ever since the first review came out on the web three weeks ago there has been much talk and gossip going on. It didn't fulfill expectations the consumer had, doesn't beat Radeon 9700 Pro, uses fastest memory in the world yet is 128-bit and most of all we've seen a lot of humorous images around the web where people use the FX as hair-dryer, leaf-blower. In the mean time, 3D Mark 03 was released, NVIDIA was not rather fond of this synthetic benchmark and refuses to see it as a 'gamers' benchmark for many good reasons.

While we will not get into that discussion we will state this, much to my surprise nVIDIA chose to optimize Detonator drivers for 3D Mark 03 to get the score up and actually delivers these 42.68 drivers along with the press-package I received. That by itself validates the fact that nVIDIA recognized 3D Mark 03 as common used and accepted benchmark. If nVIDIA would not decided to optimize the drivers and would not have delivered them to the press then this site would not have used the benchmark. However now we will. So there are two things in my mind regarding 3DMark 03:

  • Right now there is no other way to benchmark DX9 performance .. and you need a DX9 benchmark to review DX9 hardware. 
  • All synthetic benchmarks are liable to be manipulated with drivers optimised for the benchmark ... this has happened since the early days of graphics benchmarking and will continue to occur. It is a moral responsibility for the graphics companies not to do this ... although there is also pressure since if they get caught cheating it will be bad for them (e.g. Quake vs Quack although not synthetic was a nice example).

I sincerely do not see 3D Mark 03 in a definitive benchmark in the way that 3D Mark 2001 was. But we will use is it as part of our benchmark suite, we need a DX9 test,  but this benchmark will be a much lower rating in terms of deriving your overall score.


GeForce FX 5800 Ultra Graphics Core

3DMark 03 is not a game it's a synthetic benchmark and should been seen as such, therefore out of this 24 page review and dozens of performance tests only one small page is dedicated to it. I've tried quite hard to get Massive's new DirectX9 benchmark Aquamark 3 into our review suite yet my requests have not been succesful:

Dear Hilbert

The Aquamark 3 will be published in Q1 2003.We will inform you as soon as the Aquamark 3 is available for press and public. Please understand that we can't give away any pre-versions of the Aquamark 3 before its official publishment.

Yours sincerely,

Verena Schmidt

Well, I can't blame them. At least I tried people. We'll review the GeForce FX the way it's meant to be, with a lot of games. We'll do additional quality tests with AntiAliasing and Anisotropic filtering enabled in varied methods. We'll test it on an AMD Athlon and Intel Pentium 4 platform. We've also have chosen not to review the GeForce FX on a 3 GHz machine because let us be honest ... who has such a system right now and most of all, do you need such a CPU while your graphics card should do that work ? No we will use common PC's in the 1.5 to 2.4 GHz performance range like the bigger part of you use right now. Also, and I must state this right away to make you aware of it, compared to other reviews we have the luxury of using more matured and better drivers. There definitely is a gain compared to other reviews on the web released a while ago. All the facts compiled with the tests will lead this review in to a conclusion and whether you like that conclusion or not .. this is what we believe GeForce FX 5800 Ultra is all about.

You better get something to drink because this is going to be a long review. We'll start of with a piece of the technology briefing as you could have read in our preview, then we undress the 5800 Ultra and show you images of her in the nude, then we'll show you some things about the drivers, then we'll test and thus benchmark it and by the time we tried to overclock the card we'll slowly move to the conclusion.

Have fun :)



 


 

Pages (24): [1] 2 3 next » ... Last »


 

previous page

homepage

 

Check lowest prices on these products in Guru3D.com price guide, among the available categories: Retail & OEM Processors - Video Cards - Motherboards - Memory - Soundcards - Hard Drives - Monitors - Printers - DVDs - CD-RWs - PDAs and more !

Copyright (c) 1997-2011 Hilbert Hagedoorn, All Rights Reserved. - Legal disclaimer/notice
The Guru of 3D, Guru3D, the Hardware guru, HardwareGuru and 3D Guru are the trademark ownership of Hilbert Hagedoorn.



  Site Navigation
   Home
   Latest News
   Submit News
   Hardware Reviews
   Articles & Guides
   VGA Charts 
   Game Reviews
   Forums
   Download Section
   Guru3D Price Grabber
   Guru Price Grabber UK
   Guru PC Buyers Guide
   Guru3D Stereo Section
   Guru3D Clan
   Guru3D Folding@Home
   Contact us
   Join our news-letter
   Follow us on Twitter new
   Set as Homepage
 

  Affiliates

RivaTuner
nVHardPage
3DMark Vantage
SiSoft SANDRA
AfterBurner OC tool
nVTempLogger
ATI Tray Tools

Guru3D Rig of the Month
  Links
Your company ?
Registry Booster 2011
Your company ?
  Downloads
NVIDIA GeForce drivers
ATI Catalyst drivers
Benchmarks & Demo's
Game Demo's
NVIDIA Chipset drivers
Intel Chipset drivers